TheDarkKnightOfSteel

Cavill will be fine for the next couple of years at least. The general audience likes him. He has made some terrible choices though. But nowadays there is not one actor, Cruise aside, that can sell a movie on name alone. Audiences are smart, even though studio seem to always forget that. With Argylle his only fault was that he agreed to be in a terrible movie for 10 minutes that media sold as HIS movie. WOM was toxic and he could have easily avoided that. I mean Warfare is only his second post-Witcher movie and is getting good wom out of the gate. Not his fault that Lionsgate just decided to dump it. IMO in the right role the audiences will be more than willing to watch his movies. Hopefully Highlander, which on paper sounds promising, will be it. And then there is a rumor that soon we will see him in a Marvel movie ?

The fall guy being a let down does not sit well with me because it’s an original. That being said, it seems like films that on paper should perform strong … do not. Even popular IP films are disappointing.The idea of a movie star being a bo draw is long dead to me. And then look at Civil War. Maybe now HW will learn to embrace more original ideas and fresh faces in front and behind the cameras. The audiences for one seem to be interested.

Stop casting Pascal in everything. Fantastic actor, yes, but not for Reed. I love Kirby though. Still sad that Driver/Robbie/ Mescal were what we almost got but we did not.

Trailer did nothing for me. Mostly because I found the action generic, the jokes didn’t land and, most importantly, I am a huge Logan fanboy and I thought it was the perfect ending for Jackman’s Wolverine so bringing him back here seems odd.

Matthew Vaughn’s rep is gonna become the real agent Argylle

No wonder Cavill dropped his management after this. Seriously, he signed in for a cameo in a movie that put him front and centre in the marketing and one that he could easily avoid. Now he gets another panned film to his credit that it will flop too. All things considered Howard is the lucky one here lol.

https://x.com/colliderfrosty/status/1752347175365804199?s=20

Damn I love Ritchie movies and the trailer still exceeds my expectations. Cavill seems to have a lot of fun here. Cast is good. Can’t wait. That being said, editing any trailer to a Queen song is just cheating.

Alcock was fantastic in HOTD. Girl has charisma to spare. Love the casting.

So some reactions from critics have surfaced online and they seemed pretty positive. They do say that the twists are many and good and to fo as blind as possible but still don’t know if they are worth dooming the theatrical run of the film.

Don’t count on Ministry to have a big push. It comes out early April and we don’t even have a trailer. Again a shame because the cast is talented. Stahelski sounds really excited about Highlander so he is definitely directing.

I think Henry is good for action movie but that’s about it so, even if he was the age of Chalamett and Mescal, he wouldn’t go for the same roles. He even said it himself that he is fine doing only these action films. He was decent with drama (Tudors) but not enough to go for Oscar bait roles. He has Stahelsky’s Highlander though and the two Guy Ritchie films so it’s not like he is desperate for work. Personally, I am very excited for all these 3 films. I love both directors.

Me over here thinking that nothing in Barbie warranted a box office nomination other than production design and maybe script. So I a love Margott so much but my biggest surprise is that this movie faired so good in awards season. Seriously, if you would tell me a year ago that it would get all this recognition I would laugh at you.

This literally has one of the worst marketing campaigns ever and it will be a real shame if it turns out to be good and with the cast.

What’s Amsterdam ? update: lol