Wouldn't this have same problem as that? Less characters than that, so, could have less places to follow but other problems still remain. Only for handful of critics, 85-90 is my range.
Read the discussion again. He understood what others are saying. It's great you want to look after new members but sometimes you get too biased towards them. You are missing the whole point. He asked Charlie to stop changing predictions based on data. I told him that's not how it works. Simple as that. No idea why you are telling me about lack of his english knowledge or BO knowledge when it has nothing to do with it.
But terrestrial, I didn't comment about that. After his first comment, people explained to him, and after 2nd, 3rd too. He commented 7 times after that again. 1,2 comments are enough, that many is annoying.
Cal down dude. Let the experts predict. No body is here to please you. Changing predictions is part of the process, don't comment if you just want to see it play it out.
Yes. Their marketing budgets are not 1x or even 2x of production budget like a normal film. Get Out was estimated to have $80m p&a, correct me if I am wrong. US, conjuring, Annabelle movies would have been same too.
$300m OW would be crazy and mind-blowing even if many jumped on the train. IW did more than people were expecting, and expectations for these are already beyond sky. But most are expecting this to do $700m-$800m dom and $2.2b to $2.45b WW. Lower range would be amazing too but can this be bigger? As charlie said earlier, we are predicting based on IW, but what if this is whole different beast.