Sam Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 The Heat is having a great run, keep on having good increases and smaller drops. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted July 25, 2013 Author Share Posted July 25, 2013 For a movie like the Conjuring that cost so little to make, 4.5M is pretty damn good.. Please Hollywood, do not make a sequel to this, even though you will... Sequel is locked and loaded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baumer Posted July 25, 2013 Author Share Posted July 25, 2013 1 THE CONJURING Warner Bros. 2,903 $5,536,412 -49.5% / $1,907 $47,391,738 / 4 $5,603,104 +1.2% / $1,930 $52,994,842 / 5 $4,517,407 -19.4% / $1,556 $57,512,249 / 6 N/A 2 DESPICABLE ME 2 Universal 3,820 $3,457,100 -53.4% / $905 $279,463,495 / 20 $4,354,800 +26% / $1,140 $283,818,295 / 21 $3,361,405 -22.8% / $880 $287,179,700 / 22 N/A 3 TURBO Fox 3,806 $2,703,770 -56.2% / $710 $33,719,154 / 6 $3,530,415 +30.6% / $928 $37,249,569 / 7 $2,604,547 -26.2% / $684 $39,854,116 / 8 N/A 4 GROWN UPS 2 Sony / Columbia 3,491 $2,752,489 -50.8% / $788 $82,140,515 / 11 $3,237,944 +17.6% / $928 $85,378,459 / 12 $2,431,053 -24.9% / $696 $87,809,512 / 13 N/A 5 PACIFIC RIM Warner Bros. 3,285 $2,052,186 -58.3% / $625 $70,334,709 / 11 $2,478,451 +20.8% / $754 $72,813,160 / 12 $1,902,467 -23.2% / $579 $74,715,627 / 13 N/A 6 RED 2 Lionsgate/Summit 3,016 $1,899,809 -60.5% / $630 $19,948,231 / 4 $2,360,233 +24.2% / $783 $22,308,464 / 5 $1,768,764 -25.1% / $586 $24,077,228 / 6 N/A 7 R.I.P.D. Universal 2,852 $1,468,780 -55% / $515 $14,160,195 / 4 $1,811,020 +23.3% / $635 $15,971,215 / 5 $1,311,920 -27.6% / $460 $17,283,135 / 6 N/A 8 THE HEAT Fox 2,689 $1,202,793 -54% / $447 $130,474,017 / 25 $1,468,662 +22.1% / $546 $131,942,679 / 26 $1,227,300 -16.4% / $456 $133,169,979 / 27 N/A 9 MONSTERS UNIVERSITY Buena Vista 2,186 $792,520 -49% / $363 $249,906,652 / 32 $1,033,606 +30.4% / $473 $250,940,258 / 33 $837,117 -19% / $383 $251,777,375 / 34 N/A 10 WORLD WAR Z Paramount 2,066 $720,006 -53.1% / $349 $187,652,614 / 32 $876,430 +21.7% / $424 $188,529,044 / 33 $695,384 -20.7% / $337 $189,224,428 / 34 N/A 11 THE LONE RANGER Buena Vista 2,273 $569,166 -54.9% / $250 $81,860,456 / 20 $677,260 +19% / $298 $82,537,716 / 21 $569,085 -16% / $250 $83,106,801 / 22 N/A 12 WHITE HOUSE DOWN Sony / Columbia 1,454 $301,601 -54.6% / $207 $68,754,476 / 25 $368,005 +22% / $253 $69,122,481 / 26 $307,639 -16.4% / $212 $69,430,120 / 27 N/A 13 MAN OF STEEL Warner Bros. 1,050 $253,352 -55.6% / $241 $285,253,826 / 39 $321,028 +26.7% / $306 $285,574,854 / 40 $252,156 -21.5% / $240 $285,827,010 / 41 N/A 14 THE WAY, WAY BACK Fox Searchlight 304 $236,963 -61.6% / $779 $4,829,855 / 18 $280,704 +18.5% / $923 $5,110,559 / 19 $251,654 -10.3% / $828 $5,362,213 / 20 N/A 15 KEVIN HART: LET ME EXPLAIN Lionsgate/Summit 748 $229,137 -57.7% / $306 $30,176,154 / 20 $226,834 -1% / $303 $30,402,988 / 21 $180,419 -20.5% / $241 $30,583,407 / 22 N/A 16 THIS IS THE END Sony / Columbia 622 $173,342 -49.4% / $279 $94,603,255 / 41 $202,338 +16.7% / $325 $94,805,593 / 42 $161,752 -20.1% / $260 $94,967,345 / 43 N/A - FRUITVALE STATION Weinstein Company 34 $91,557 -59.3% / $2,693 $1,423,254 / 11 $84,436 -7.8% / $2,483 $1,507,690 / 12 $84,502 +0.1% / $2,485 $1,592,192 / 13 N/A - NOW YOU SEE ME Lionsgate/Summit 333 $62,546 -48.2% / $188 $114,473,254 / 53 $81,005 +29.5% / $243 $114,554,259 / 54 $75,591 -6.7% / $227 $114,629,850 / 55 N/A - EPIC Fox 319 $61,963 -43.2% / $194 $105,657,164 / 60 $79,915 +29% / $251 $105,737,079 / 61 $71,229 -10.9% / $223 $105,808,308 / 62 N/A - STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS Paramount 250 $55,525 -50.7% / $222 $225,176,491 / 68 $62,921 +13.3% / $252 $225,239,412 / 69 $58,095 -7.7% / $232 $225,297,507 / 70 N/A - THE GREAT GATSBY (2013) Warner Bros. 302 $51,031 -50% / $169 $143,715,059 / 74 $62,960 +23.4% / $208 $143,778,019 / 75 $56,034 -11% / $186 $143,834,053 / 76 N/A - FAST & FURIOUS 6 Universal 279 $43,245 -53.7% / $155 $237,164,470 / 60 $50,220 +16.1% / $180 $237,214,690 / 61 $46,035 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grim22 Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 (edited) Sequel is locked and loaded. It is weird, everyone laments the fact that there are no new and original properties, then