boxofficefreak

1) Incredible 2- $138.52 million 2) 3) 4) 5) ........ If Avengers keeps more than 90% of screens, (or less than 200 theater drop) that it's $8.090 million

I like your reaction because it adds intrigue to your response. You're laughing with me....or you're laughing at me. TU edit- you're definitely a WAR+ guy

If we treated forum members with valuations based on their on field performance (content/postings) we can liken the measurements to WAR. Of which there are a greater and greater amount of members who just LOVES to start stupid arguments and spam the shit out of the threads. Lets call them below average value over replacement players (baVORP) After reading the thread prior to the "argument with @empirecity" its clear to me that he didnt directly insult these (baVORP). Rather these (baVORP) added nothing to the discussion other than opinion pieces and incited arguments, hence their rating and classification. In sum, theres evidence that Empirecity (high WAR++) was provoked and didnt directly insult the (baVORP) and might have been thrown out too early. notes - I would consider myself borderline replacement level and maybe (baVORP) from previous warnings

USING CHINA AT $353,784,095 INFINITY OS-C = $969,340,948 China@ $356.25 AVENGER LEGS - $996,209 M $993.705M ULTRON LEGS- $993,887 M $991.36 Notes- WEEKLY GROSSES OS-C 05/21 - 05/27- $32,978,136 05/28- 06/03 - $16,235,761 *Starting to see more volatility in ER for two previous films.

I'm thinking it hits close to 1970M with actuals 13.6 (th-sun) dom + 19.8 weekly os+ 20m china week

Using 953.1M OS-CHINA = 1.287B-333.784M** Avengers legs- $1,007,993,225 Ultron legs- $998,941,703 CHINA @ $332.85M* AVENGERS LEGS ULTRON LEGS OS@ $949.83M* $1.00457 B $0.9955 B CHINA @ $335.57 AVENGERS LEGS ULTRON LEGS OS@ $951.319M $ 1.006B $0.997B *source - numbers.com **source-BOM, chinafilminsider

While you say you're trying to "help" this is the second instance where you nitpicked data and argued over accounting methods. You initiated an argument last week concerning aggregate method accounting vs ema, when the data was readily available and and the interpretation is user's context. I've glanced over your post (tltr) but your main points are "varying" and "fluctuating", right? Wolf Warrior 2 (WW2) Closing wknd 27/10/2017 $6.651853** $6.620050*** YUAN 27/10/17 ER USD 20/10/17 ER USD WW2 5.679Billion* $853,747,069 $857,848,506 If you were correct in your assessment (how BOM is wrong, but you are right) their total OS total would have been any of those two numbers BOM only used "weekly exchange rates" calculation. You are wrong, it's okay. I will just fluctuate my way out of this discussion with you because you're just needlessly repeating yourself. *ENT group **X-rates ***X-rates

Resident expert Ephemeris

Much, much better. Feed us more #s and less tangential nonsense.

"Part 1OS-China actuals" "Possible 3M increase from calculated estimate of 946.2Million. " I cited "Part 1" so..... couldn't you deduce that there could be other iterations? I also mentioned Possible further implying that it could be up for change. Just b/c it seems like you're in the business of "pointing things out", would you happen to guess how multinational firms calculate overseas earnings on financial disclosures? Regarding volatility of exchange rates there's an accounting method of constant currency that's used by firms to establish core earning reports. Constant currency calculated on a consistent manner then further reconciled with GAAP methods allows investors to fully interpret the data. Feel free to look it up and educate yourself so you can nitpick others more eloquently in the future. What your'e saying about BOM is a farce because A) you're implying that the site is explicitly using a fluctuating ER calculation, which is not true. They have a varying exchange rate calculation that's calibrated based on past ER rates for a given period and also updates international OS #s on a recent ER period. .B) They do not only calculate exchange rates on a weekly basis, it's a combination of both. Exhibit1

I'm familiar with how it works. Thanks!

Part 1 OS-CHINA actuals. 1283 Billion - 333.784M China = 949.216M OS-CHINA. Possible 3M increase from calculated estimate of 946.2Million.

If you're accused of trolling by more than a handful of commenters, it might warrant a second assessment. "I wanted the movie to hit 2B and feel tricked and betrayed by the predictions here" "As for my age: I’m young but I’m not that young, old but I’m not that old" Duly noted.. you're older than 10 but below the age of ingenuity

Few q's for you a) how old are you, wondering if you a young professional b). what joy do you get from starting arguments, aggrivation While it's all fun and games to criticize a movie for it's boxoffice blunders/flop. You're inciting strong reactions (trolling) from forum-ers with you schtick. It doesn't seem like you hate/dislike Avengers, but you're clearly lambasting "predictions" made by others when the movie was clearly on a high note after it's huge os/domestic opening weekend. It's one thing to mock/criticize others about failed predictions, but do you really have to do it on so many threads and ruining viewerships from this many fronts ??? The movie is clearly not flopping even with such high expectations. It seems like most people on the board cited 1B OS-C, 2BWW, 400M China expectations while only a handful of forum-ers might forecasted 1.4OS-C, Titanic WW, 500+China in the beginning. What joy do you receive from repeatedly trolling and mocking? I'm hoping you're a younger chap and that you'll learn that just because you're an internet alias and this forum is an open domain, it doesn't mean you can neglect all social etiquette.

We shall see, maybe there's a bump in actuals similar to last weekend. Eurocup def had an effect and world cup coming up in 2.5 weeks. Will be interesting for sure. Avengers Ultron legs - $991.704M Avengers Legs - 1000.690M