GOING IN STYLE | 04.07.17 | Warner Brothers | current gross ● 38.70 M

[That One Girl]

1 minute ago, Grand Moff Tele said:

 

50m OW

 

BANK ON IT

 

When I saw the trailer, I was surprised you weren't in it given your age  

[Plain Old Tele]

I didn't even watch the trailer when I wrote that previous post.

 

 

ZOMG it's like HELL OR HIGH WATER: THE HAPPY GERIATRIC VERSION

 

 

[Blankments]

Got a trailer at A Monster Calls; looks ridiculously dull

[franfar]

 

[Jayhawk the Hutt]

Just now, franfar said:

 

#OldPeopleTwitter

[franfar]

3 minutes ago, Jayhawk said:

#OldPeopleTwitter

I wonder if he was forced to say that...

[Jandrew]

On 1/24/2017 at 1:41 AM, Blankments said:

Got a trailer at A Monster Calls; looks ridiculously dull

 

Dull is how I'd kind of describe it to. I was thinking it was gonna be more in the style of Last Vegas. At least it's not raunchy though.

[grim22]

50 advanced screenings across the US next Wednesday: https://gofobo.com/index.php/main/blp/YW1jc3R1YnNnb2luZ2luc3R5bGU=

 

@Dexter of Suburbia San Diego is on the list

[DAR]

Kind of surprised DeNiro isn't anywhere near this

[Plain Old Tele]

This is gonna be epic.

[Cmasterclay]

4 minutes ago, TelemAAchos said:

This is gonna be epic.

I can't tell if you're really excited for this or just playing up the old thing tbh.

[filmlover]

1 hour ago, TelemAAchos said:

This is gonna be epic.

[dxmatrixdt]

Going in Style
 

Domestic Total Adj. Gross: $92,597,300 Distributor: Warner Bros. Release Date: December 25, 1979

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_in_Style_(2017_film)

"While Going in Style hasn't been wide released yet, it has gained critical acclaim from the few critics who've seen it. "

 

^^no source for this remark on wikipedia. 

 

 

[SLAM!]

4 hours ago, Matrix4You said:

Going in Style
 

Domestic Total Adj. Gross: $92,597,300 Distributor: Warner Bros. Release Date: December 25, 1979

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_in_Style_(2017_film)

"While Going in Style hasn't been wide released yet, it has gained critical acclaim from the few critics who've seen it. "

 

^^no source for this remark on wikipedia. 

 

 

 

[Jake Gittes]

I looked this up on Letterboxd a few days ago and it was nothing but 3-star reviews that all boiled down to, "This sure is a movie that exists".

[aabattery]

Michael Caine is going hard on the Twitter promotion for this. Complete with watermarked photos, bless his heart.

 

 

[nick64]

10 reviews in so far: 30% on Rotten Tomatoes, 50 on Metacritic

[Jake Gittes]

Saw this. Yep. The most whatever movie I've come across in a while. Nothing worth going to the theater for. 

[DAJK]

2 minutes ago, Jake Gittes said:

Saw this. Yep. The most whatever movie I've come across in a while. Nothing worth going to the theater for. 

Is it explicitly bad? I go for free so is there a chance I may enjoy it?

[Jake Gittes]

Just now, DAJK said:

Is it explicitly bad? I go for free so is there a chance I may enjoy it?

 

It's too unambitious for that. Your usual lazy broad forgettable studio comedy, only occasionally funny and too distracted by random gags and subplots and stock comic relief supporting characters to really use the actors' (and characters') advanced age for anything meaningful. But it's under 100 minutes and Caine, Freeman and Arkin are pros so you might enjoy it at least somewhat.