Sunshine, Light, and Joy

 

This is a post that I've been thinking about for awhile. Recently, I opened up the discussion to other members of the staff to get their feelings on the matter, and their opinions generally matched mine, which is this:

Within the last year or so, there's been a steady increase of negative posts in movie threads. We've always had some heated discussions for some movies, but recently things have not only gotten more histrionic in those threads (generally speaking, the CBM ones), but they've started to spread to other franchises and other movies as well. I'm not talking about out-and-out trolling, I'm talking about members feeling they have to consistently shit on a movie (or studio, or star) simply because they aren't interested in the current project or projects. With every piece of news about a movie, it's now a virtual guarantee that there's a flood of people rushing to say they think it sucks, they don't like the current trailer/tv spot/actor/actress/director/concept. And I get it -- we all have movies we don't like, movies which we think are bad ideas, industry people that just don't appeal to us. But there's a fine line between expressing your opinion about this and doing it so often, with such consistency, that the collective emphasis of all of it basically brings down the entire thread and thus the entire forum.

There's no easy answer to this. We don't want to crush freedom of expression here. But at the same time, the spirit of this forum is for people to have fun talking about the movies they love and the box-office runs they love.

To have fun.

And while it may be fun -- in a sense -- to personally vent about a movie, or to vent at people who dare to enjoy something you don't, it doesn't bring fun to our community. In fact, it generally drags down the overall fun for everyone else. We've had people repeatedly mention to us over the last several months or so that in some cases they don't even bother going into some threads -- even for movies they're curious about! -- because they just don't want to deal with the overall mess those threads contain. And frankly, that matches the personal opinion of most of the staff as well.

So this post is both a request and a warning. 

The request: Next time you feel like taking a dump on a movie (or a topic) for the dozenth time, take a moment to consider whether it's really worth it. People probably already have a good idea of what your attitude about the project is. Maybe just put your posting energy into a movie that you enjoy and love or are excited about.

The warning: The staff is going to be taking a closer look at some of these threads and we'll be more active with temp thread-bans if we think it'll help the overall vibe of the forum. I'd rather we don't have to, but it's not going to constrain any of you too much if you aren't allowed to post about a movie you supposedly don't care about anyway.

Remember the words of Bill and Ted: "Be Excellent to Each Other".

They're just movies, guys. It's about having fun.

Welcome to The Box Office Theory — Forums

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Orestes

Free Account
  • Content count

    6,041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6,556 Likes

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Screw You, Spaceship

Recent Profile Visitors

2,304 profile views
  1. Cinemascore seems far worse than RT. Isn't it 5 theaters, 3 of which are in LA? That's a super small sample and one that's too heavily biased by a single city's tastes. And if Baywatch tested over 91 multiple times, I'd say the flaw is with how they conducted their testing, not with RT.
  2. I think Scott's Alien movies are dead. Don't know about Pirates, except that if they do another they'll probably have to cut the budget some.
  3. Not only was it stupid, but they weren't fooling anybody. It just made the marketing and the whole "mystery box" nonsense extra obnoxious. Even worse that IM3 had successfully pulled off a similar twist, and kept it a surprise, a couple weeks earlier.
  4. The ironic thing is the guys goin full piss-baby over the women only screenings are the kind of guys that makes women only screenings appealing in the first place.
  5. Yeah, but Avengers was the point at which Marvel built their brand up enough that Ant-Man could make 500m+.
  6. I'm not sure how much being "iconic" actually means. In the early days of the MCU, the Hulk was arguably the most iconic character that Marvel studios had the rights to, and yet his movie is by far their lowest grossing.