nthanh61

Yes it was incredible. For a war movie that is just as bloodied as Saving Private Ryan and American Sniper. I was actually feeling upbeat at the end of the movie and not as shell shock as in SPR or as sad as in AS. I don't know if you all feel the same.

I like this review. I think its a fair assessment of Mel and the movie. No Spoiler. http://theweek.com/articles/657709/mel-gibson-just-made-most-violent-american-film-year-sublime

Wrong thread.

Pre meltdown, I would have counted Mel Gibson in this group. He was one of those actors, that I would have pay to see no matter what the critics said about their movies.

A good interview with Mel. Also, he answers a question about that Viking movie some of you were wondering about. https://www.yahoo.com/tv/mel-gibson-venice-festival-comeback-163638110.html

How could it be more well like than Civil War when CW made over 400 million and SS has barely made 300 mil. Even if SS made 330 mil at the end of its run, that's still 70 mil behind. That's average out to about 3.5 million ticket (if it cost $20 a ticket). I don't see the math behind that.

Bruce Lee was the exception though. Too bad, we haven't had an Asian actor that has the magnetism of Bruce Lee and understand the American audience. Even then, he has to go to Hong Kong before he can make his mark in the US. Jackie Chan & Jet Li made great Hong Kong movies but because of their limited English, it hindered their American movies.

Great top 5 list, Baumer. I have seen most of the movies on this 100 list. Some I have forgotten about until I saw your list. Anyway, thanks for making these lists. I have been writing down the ones I haven't seen and watch them on Netflix on my ride home on the train from work.

You don't know what you're missing. It's a great horror movie without all the gores. Anyway, my kid refuses to watch it too because of them spiders.

I love Brewster's Millions too. It's one of those movies that I watch it every time it's on TV. Also, I think Richard Pryor and Gene Wilder are very funny together. Any of their movies are very funny. Especially, "Stir Crazy" and "See No Evil, Hear No Evil".

I was going to see it with my wife. So it's not good then?

You got that right. I got 4 kids and when they all want to go a certain movies. I wail until Tuesday to take them. We have a Regal Cinema near us. On Tuesday, tickets are 5 dollars, free popcorns, sodas are $2 for any sizes, hot dogs are $1. So if I can spend less than $50 for a family of 6 with popcorns and sodas, that's a great deal. Otherwise, I would not take the whole family out without discount Tuesday.

CA:CW is back to number one. I guess it will stay number 1 today too.

I was so disappointed with what they did to the character of Superman. Having him climbing into the bathtub with Lois Lane. And then having Batman almost kill Sup. That’s not the Superman that I have grown up with. May be I am bias, I am more of a Sup fan than Batman. And among other reasons, I was disappointed with BvS so when I saw how she appeared and kicking butts, I liked her after that. When they cast Gal Gardot , I was pretty much like you, I didn’t think this was the right casting. She was never a stand out in F&F and she is no Lynda Carter (too skinny and not as well developed as Lynda Carter J ). But after, I watched her in BvS, her character grew on me. Not much as far as memorable lines out of her but may be because they made her into this great kick butt character. Just my opinion, will see how she does when the movie come out.

I am a Marvel fan through and through but I have to disagree with you on this. Gal Gardot was a breath of fresh air in BvS. I actually came out of the theater looking forward to seeing Wonder Woman. As far as BvS, all I can say is "Martha".