google-site-verification=EzRt-ZmNlc4J5RNLXiuJpAEGjNviG678nNB1w49cgZg Jump to content


Gold Account
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Days Won


terrestrial last won the day on April 26 2020

terrestrial had the most liked content!

Community Reputation


About terrestrial

  • Rank
    movie business ww fan
  • Birthday August 22

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Interests
    people's stories, movies/books/..., technic, science, old +/or foreign cultures, DIY, ...

    I am trying to live following those three ~ mindsets
    “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein
    “You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.” - Harlan Ellison
    "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly, one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts." - Sherlock Holmes
    “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire
    “One always speaks badly when one has nothing to say.” - Voltaire = see bad politicians getting their seats by being polemic and worse
    “It is one of the superstitions of the human mind to have imagined that virginity could be a virtue.” Voltaire = see how normal it seems to be to judge gender differently, and to judge the freedom of the possibility of changing the choice
    “Opinions have caused more ills than the plague or earthquakes on this little globe of ours.” - Voltaire = see misused freedom of speech
    “A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” - Mark Twain

Recent Profile Visitors

6,229 profile views
  1. Thank you, so many points I struggle to find the words are explained by you in the typical for you so much ore clear fashion than I manage to do so (I think I botched up a few tries). So much better... ❤️
  2. see, the that is, what I try to convey, its in the wording that not all behave in the same way, if they behave in a certain way, than.... but there is also a chance of... And that is, what I am really writing here about, to point out the too absolute wordings are implying a wrong picture, a wording including the possible exceptions shows a more complete or even complete picture. Btw, pointing this out repeatedly does not mean I follow any of the given points at all, its solely about adding the missing parts, the balanced presentation. edit: forgot to add, its a good example, the more often than not. To have it there like it is vs to conclude its ok to dismiss them based on that altogether, that would be wrong again, especially whilst its still happening, see history subject/school, that can be done for past ‘events’ like eg all of the .... were .... so only that... did happen. Hindsight of history
  3. You miss 95%+ of my points, focus probably on the dressing instead of the essence
  4. again, its NOT about what the scientists or governments did what when or why, its about how not involved into all the decisions non-scientists word judgments, too absolute solutions, dates of the future.... I see different news, I look into who is the owner of which news outlet and many more details, including which ‘interviewed’ scientist (some do not have the time to do those, some - especially some of the ones not even working at a solution seemingly are not willing to stop to try to get heard) is even working eg with explicit the virus and which not (see my earlier example, a general doctor counts more than a private person, but someone who worked for ~ 20y explicit at SARS in an International group working together since I think it was 2002 counts more than someone only starting with the ‘theme’. Add vaccine creating specialists, all add to the sum, changed situation, shortages of supplies, fire, weather, different seasons per location, different median ages, tons of details playing into why at some places this works better and why at other places that works better, and so on. General statements ignore that, start with too many too fast expectations, people getting wrong ideas, leading to unrest based on wrong ‘expectations’. Means the scientists opinions differ still, the opinions about possible dangers in especial get weighted quiet differently, I read both sides and a lot in between and do not presume to be able to judge what is right, even less what is right for another region. And that is, what I do criticize here, too much focus on local situations, too much focus on the earliest possible date, too much focus on scientists or news on once preferred version, and too much judgment about other location’s situation based on own’s location situation. In my POV every general statement, like it will be over eg in 2021 ignores worldwide, does not count on it will not be over as long as its not over everywhere. If variants will appear to slow it down or not we can not know, but we do know about the possibility of it, so not only for that reason the wordings should IMHO reflect that, like ~ if all will went ideal, nothing happens, then we can hope for.... whatever it is. Beside that scientists change their opinions matching to new data, new data does not emerge within one day, the situation is not finished, but still people try the find ~ judgements like in a history subject in school. Way too early.
  5. We don‘t have them (I think), but I am still down for Cinefex‘s actual issue will be the last one
  6. I do not speak about governments’ local decisions, I speak about non-scientists speaking in in my POV too absolute ways about themes the scientists still are not sure about, as even if there are strong indications, as long as its not a finalized conclusion, there can not be an absolute conclusion, less so by non-scientific based social media users
  7. Btw, early in Februar the death count in my county was 4 times of the death count of the first wave (both seen as separate counts, means sum is higher) Over half of new infections are still happening per private meets. Way too many still do not want to get the vaccine, good for me, I might get it months earlier, bad for the worldwide situation
  8. I think that is what too many fast fast fast people miss or want to miss or dismiss without any scientific reason to dismiss it
  9. Thinking about if Disney might start (after the situation is back to somewhat normal worldwide) to use their eg Disney+ platform to use for eg trailers too, in especial trailer for franchises within their franchise tabs. Or things like making of-trailer mixes, some specials. Short but filled with real info, not someone talking and talking with only short really new details. Like something called cinema-news / cinema-talk or whatever. Maybe make a monthly news thing out of it, but not a big one over all departments, or split those up i to the franchises again, not all will want to watch eg Disney Park news if not into Parks. Worldwide it could in theory help eg their animated movies, ‚Disney Princess‘-titles, but also Star Wars, MCU... You‘ll might reach people being already into it on point that might have either missed it or not realize some interesting aspect of an upcoming movie that might give the final push to watch it in a cinema. Might. Like add buttons for trailers at the home side/page or even within the franchises of other franchises soon to be released, but a lot more within the franchises. At least I guess that is what I‘d look into, if legally possible and the specialists think its money-wise making sense Just a thought, out of the little tidbits we get here, how much at least some of us are waiting for them
  10. Just realized we have a 6 split system and a 4 split system for who gets in which group, seems to depend where you live here. I am in group 4 of the 6-split system, but its possible school... will get moved into group 3 acc to today’s news Just in case people see articles about Germany, I can imagine that detail could lead to confusion.
  11. capacity here is way too slow too, see at one hand not enough, and on the other hand the refusing to take one of the once actually available. My husband is too old for it (all 65y and older wont get it), he will have to wait probably till summer or autumn for his shot (he is group 4, but as over 65y...) I might have a chance for it as I am also group 4 (see summer/autumn), but as I am not 65y yet I might get it earlier, as not all of group 1 did signed up in my region, they started to release several calls for group 2 and 3 to please sign up. Depending on how many follow that.... In my county there is only on vaccine version, no other version arrived here (rural region) I am in group 4 not for the age like my husband, but for working at a school Fingers crossed
  12. not sure, as they might miss that kind of input, see one-sided information gatherings Personally I think if someone want to get the vaccine its stupid to say no to one vaccine with good results for (in the most cases) side effects for only a day or so, even if seemingly quiet a lot of those are strong reactions in the meaning high fever....
  13. I do think there will be more opposition too, bit not all Its a thing of too absolute wording, like all obedience will be gone = that will be definitely not correct as I know enough people who still will follow, even out of those whose financial existence / security (term?) is in great danger - like going under without any remaining retirement savings.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.