Jump to content

ThomasNicole

Free Account+
  • Posts

    7,262
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by ThomasNicole

  1. 5 minutes ago, filmnerdjamie said:

    I for one am shocked - SHOCKED - that Film Twitter was dead wrong and the general public didn't come out to support for Melissa Barrera!?

    They wouldn’t come out to support this movie even if she didn’t comment anything lol, look at how disappointing every non-blockbuster movie is performing these days 

     

    Still stupid to fire her from Scream, people clearly loved her and Jenna on that franchise. 
     

    Sadly, in the country of free speech telling the truth is a horrible crime apparently and should be punished even if it derails a stablished rebrand.

    • Like 9
  2. 6 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said:

    Lady Raven is played by his daughter. He made an entire movie for the sole purpose of promoting his daughter's music that's next level nepo babying.

     

    it does look fun though.

    He’s producing the debut movie of his other daughter (Ishana i think), and it looks great.

     

    He couldn’t produce a movie for one daughter and not give something to the other, a good dad!

  3. 44 minutes ago, Paul Verhoeven said:

    The latest trailer has 80k likes. That seems very little. I'm not very optimistic about the box office.

    IMO this franchise appeals mostly to older audiences, maybe it have something to do with it’s low engagement compared to other blockbusters 

     

    That said i agreed that there’s no much reason to expect a boom here. I’m expecting very similar results to Fury Road (which means a considerable drop in admissions).

     

    Just hoping it’s a good movie

     

     

  4. 9 hours ago, dudalb said:

    If by first movie you mean the ultra real remake, I agree. Of course, that is what I think about all the live action/ultra real animation remakes of classic animated films.

    If you mean the 1994 original, you are just wrong,wrong,wrong. It is not my favorite of the Disney animation revival movies, but it damn good.

    Noooo, it’s the remake hahah 

     

    The original is very good, not my favorite either but undeniably good.

  5. The first movie is a souless and stupid waste of time, the still they released for this is awful and yet ... i´m morbidly curious about what Jenkins can put into this [or if he can]

     

    I´m expecting another boring snoozefest, but it wouldn´t completely shock me if this turned out to be those rare surprisingly decent sequels to awful movies [like Ouija 2 from Flanagan]

  6. This is a very tiresome and boring discussion but i have to say ... anyone that watches movies regularly can tell very clearly that this is a musical based on it´s trailers 

     

    Not putting them singing for 3 minutes straight isn´t hiding, there shouldn´t be a discussion about this imo but good for the movie if they can make something so obvious generate arguments 

    • Like 1
  7. 3 hours ago, Firepower said:

    I don't see how dumb fun sequel to such a beloved movie is fine, it's gonna flop even harder if it's as mediocre as Napoleon.

    Napoleon is mediocre because the movie is a snoozefest past it´s first half, i´m not expecting the same here clearly. 

     

    And honestly, this is a beloved movie but it doesn´t have fanbase and people actively overanalyzing it, i´m sure most people from general audiences would be fine with dumb fun if it´s you know... good and well made 

    • Like 1
  8. 81% on RT 

    57 on MC [but there´s a 8/10 missing, so probably 61-62]

     

    Hard to be sure where this will go once more people watch it, but seems like it can still ended up with solid reception. Hope this translate well to it´s box office, i´m still very frustrated about The First Omen

  9. Since there’s nothing concrete to discuss, another rumor around the test screenings just dropped. Same thing, good reactions overall but there’s division about it’s weird tone and performances that doesn’t seems to be the typical comedy. 
     

    Reactions have been good, but not great with general audiences and everyone I’ve spoken to split on Ruffalo’s Trump-like performance and Pattinson’s voice. I can see why Warner Bros isn’t confident in this one, but I did like it.”

  10. 6 minutes ago, Cmasterclay said:

    I heard the movie is movie is simply Okja level weird and offputting but by no means bad. Not a binary, black and white thing why they made this release choice.

    That aligns with the more concrete info about test screenings we had, good reception but offputting and not super commercial neither award bait. 

     

    WB already have a bunch of IP’s with apparently stronger award prospects to release in the next months, maybe January without competition is the best option for it commercially afterall, who knows.

    • Like 1
  11. 5 minutes ago, Maggie said:

    He's talking about the trailer which he saw at CinemaCon

    We really should move on from Sneider, he doesn’t know shit. He was spreading misinformation about Sydney Sweeney like a week ago.
     

    Yeah everyone loved the footage they watched, but Sneider who didn’t see it is the actual reliable source? 
     

    Dude hates Bong, he spend months of his life attacking Parasite during it’s award season and historical Oscar wins. That’s why he’s constantly attacking this movie.
     

    Maybe the movie is indeed bad? Maybe it is, that’s not my point, but there’s no actual reliable info about quality issues, Sneider isn’t a good guy, and good movies can be released in January. Just see M3GAN last year and it’s 94% score in the first week of January.  

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.