Sunshine, Light, and Joy

 

This is a post that I've been thinking about for awhile. Recently, I opened up the discussion to other members of the staff to get their feelings on the matter, and their opinions generally matched mine, which is this:

Within the last year or so, there's been a steady increase of negative posts in movie threads. We've always had some heated discussions for some movies, but recently things have not only gotten more histrionic in those threads (generally speaking, the CBM ones), but they've started to spread to other franchises and other movies as well. I'm not talking about out-and-out trolling, I'm talking about members feeling they have to consistently shit on a movie (or studio, or star) simply because they aren't interested in the current project or projects. With every piece of news about a movie, it's now a virtual guarantee that there's a flood of people rushing to say they think it sucks, they don't like the current trailer/tv spot/actor/actress/director/concept. And I get it -- we all have movies we don't like, movies which we think are bad ideas, industry people that just don't appeal to us. But there's a fine line between expressing your opinion about this and doing it so often, with such consistency, that the collective emphasis of all of it basically brings down the entire thread and thus the entire forum.

There's no easy answer to this. We don't want to crush freedom of expression here. But at the same time, the spirit of this forum is for people to have fun talking about the movies they love and the box-office runs they love.

To have fun.

And while it may be fun -- in a sense -- to personally vent about a movie, or to vent at people who dare to enjoy something you don't, it doesn't bring fun to our community. In fact, it generally drags down the overall fun for everyone else. We've had people repeatedly mention to us over the last several months or so that in some cases they don't even bother going into some threads -- even for movies they're curious about! -- because they just don't want to deal with the overall mess those threads contain. And frankly, that matches the personal opinion of most of the staff as well.

So this post is both a request and a warning. 

The request: Next time you feel like taking a dump on a movie (or a topic) for the dozenth time, take a moment to consider whether it's really worth it. People probably already have a good idea of what your attitude about the project is. Maybe just put your posting energy into a movie that you enjoy and love or are excited about.

The warning: The staff is going to be taking a closer look at some of these threads and we'll be more active with temp thread-bans if we think it'll help the overall vibe of the forum. I'd rather we don't have to, but it's not going to constrain any of you too much if you aren't allowed to post about a movie you supposedly don't care about anyway.

Remember the words of Bill and Ted: "Be Excellent to Each Other".

They're just movies, guys. It's about having fun.

Welcome to The Box Office Theory — Forums

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

kowhite

Free Account
  • Content count

    14,123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

14,190 Likes

About kowhite

  • Rank
    Global Phenomenon
  • Birthday

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    California
  • Interests
    Box office and cookies

Recent Profile Visitors

2,646 profile views
  1. Yeah, Whedon is gonna have a good salary. I suppose it just depends on the scope of the film. If he wants to be lavish in his production design that alone could drive the cost up. And Whedon is clearly taking a bigger role in the DCEU I don't imagine they'll nickel and dime him. Look how much WB gave Yates for a Tarzan movie.
  2. Yeah, Whedon is gonna have a good salary. I suppose it just depends on the scope of the film. If he wants to be lavish in his production design that alone could drive the cost up. And Whedon is clearly taking a bigger role in the DCEU I don't imagine they'll nickel and dime him. Look how much WB gave Yates for a Tarzan movie.
  3. Its Joss. Unless he only wants 80m, he'll get more. Hell they'll probably give him more regardless. So yeah, put me in the doubt pool. Besides, everything costs more than the Internet says. Except Deadpool.
  4. Yeah sorry Deadpool doesn't look 200m. If you told me it was 80 sure. Maybe 100m. Granted it did what it did very well, but its scope is much smaller than other comic movies. And that was to its benefit. Unless there's a scene where they burn a pile of 100m of real money I'm forgetting.
  5. I must apologize Tele I called this club crazy. Even though it's probably still unlikely, it's going to be damn closer than I ever imagined and is possible,
  6. Cause Laura Dern might have words about that.
  7. Im still waiting to see the third act of Jurassic Park III.
  8. I figured this would drop like Pirates 5 from 4, for some reason I thought this would do better than this. Bay should've called it at 4, this is bad. Guess people really hated Extinction.
  9. Do it grim, we have faith in your negotiation skills.
  10. I imagine they'd like to make a movie sooner than later too. By 2019 that's 5 years.
  11. Good to hear. This is one of a few franchises where I just can't pay attention to critics, unless they're named baumer. So, I'll probably like this. Don't judge me forum.
  12. That was a multiple choice question...