I am amused by the fact that both sides of this argument are claiming that they are 100 % right. Although it could be said that there is no certainty that the dog was unequivocally, 100 % abused/mistreated, the same thing can be said about not being any certainty that the dog was unequivocally, 100 %NOT mistreated. Although all I need to know is right there on the video, everyone is acting on impulse. So those who are acting all high and mighty with their "facts hurt!" and "you don't know shit!"...please, you are on the same boat.