the few original movies which make it big start having their own sequels and launch franchises. I am actually really happy that Pacific Rim may not get a sequel due to the domestic BO not being robust. I felt that the movie wrapped up everything beautifully and works as a stand alone movie with no need for a sequel. MoS as well, wrapped up all plotlines in the one movie while leaving plenty of threads it could pick up in the sequels. Edited July 25, 2013 by grim22 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Craig Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 So PR will do better than WHD....and Conjuring will do better than both. Who had that club again??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 If Wolverine pulls 75-80M OW, then we should seriously reconsider the ranking of most popular super-heroes. Also, X3 had the 2nd biggest OD at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockNrollaDIM Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 My showing for The Heat is packed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainJackSparrow Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Watching Batman 1989. Man, was Jack Nicholsan a bad choice for the role! (suprisingly) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainJackSparrow Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 (edited) Oh my Lord. The 1989 film was awful!! (Batman) Edited July 26, 2013 by KingKong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bballman24 Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Ever seen Bad Boys 2? How about Point Break? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Craig Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Watching Batman 1989. Man, was Jack Nicholsan a bad choice for the role! (suprisingly) Every entertainment trade of the time, the box office and fandom at the time would strongly disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainJackSparrow Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Every entertainment trade of the time, the box office and fandom at the time would strongly disagree.Well it's aged badly IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichWS Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Well it's aged badly IMO. The film itself hasn't aged well, but I don't think his performance has. It's still great fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blankments Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Watching Batman 1989. Man, was Jack Nicholsan a bad choice for the role! (suprisingly) I actually really like Batman 89 despite watching it for the first time last year. I wish Turbo was doing better; it's a pretty fun movie. Better than DM2 for sure. That said, the best part of the movie was the HTTYD2 trailer on the big screen. Gave me goosebumps! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainJackSparrow Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Batman Forever> Batman 1989. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainJackSparrow Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Well, this leaves me with Batman Returns and B&R to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarSaber Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 I actually really like Batman 89 despite watching it for the first time last year. I wish Turbo was doing better; it's a pretty fun movie. Better than DM2 for sure. That said, the best part of the movie was the HTTYD2 trailer on the big screen. Gave me goosebumps! You just had to say that. Now I HAVE to see it... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blankments Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Batman Forever> Batman 1989. I mean, Forever has Jim Carrey... and not much else; 89 has Nicholson and Keaton. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainJackSparrow Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 I mean, Forever has Jim Carrey... and not much else; 89 has Nicholson and Keaton. Nicholson is terrible here!!!! Also Tommy Lee Jones is in Forever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolioD1 Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 I have batman at #3 on my top 100 list. No shame. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...