Sunshine, Light, and Joy

 

This is a post that I've been thinking about for awhile. Recently, I opened up the discussion to other members of the staff to get their feelings on the matter, and their opinions generally matched mine, which is this:

Within the last year or so, there's been a steady increase of negative posts in movie threads. We've always had some heated discussions for some movies, but recently things have not only gotten more histrionic in those threads (generally speaking, the CBM ones), but they've started to spread to other franchises and other movies as well. I'm not talking about out-and-out trolling, I'm talking about members feeling they have to consistently shit on a movie (or studio, or star) simply because they aren't interested in the current project or projects. With every piece of news about a movie, it's now a virtual guarantee that there's a flood of people rushing to say they think it sucks, they don't like the current trailer/tv spot/actor/actress/director/concept. And I get it -- we all have movies we don't like, movies which we think are bad ideas, industry people that just don't appeal to us. But there's a fine line between expressing your opinion about this and doing it so often, with such consistency, that the collective emphasis of all of it basically brings down the entire thread and thus the entire forum.

There's no easy answer to this. We don't want to crush freedom of expression here. But at the same time, the spirit of this forum is for people to have fun talking about the movies they love and the box-office runs they love.

To have fun.

And while it may be fun -- in a sense -- to personally vent about a movie, or to vent at people who dare to enjoy something you don't, it doesn't bring fun to our community. In fact, it generally drags down the overall fun for everyone else. We've had people repeatedly mention to us over the last several months or so that in some cases they don't even bother going into some threads -- even for movies they're curious about! -- because they just don't want to deal with the overall mess those threads contain. And frankly, that matches the personal opinion of most of the staff as well.

So this post is both a request and a warning. 

The request: Next time you feel like taking a dump on a movie (or a topic) for the dozenth time, take a moment to consider whether it's really worth it. People probably already have a good idea of what your attitude about the project is. Maybe just put your posting energy into a movie that you enjoy and love or are excited about.

The warning: The staff is going to be taking a closer look at some of these threads and we'll be more active with temp thread-bans if we think it'll help the overall vibe of the forum. I'd rather we don't have to, but it's not going to constrain any of you too much if you aren't allowed to post about a movie you supposedly don't care about anyway.

Remember the words of Bill and Ted: "Be Excellent to Each Other".

They're just movies, guys. It's about having fun.

Welcome to The Box Office Theory — Forums

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Neo

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 | 5.5.2017 | William Hurt Returns as General Thaddeus "Thunderbolt" Ross | New Trailer on Page 69

4,811 posts in this topic

Need more John C. Reilly. Get that man more screen time.

 

And give him a code name

 

His code name is John SpaCe Reilly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His code name is John SpaCe Reilly

 

I was thinking the Magic Man.

 

 

And bring in dat Christine Everhart

Edited by MrPink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"I know a lot of where I want to go. I have a lot of ideas for stories and characters that are going to appear, and there are documents written up, that some people have, about Peter Quill’s father and his relationship, a lot of stuff about Yondu and a lot of stuff about Drax that nobody knows." "Kevin Feige has stuff. I wrote up a lot. He knows all the stuff and if I died tomorrow they could go make a movie. They could write the story of Peter Quill’s father and it would all be there. I think Yondu is a very important character, a really important character in this universe, and I think Nebula is really important too and so I think we’ll see more of both of those characters." http://www.filmdivider.com/4171/james-gunn-on-guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-promising-nebula-yondu-and-peter-quills-father/

:wub: :wub: :wub:
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From page 2, what do you think?

 

If the stone in Loki's staff is an Infinity Stone, is this the actual Gem? The other stones have been a cube, liquid and an

orb  - now we know its an actual gem (looks like), not the orb itself,

maybe the stones need to go through a process like the Mind Gem has already to be ready to fit in the Gauntlet.

In Guardians the stone is purple, not red like we know, has it not fully changed?

If it is the Mind Gem and the stone in the staff was blue, it would make sense seeing as Loki was trying to subjugate the people of Germany and the mind gem is blue.

 

Feige has said not necessarily to base them on color. Maybe he means initially but after transformed (mind gem) they do correspond to their color.

Edited by Neo
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the Guantlet prop has one gem that's a lot bigger than the others, that looks just like the one in Loki's Staff:

Posted Image

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mantis/bug

 

Unfortunately, Marvel doesn't have the film rights to Bug as he's tied up with Micronauts.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guardians is much better than Serenity. Firefly... yeah, it's better than that too

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guardians is much better than Serenity. Firefly... yeah, it's better than that too

 

Pretty sure Guardians borrowed alot from both of them

Edited by eXtacy
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty sure Guardians borrowed alot from both of them

Oh, it definitely did. Not sure on it being better than Firefly, but it's much better than Serenity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

firefly is bad television. it's not a good thing.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Need more John C. Reilly. Get that man more screen time.

 

And give him a code name

YES, YES, YES.

 

YEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

firefly is bad television. it's not a good thing.

 

Posted Image

12 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having seen the movie a second time...I cannot wait for the sequel.  :D

Edited by Alpha
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Need more John C. Reilly. Get that man more screen time.And give him a code name

Well, technically he's Nova, so he already has one.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

firefly is bad television. it's not a good thing.

LOL, I knew you'd say that :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Initial prediction

 

125m OW | 350m DOM | 520m OS | 870m WW

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some Guardians 2 tidbits

 

Importantly, Gunn had a major revelation for fans trying to work out who Peter Quill's father might be. "It’s definitely not the character who it is in the comics, I’ll say that much."

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This will explode domestically if it gets a sequel. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This will explode domestically if it gets a sequel. 

Already got a sequel. July 2017. They announced it a week before release at SDCC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.