Jump to content

jstevan

Free Account+
  • Posts

    149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jstevan

  1. 3 hours ago, DAJK said:

    @jstevan people are entitled to their opinions bro. If they didn't like the movie they didn't like it. Don't become like one of those DC fanboys who starts complaining that some people didn't like "their movie" or that it's "all on purpose" or some garbage.

     

    Anyways, I'm also entitled to my opinion, and the movie has actually grown on me in the past 48 hours. Not a great movie, but was quite enjoyable. The final 30 minutes were what saved it for me.

    Of course they're entitled but all I read here is pure hate and not argumentative criticism.

     

    2 hours ago, Sean B said:

    Wait, We're the only ones on this forum thread liked this movie after seeing it? Is that what you're saying?

    Apparently.

  2. Seriously, what's with people on this board? In every other place I checked there are different comments about this movie, someone liked it, someone hated it but when I come here it's so much negativity and hate after hate after hate, geeez! What do you people do in life, are you in movie industry or you just eat your junkfood and hate everything that's on silverscreen?

    Cheap costumes? Every critic review I read they praise the costumes even if everything else is bad the costumes are being PRAISED!

    Cheap CGI? I would like some expert to explain what exactly is being cheap and how would they did magical powers in movie, cmon let's read some constructive criticism.

    Charlize is 15minutes in it oh nooo what a catastrophe!!! And when I said that villains don't usually get that much screentime everyone ignored.

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Sean B said:

    I just finished watching a showing of The Huntsman Winter's War in an AMC theater a little while ago. I enjoyed every part of it and It's a big improvement over the first movie.  It's not a slow paced movie that makes your mind wonder with scenes that would be worth being deleted. Which the first movie had that problem whereas this movie doesn't have that problem. The cast were perfect fits for the roles they played in the movie, especially the newest editions to the cast such as Emily Blunt and Jessica Chastain. I was impressed with the CGI more then I thought I would be considering that, the CGI looked somewhat unfinished in the earliest trailers released for this movie and better in the most recent trailers.

    5/5

    Finally someone who liked it beside me.

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, 4815162342 said:

     

    It's not about the screentime itself. It's about how Charlize has been a gigantic focal point in the marketing when in truth

     

      Hide contents

    she's in for a small fraction of the movie, almost all of it at the very end.

     

    It's misleading, which is what people here have hit on.

    Yes but in crucial parts. Personally I watched this movie only for Charlize so naturally I would be pretty disappointed but I wasn't. Thought that she has a perfect timing in this and her acting was better than in the first one.

  5. On 4/20/2016 at 4:26 PM, The Futurist said:

     

    CJohn, do you know that Charlize is literally 


     

      Reveal hidden contents

     

    :lol:

    Spoiler

    She is 15-20min in the movie

    , don't exaggerate pah-lease! And her role is important in the whole movie.

  6. On 4/20/2016 at 3:38 PM, The Futurist said:

     

    I am very easy to please most of the times but this was very average/bad.

     

    It s like they didn't even try.

     

    The movie is also cheap as hell, no scope, cheap sets, vfx, costumes.

     

    I liked the first movie because it was at least visually arresting.

     

    I wouldn't recommend this, I agree with someone who said it s not dumb enough to be fun so it s just dull.

     

    But with this cast of beautiful, talented ladies, I couldn't resist.

    Costumes are cheap to you? I think that costumes and visual look were the best think about it, besides Theron and Blunt...The critics agree that it's beautiful visually and CGI effects are done well, what are you even talking about?!? 

    • Like 1
  7. 4 hours ago, ddddeeee said:

    Alice has a better score, costumes and has a good arc for the main character. HBC does camp better than any of these ladies here who can overact for sure but it's never fun to watch. The 'real world' book-ends in Alice are quite good.

     

    Maleficent is much better looking, has a strong lead performance (regardless of the awful writing for her character) and again has a better score.

     

    What Huntsman has over those movies is that it gets so bad that it can be quite entertaining.

    I detest hamming of HBC.

  8. 15 hours ago, ddddeeee said:

    It's really not. It's more fun but for the wrong reasons. It's probably the worst of all of those. 

    Disagree. What do you find better in terrible Alice CGI mess? Story perhaps? And I really hate Maleficent with a passion, ruined my childhood and one of my favourite animated movies...

    The Huntsman, on the other hand, is one campy & fun fantasy movie, nothing more-nothing less...And it's not trying to be something more like SWATH.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.