Sunshine, Light, and Joy

 

This is a post that I've been thinking about for awhile. Recently, I opened up the discussion to other members of the staff to get their feelings on the matter, and their opinions generally matched mine, which is this:

Within the last year or so, there's been a steady increase of negative posts in movie threads. We've always had some heated discussions for some movies, but recently things have not only gotten more histrionic in those threads (generally speaking, the CBM ones), but they've started to spread to other franchises and other movies as well. I'm not talking about out-and-out trolling, I'm talking about members feeling they have to consistently shit on a movie (or studio, or star) simply because they aren't interested in the current project or projects. With every piece of news about a movie, it's now a virtual guarantee that there's a flood of people rushing to say they think it sucks, they don't like the current trailer/tv spot/actor/actress/director/concept. And I get it -- we all have movies we don't like, movies which we think are bad ideas, industry people that just don't appeal to us. But there's a fine line between expressing your opinion about this and doing it so often, with such consistency, that the collective emphasis of all of it basically brings down the entire thread and thus the entire forum.

There's no easy answer to this. We don't want to crush freedom of expression here. But at the same time, the spirit of this forum is for people to have fun talking about the movies they love and the box-office runs they love.

To have fun.

And while it may be fun -- in a sense -- to personally vent about a movie, or to vent at people who dare to enjoy something you don't, it doesn't bring fun to our community. In fact, it generally drags down the overall fun for everyone else. We've had people repeatedly mention to us over the last several months or so that in some cases they don't even bother going into some threads -- even for movies they're curious about! -- because they just don't want to deal with the overall mess those threads contain. And frankly, that matches the personal opinion of most of the staff as well.

So this post is both a request and a warning. 

The request: Next time you feel like taking a dump on a movie (or a topic) for the dozenth time, take a moment to consider whether it's really worth it. People probably already have a good idea of what your attitude about the project is. Maybe just put your posting energy into a movie that you enjoy and love or are excited about.

The warning: The staff is going to be taking a closer look at some of these threads and we'll be more active with temp thread-bans if we think it'll help the overall vibe of the forum. I'd rather we don't have to, but it's not going to constrain any of you too much if you aren't allowed to post about a movie you supposedly don't care about anyway.

Remember the words of Bill and Ted: "Be Excellent to Each Other".

They're just movies, guys. It's about having fun.

Welcome to The Box Office Theory — Forums

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Amadeus

Free Account
  • Content count

    630
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

321 Likes

About Amadeus

  • Rank
    Sleeper Hit
  • Birthday 09/05/1990

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Sweden

Recent Profile Visitors

941 profile views
  1. I don't Think Ridley's even is intrested in the Alien-franchise. The Prometheus saga is what he's intrested in, and you really could feel how much he didn't even bother about the Alien parts in Covenant. But if the Movie was just covenant he wouldn't get the $$$ he needed to make this truly facinating and 70% totally awesome movie. It's like he gave the studio the long finger for wanting him to add Alien to the Covenant. This Movie would have been a solid A.
  2. This club is like the opening sequnce of Lawrence of Arabia.
  3. The James Bonds of the 70's ("Live n let Die", The Spy Who Loved me" etc.)
  4. Maybe too many of those "Not an event" lately.
  5. This May may actually have shot at becoming the worst Box office May since 2006 ($780m). Interesting since that May (2006) also happened to begin with a monday and that has happened again until now. April (2006) became the best April ever (a record held until 2009). This April also broke the record. Both Aprils began with a wednesday.
  6. Since tele's all lawrence I have this feeling he did walk a bridge too far back in 1977
  7. Since they used 15-16 of their greatest hits (from "ABBA Gold") I think they have to look at Björn and Benny's other work. There were like three hits from CHESS musical. They had an enormous hit here in sweden with "DU ÄR IN MAN" And then there is this song called "THE DAY BEFORE YOU CAME" which might be the greatest pop song ever; musically it's minimalism at its finest; lyrically it's full of gaps and strong (and at the same time vague) pictory, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HnOFwqpLRQ
  8. Dont leave us hanging tele... Don't let me down
  9. haha... welcome to BOT, the place where TDKR is #1 2012
  10. Agree... And Top Gun for the 80's, and Titanic for the 90's. I wonder what will be the iconics of the 00's and 10's will be..
  11. Are we going to do 1977 as well? The winner could be very easy to guess though. Can you mention a more iconic 1977 film than this?
  12. Ridley Scott: I have a great idea! Fox: Yeah! Good for you! How much will it cost? Ridley Scott: $50m... Maybe... Fox: OK. Let's say we give you $100m. But then you gotta have these scenes in the film: [2 scenes from ALIEN, 2 scenes from ALIENS] Ridley Scott: Well... 100m doesn't sound too bad... Then I can make the cinematography look really good... Fox: Hey! Stop... Cinematography... What's that?... Just do your work...
  13. Sorry! Didn't mean to upset you. It's just that Scot probably wanted to make a 70's slasher wherein people act irrational because of genre conventions. As a slasher it's flawless and as film and it also happens to have some great ideas (cinematic and storywise). What I mean is that RLM and others imply that the most important thing in movie criticism is what the viewer thinks of the work rather than what the director wants the work to be. Often you hear comments like "it wasn't what I thought/wanted it to be", and those kinds of comments are childish.