LaughingEvans

Name 3 things about its premise that are interesting.

Let's not make comparisons between BoP and Deadpool, the latter was a really popular character even before the movie, and his popularity was not based on trends.

If you think that MCU vs DCEU/DCmovies fanbase wars are bad, I suggest you don't even bother with the idiocy that you can come across in the the marvel comics vs dc comics fanbase wars.

https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/marvel-fans-are-infuriated-about-kevin-feiges-possible-lie.html/ LOL @ this lame journalist attempt to stir the pot. Nobody's infuriated except for maybe 3-4 twitter snowflakes that don't even watch the movies.

"From the studio that brought you Spider-man: Homecoming and Spider-man: Far From Home"

I'd like to see certain WB execs arguing with an AI, especially Jon Peters and the Green Lantern exec that had a hardon for aircrafts.

On behalf of the British people, I apologise for this number.

This is Colin Trevorrow right now

TROS is the bomb that keeps on bombing. Perhaps Disney will have to release the George Lucas cut to make a profit.

Agree, I went in without even seeing a trailer and was taken by surprise on how good it is. I wonder if the story is inspired at all by Franzese's confessions.

I haven't seen this level of debate since kindergarten.

His perspective is perfectly logical. Disney/stakeholders surely can't be happy with a movie underperforming and a brand diminishing. From a non-stakeholder POV, yes, great achievemens, but from the POV of someone who's been promised great returns to their investment, it doesn't matter how many movies achieved the same or not.

guns are not electronic, they are mechanical. so if cars and trains are not going haywire, neither will guns.

But most of them didn't know about it. Then again, if it takes him like 10 years and that entire mumbo jumbo from HP4 to come back fully, it's worth gunning him down once every 10 years, just to make sure.

I don't get how Harry Potter was so popular. Why didn't they just shoot Voldemort?

It just dawned on me that TROS OW is not even half of Endgame's OW, and it's highly unlikely that its total WW will not beat Endgame's OW WW.

I'm starting to believe that Rian Johnson has multiple alias accounts on this forum.

Because they moved on. As @Deep Wang said, 1 movie cannot easily hurt an entire established franchise. What turned a lot of fans and non-fans off was the constant bickering between the fans and RJ/Disney/media that went on for months.

My rankings for star wars 1. The Empire Strikes Back 2.A New Hope 3.Return of the Jedi 4.Revenge of the Sith 5. Rogue One 6. The Force Awakens 7. The Phantom Menace 8. Solo 9. Attack of the Clones 10. Rise of Skywalker 11.Holiday Special 12.The Last Jedi

4 billion property + well over a billion in production + whatever are the marketing costs. Let's say 5,5 billion. From the box office you have 5,5 billion, but Disney would get around 50-60% domestic and 30% OS (cause someone's gotta pay for Buena Vista). It's definitely lower than 3 billion. Now merch and licensing, that can easily surpass the box office sales, but you have to account that Disney would get even less there, as for the most part they are not involved in the production/distribution, and the profits have to be shared with other giants like Hasbro and EA. The theme parks have not been very successful, and the streaming service is definitely not just star wars, so it's not easy to measure. Compared to other acquisitions like Pixar and Marvel, it's just not justifying the 4 billion investment, granted always that it's on decline.

Nor TROS neither TLJ are bombs, but the whole trilogy technically is. This was a 4 billion investment.

Is it too early for my "AMATW WW > TROS WW" club? 😁

https://www.comicbookmovie.com/sci-fi/star_wars/making-a-star-wars-film-is-difficult-due-to-a-lack-of-comics-and-novels-says-lucasfilm-president-a171739 Kathleen Kennedy finally admits that she and her team are creatively bankrupt.

*4 terminator bombs in a row* *acts surprised*