Jump to content

Neo

Star Trek Beyond | 7.22.2016 | Not an Oscar winner.

Recommended Posts



STB has now grossed $320m WW. I'm thinking it will probably end it's run around $335m. not so great. but there will... probably be a sequel, I hope.  It doesn't have any major territories to release in does it? thank goodness for China, it would have been a complete trainwreck overseas if it weren't for that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites





On 9/21/2016 at 5:58 PM, Treecraft said:

This was a much more innocent & enjoyable movie than the other blockbusters we've had this summer, shame it flopped Underperformed

It underperformed domestically. Flop is reserved for movies way, way, way off the mark like an Alice 2 or Huntsman 2. Plus, it's overseas bolstered it so in the end for sure not a flop.

 

After all these years we still have educating to do for users on the differences in classification. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Captain Craig said:

It underperformed domestically. Flop is reserved for movies way, way, way off the mark like an Alice 2 or Huntsman 2. Plus, it's overseas bolstered it so in the end for sure not a flop.

 

After all these years we still have educating to do for users on the differences in classification. 

It flopped at the box office. Home media sales should make it break even in the long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





1 hour ago, That One Chris Pratt said:

This is sad... :sadben:

 

My curse is spreading...it affected this and just recently had Mag 7 underperform, and it'll likely miss 100M as a result.  Miss Pergrine's...Deepwater Horizon....don't let me down :sadben: 

How did Magnificent 7 underperform?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



27 minutes ago, That One Chris Pratt said:

 

It performed similar to The Equalizer, while this had the benefit of Pratt, Hawke, and a more well-known property.

westerns generally do not perform very well, I would hardly call Mag7 a "well known property" given that most people going to see it weren't even born when the original was released.

Ethan Hawke is not, and never has been, a box office draw, and Chris Pratt's power is completely untested.

It did fine, slightly better than I expected.

Edited by Treecraft
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites







On 9/25/2016 at 0:02 PM, filmlover said:

Re: That One Chris Pratt

 

People are kinda putting too much weight on Pratt's shoulders. Remember that nobody even knew who he was 3 years ago. Movie stars don't happen overnight.

 

He's getting paid and treated like a movie star/big draw and he's getting parts like one so it's fair if he's scrutinized like one. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





6 minutes ago, TalismanRing said:

 

 

That is a quick a turnaround for a major film and it's surprisingly opening on Home Video in the middle of other titles around the the same size (GB and X-men)

 

Maybe they want to beat the slew of sci fi movies coming out soon?  I think it will do well, whenever it comes out, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Honestly, just re-watched this one, now at home and damn, it holds up so well. The sabotage scene might be the most fun scene in a blockbuster this year, simply sublime fun.

 

The movie is so beautiful to look at too, wow. The VFX is simply some of the most amazing work I've seen in a film, ever. That space station is indeed a beauty to behold.

 

This movie deserved more, much more. I'll be incredibly sad if we don't get a sequel.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.