bapi Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Intl. Gravity VS Life of Pi (OW): Russia 8.1m 10.7m Germany 3.8m 6.1m Australia 3.2m 5.2m Itlay 2.6m 1m Spain 2.3m 2.3m Taiwan 1m 2.2m HK 1m 1.4m Gravity OWs (19.7m) is 68% of that (28.9m) of Pi in the 7 markets available above. Pi averaged multipliers over 7 intls. Pi has 90M from China? 68% and without 90M from China... Gravity would finish with 240M OS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
efialtes76 Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 $8.1m in Russia? No way! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vc2002 Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 (edited) OS LoP is a tough goal even to begin with. Legs will decide how far Gravity can go. Hopefully its relatively stronger DOM take could make up for the OS performance so WW it could make as much as LoP. Suppose 250m DOM for Gravity, it only needs 350m OS to make 600m WW. And a China release is badly needed, both for the boxoffice and the Chinese fans. Edited October 6, 2013 by vc2002 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halba Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 (edited) theres no china release. this wont have life of pi legs os. 400s WW that is all. its not getting 250m DOM. this is because its ow was huge for an oscar film, it will cut its multiplier. Edited October 6, 2013 by Halba Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Life of Pi had Christmas/Oscars. Gravity won't have any of them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halba Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 (edited) Life of Pi had Christmas/Oscars. Gravity won't have any of them. agreed. looks in the mid 400s ww for this one. Edited October 6, 2013 by Halba Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peludo Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Life of Pi had Christmas/Oscars. Gravity won't have any of them. Agree that it will not have Christmas, but Oscars? If technically is so good as it is said (I still have not seen it), it will have some nominations/wins as Life of Pi had for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 OS LoP is a tough goal even to begin with. Legs will decide how far Gravity can go. Hopefully its relatively stronger DOM take could make up for the OS performance so WW it could make as much as LoP. Suppose 250m DOM for Gravity, it only needs 350m OS to make 600m WW. And a China release is badly needed, both for the boxoffice and the Chinese fans. Only needs 350m ? 350m is a lot. For Gravity, It is even not certain whether its DOM gross or OS gross will be bigger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
druv10 Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Life of Pi had Christmas/Oscars. Gravity won't have any of them. Not true. It'll get bumps from noms first and any possible wins. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 LoP overperformed internationally, Gravity overperformed domestically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Not true. It'll get bumps from noms first and any possible wins. By the time it gets the Oscars, its runs in most places will be pretty much long over. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatrickvD Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 That's easy to explain. Both Bullock and Clooney are only big in America. The two are not A-listers internationally. They have limited draw power outside DOM. Maybe in China. Where I live Clooney and Bullock are as big and A-list as it gets. Just because they never star in big-budget blockbuster projects doesn't mean they don't have star quality. They're fucking Bullock and Clooney. It doesn't get any bigger than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Maybe in China. Where I live Clooney and Bullock are as big and A-list as it gets. Just because they never star in big-budget blockbuster projects doesn't mean they don't have star quality. They're fucking Bullock and Clooney. It doesn't get any bigger than that. One place doesnt matter. Was talking overally. Box office says all. Bullock only has one 200M+ OS grosser in her 20+ years career. And that movie is Speed in 1994 with Reeves. She has 4 other 100M+ OS grosser and that's all. Her Oscar winner Blinded Side only did 53M OS, which is plain awful for a movie with 250m dom take. Clooney only has two Ocean's movies over 200M+ OS, mainly thanks to Brad Pitt. Outside the three Ocean's, he only has 1 100+ os movies. Even Adam Sandler, who has a dozen of 100m+ os grossing movies, is not considered A-lister internationally, let alone America-exclusive stars Bullock and Clooney. Ben Stiller is not A-lister internationally too. Jim Carrey was though, the only Amercian comdey actor ever to become A-lister OS. Real A-lister international stars like Smith, Depp and Cruise each have tons of 200M+ OS movies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Bullock and Clooney America-only? That is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever read. Bullock and Clooney are big in the right project. These weird theories by firedeep leave me shocked. This isn't the type of movie that appeals too much OS. That is the problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Bullock and Clooney America-only? That is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever read. Bullock and Clooney are big in the right project. These weird theories by firedeep leave me shocked.This isn't the type of movie that appeals too much OS. That is the problem.Sorry he is right . Bullock and Clooney are total non factors overseas 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Sorry he is right . Bullock and Clooney are total non factors overseas :rofl: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
druv10 Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 By the time it gets the Oscars, its runs in most places will be pretty much long over. I can see WB with an expansion for Gravity after noms and any possible wins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 :rofl: Believe what you want to believe. Clooney and Bullock are not massive stars overseas . Clooney has never had a big hit overseas outside of Oceans which had a little actor named Brad Pitt in them and Bullock outside of Speed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Before WWZ everyone was saying Pitt was not a big factor OS and that the Oceans movies were hits because of the assemble cast. Now everyone says Oceans success was Pitt's fault. LOL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 Before WWZ everyone was saying Pitt was not a big factor OS and that the Oceans movies were hits because of the assemble cast. Now everyone says Oceans success was Pitt's fault. LOL.Not me. Always thought it was obvious Pitt was an OS draw. I'm not one of those guys that said Tatum was a bigger draw than Pitt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
