Sunshine, Light, and Joy

 

This is a post that I've been thinking about for awhile. Recently, I opened up the discussion to other members of the staff to get their feelings on the matter, and their opinions generally matched mine, which is this:

Within the last year or so, there's been a steady increase of negative posts in movie threads. We've always had some heated discussions for some movies, but recently things have not only gotten more histrionic in those threads (generally speaking, the CBM ones), but they've started to spread to other franchises and other movies as well. I'm not talking about out-and-out trolling, I'm talking about members feeling they have to consistently shit on a movie (or studio, or star) simply because they aren't interested in the current project or projects. With every piece of news about a movie, it's now a virtual guarantee that there's a flood of people rushing to say they think it sucks, they don't like the current trailer/tv spot/actor/actress/director/concept. And I get it -- we all have movies we don't like, movies which we think are bad ideas, industry people that just don't appeal to us. But there's a fine line between expressing your opinion about this and doing it so often, with such consistency, that the collective emphasis of all of it basically brings down the entire thread and thus the entire forum.

There's no easy answer to this. We don't want to crush freedom of expression here. But at the same time, the spirit of this forum is for people to have fun talking about the movies they love and the box-office runs they love.

To have fun.

And while it may be fun -- in a sense -- to personally vent about a movie, or to vent at people who dare to enjoy something you don't, it doesn't bring fun to our community. In fact, it generally drags down the overall fun for everyone else. We've had people repeatedly mention to us over the last several months or so that in some cases they don't even bother going into some threads -- even for movies they're curious about! -- because they just don't want to deal with the overall mess those threads contain. And frankly, that matches the personal opinion of most of the staff as well.

So this post is both a request and a warning. 

The request: Next time you feel like taking a dump on a movie (or a topic) for the dozenth time, take a moment to consider whether it's really worth it. People probably already have a good idea of what your attitude about the project is. Maybe just put your posting energy into a movie that you enjoy and love or are excited about.

The warning: The staff is going to be taking a closer look at some of these threads and we'll be more active with temp thread-bans if we think it'll help the overall vibe of the forum. I'd rather we don't have to, but it's not going to constrain any of you too much if you aren't allowed to post about a movie you supposedly don't care about anyway.

Remember the words of Bill and Ted: "Be Excellent to Each Other".

They're just movies, guys. It's about having fun.

Welcome to The Box Office Theory — Forums

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

DMan7

Free Account
  • Content count

    7,350
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4,124 Likes

About DMan7

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,325 profile views
  1. Anyone else thinking they are making more than just a trilogy with this? I'm thinking Universal is planning to go beyond 3 movies, something similar to their Fast movies.
  2. The WW sequel is probably 2 years away at the very least so she can has within that time to make as much as she wants.
  3. All we need now is for them to confirm the kid in Iron Man 3 is Nova.
  4. That 1 negative review is probably from Armond White. lol
  5. Evan Peters is the perfect Han Solo replacement, in fact he should've been cast in the first place.
  6. I actually wanted these guys to direct flash, but after all their recent issues with the Han Solo movie I would rather they not bring all that baggage with them into this project. DC should just wait for Zemekis already.
  7. So we got a Doctor, a scientist, a captain, a God, a thief... I feel as if there's a joke in there somewhere.
  8. Marvel will have 7 films next year and they had 4 films in 2016. We aren't just talking about MCU films here but Marvel films in general from FOX and SONY. I'm sure that's what WB is looking at in terms of planning to release 3 to 4 movies per year to compete with their major competitor releases in the market.
  9. Nah its just an example of how WB/DC can label their movies by grouping them by year instead of doing it similar to Marvel's phases. Besides I'm also missing out a few more as well other than Aquaman, there's still Black Adam and Flash
  10. At the end of the day its difficult to quantify what level of box office draw a certain actor / actress has on a movie and it would be impossible to remake the same movie at the same time the original movie was release with a different actor / actress to see if it has a bigger or smaller draw.
  11. I don't think any actor / actresses are box office draws, its just the interesting concept of the movie and hype / marketing that draws people to watch it.