Jump to content

Wingzero505

New Member
  • Content Count

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Likes

About Wingzero505

  • Rank
    Rumored Project

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. That would be stupid, i have no idea why people keep bringing that up. Marvel was bought for 4B when the highest grossing film they had was the first Iron Man, Pixar 7.4B and Fox is looking to be upwards of 50B, according your point Fox will never be profitable. Taking into account studio acquisitions when calculating box-office is pointless. Compared to the rest of the acquisitions getting Lucasfilm for 4B is an absolute steal. Spielberg getting a big cut makes sense because he owns the rights.
  2. Disney doesn't have Spielberg taking 35% of the profits with him. Keep in mind the first one with a 650M gross and 1.6B total had 474M profit (surprisingly only a 57M difference between JW and TLJ) with an insane 200M for payouts to talent. This one's profit for the studio should be less than 300M.
  3. Thanks, was lurking the forums for a few months and decided to join now.
  4. Hell nah, giving a year's subscription to a start-up service that may or may not be around after a while definitely sounds like a bad idea.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.