CoolioD1 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 by the w pretty sure michael shannon's not in this anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aabattery Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 1 minute ago, CoolioD1 said: by the w pretty sure michael shannon's not in this anymore. Well that sucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 8 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said: by the w pretty sure michael shannon's not in this anymore. Nope. On the bright side, we have Jerry! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Durden Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 http://ew.com/movies/2017/04/21/logan-lucky-first-look-steven-soderbergh/? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 Rated PG-13 for language and some crude comments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalismanRing Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 Interesting distribution stuff from the EW piece Quote So this is your critique of studio distribution and an attempt to simplify it. My feeling is that it’s gotten way too expensive to release a film wide, and the way that the economic structure of a studio is set up, if you’ve what we’ve done on this movie — which is everybody’s worked for scale — you’re too far away from your money. That’s why there is no middle man. There is no one talking a cut. The money is coming directly back to the creative pool. This sounds like a much larger version of what Shane Carruth did on Upstream Color, which he released entirely by himself.If it works, it’s a lane for people like myself to drive in. We formed Fingerprint Releasing to do this and to be able to export this to other filmmakers. So if someone like Alejandro Iñárritu, Alexander Payne, or Sofia Coppola wants to use this model that we’ve set up, it’s sitting there ready to be used. Is there any kind of short explanation for what the plan is?There’s no one component that hasn’t been done before, but I think it’s a combination of components. There have been advancements in technology that make it a lot easier to get a movie out in 3,000 screens than it was even two years ago. The economic model is pretty simple. You sell the foreign to cover the cost of the [film] negative. We sell the non-theatrical rights to cover the cost of the [prints and advertising], and that’s it. It’s really simple. People have done this before. The distribution part is only a little different because we control it in a way that you normally don’t get to control distribution. Question, how long will distributors being paying for "prints" in a digital model? I heard there was still costs attached to pay back for the digital upgrade in theaters - when does that end? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaudeManhattan Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 Where's the trailer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4815162342 Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 @Chewy we are in accent heaven here 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 Daniel Craig's accent in this is amazeballs. Looks fun. I've missed Soderbergh. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolioD1 Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 This looks so fucking stupid. I'm there opening day. 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewy Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 Welcome back, Soderbergh. You were missed 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 Looks so fucking great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cmasterclay Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 rofl this shit probably just jumped to #1 on my most anticipated movies of the summer tbf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morieris Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 The cinematography already is impressing me, but that's it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 This is gonna break out big, this is obviously what GA are thirsty for right now. Soderbergh can't help but win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewy Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 I know May's been shit but this summer actually looks pretty good to me, even the superhero movies look fun. And then you got smaller stuff that won't perform at the BO but should be worth a watch like this and Dunkirk 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 1 minute ago, Chewy said: stuff that won't perform at the BO but should be worth a watch like this and Dunkirk @MrPink also Valerian probably Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 Can't wait for the inevitable : "Valerian Saved Summer Critics Quotes in Promo Clips from STX next July." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...