Wingzero505
-
Posts
4 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by Wingzero505
-
-
1 hour ago, a2k said:
JW2 could do 330 dom + 200 china + 520 os-china = 1050 ww
1050 would be 6.2x the 170 prod budget. TLJ would have to do close to 1600 ww to have the same multiplier.
I know there are other forms of revenue streams and metrics, but just saying...
Theatrical revenue could be approx,
330*0.55 = 181.5 dom
200*0.25 = 50 china
520*0.33 = 171.6 os
181.5 + 50 + 171.6 = 403.1 ... with all of non-theatrical revenue to follow.
Disney doesn't have Spielberg taking 35% of the profits with him. Keep in mind the first one with a 650M gross and 1.6B total had 474M profit (surprisingly only a 57M difference between JW and TLJ) with an insane 200M for payouts to talent. This one's profit for the studio should be less than 300M.
- 2
-
8 hours ago, DeeCee said:
Yes. I noticed that.
Welcome to the forums.
Thanks, was lurking the forums for a few months and decided to join now.
-
Quote
Billed Annually
Hell nah, giving a year's subscription to a start-up service that may or may not be around after a while definitely sounds like a bad idea.
- 2
JURASSIC WORLD: FALLEN KINGDOM | 22 JUN 2018 | Universal | J.A. Bayona to direct | The Park is Closed | NOT THE FRANCHISE WARS THREAD
in Box Office Discussion
Posted
That would be stupid, i have no idea why people keep bringing that up. Marvel was bought for 4B when the highest grossing film they had was the first Iron Man, Pixar 7.4B and Fox is looking to be upwards of 50B, according your point Fox will never be profitable. Taking into account studio acquisitions when calculating box-office is pointless. Compared to the rest of the acquisitions getting Lucasfilm for 4B is an absolute steal.
Spielberg getting a big cut makes sense because he owns the rights.