grim22 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 I don't think all actors will be needed for six months. Ben Affleck is supposed to start prepping his Whitey Bulger movie in fall as well. The Affleck Bulger movie has been delayed, the Johnny Depp one will beat it to production: http://www.deadline.com/2014/02/berlin-johnny-depp-seals-deal-to-play-whitey-bulger-in-black-mass-tom-hardy-in-talks-to-play-fbi-pal-john-connolly/ Affleck only has the adaptation of Live By Night, and that isn't prepping till December as per recent reports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leyla Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 (edited) hmm but Jesse plays a baddie so hopefully he doesnt need that much shooting time like 'the heroes' At leat i hold out hope As for Justice League he may not be a villain there or not the only one who kows It'd be pretty sad if Jesse isnt in the sequel. 3 Horsemen wouldnt be as good as 4 thats for sure & without a leader There could be a lot of great developement for them in the sequel cause the 1st film really didnt show much backstory & was more dedicated to the chase itself Id love to see more of Merritt/Atlas banter & stuff. They have great chem with Woody also Atlas/Henley are pretty popular & i dont think the writers will just let it be that the most popular character from the original just disappears hmm Maybe reduced screentime will be the solution Anyway I really hope it works out for this film Edited February 10, 2014 by Tauriel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
23IsEverywhere Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 In the beginning when people were guessing the name they missed the obvious one... Now You Don't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 So is this for summer 2015? Isn't September kinda late or it's perfectly fine since this is not really vfx-heavy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 (edited) So is this for summer 2015? Isn't September kinda late or it's perfectly fine since this is not really vfx-heavy? Perfectly fine. I also thing they will probably release it outside the Summer. Maybe October? Edited February 10, 2014 by CJohn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowGuardian Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 When are they going to offically announce that the title of this is now you dont Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Perfectly fine. I also thing they will probably release it outside the Summer. Maybe October? October is okay. How about August? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leyla Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Id still prefer summer as some counterprogramming to blockbuster just like they did with the 1st Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 Will Leterrier direct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bapi Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 No. Just Exec. Producer. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tufftuff Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 Smaller studios have a smaller pool of hit movies to make sequels from. That's why you get Red 2 for example. This had a 4x multiplier so why not try for a sequel. I'm sure it sold well on home video Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fancyarcher Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 (edited) Smaller studios have a smaller pool of hit movies to make sequels from. That's why you get Red 2 for example. This had a 4x multiplier so why not try for a sequel. I'm sure it sold well on home video Red 2 flopped. Edited February 13, 2014 by Fancyarcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Panda Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) The first wasn't good, neither will the second. But then again if you know me, I typically hate everything. Edited February 14, 2014 by The Panda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 I like the first one but mainly because of the cast. The plot was dumb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Panda Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 I like the first one but mainly because of the cast. The plot was dumb I like the cast, but that doesn't make the movie good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 I like the cast, but that doesn't make the movie good. the cast made the movie enjoyable for me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fancyarcher Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 I like the cast, but that doesn't make the movie good. Sometimes the performances can make a movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leyla Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 No. Just Exec. Producer. is it 100% set in stone?? then we may inded have a Red 2 situation I really held out hope for Louie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowhite Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 I like the cast, but that doesn't make the movie good.Cause i feel it wasn't. Felt like two hours of "omg were so clever!"Yet I still ended up liking the movie even if I didn't care for most of it...just cause I liked the end plot twist (I didn't even bother trying to reason whether it made sense, that's just liking the cast doing it's job).That being said...I don't think it was a good movie. I have no real faith in a sequel.But you, with that multiplier...might as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leyla Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 (edited) Franco drops some info during the Neighbours promo Last I heard, we were still going at the end of this year. … I’ve heard a pitch of the story. It’s actually going to be really exciting. I was slightly weary, just because you never know when it comes to a sequel. But I think the first one opened up enough avenues. There are many directions left to explore. There are many places that it can go, and they really – they held true to the spirit of the first one, but it’s going to be enough of a departure that it doesn’t just feel like a complete copy of the first one." Franco went on to explain that a big portion of Now You See Me 2 will be spent exploring who this tight-knit band of illusionists really are off of the stage. As he mentions, they spent so much time in the first movie on a stage, in various states of performance, and the team now wants to figure out who they are as individuals – and likely, who they can scam next. Who will be back for Now Your See Me 2 (or, Now You Still See Me)? Louis Leterrier is scheduled to return to the director’s chair. Most of the original cast is expected to return, while Deadline reported in February that locations will shift to Europe and Asia to capitalize on the first film’s international successes. http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Now-You-See-Me-2-Expected-Start-Filming-Later-Year-42844.html No script yet tho so there may be a delay http://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/dave-franco-now-you-see-me-2-script/ Edited June 3, 2014 by Tauriel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...