Neo Posted November 3, 2013 Author Share Posted November 3, 2013 (edited) At this point both of those movies should be filed under "I'll believe them when I see them". It's possible one of them will make the current release date, though it's probably just as likely that neither of them will. There's pretty much a 0% chance that both of them will though. Same can be said for ST3 or any movie that hasn't started production yet. Maybe on ID4-2, but can't see T5 missing as of now. Still overload with T5/ST3 for one weekend. Another thing T5 is Paramount same as ST3, T5 would need to move. Edited November 3, 2013 by Neo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goffe Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 I hope they continue the Klingon war plot that they started in STiD 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilmac Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 If this gets pushed; 2015 may not be the mega summer it was shaping up to be... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goffe Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 I really hope this is for 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stingray Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Good choice for director. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted November 4, 2013 Author Share Posted November 4, 2013 If this gets pushed; 2015 may not be the mega summer it was shaping up to be... You mean ST3? Gets pushed from when? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CloneWars Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 2016 makes the most sense with it being the 50th anniversary and all. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kvikk Lunsj Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 I have a feeling this be rushed for a 2015 spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Craig Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Shouldn't this thread be called Star Trek 13? (Since, you know, it's the 13th ST movie. The presence of old Leonard Nimoy indicates that they are in fact all part of the same multiverse.) It's exactly how I refer to it in shorthand. The continuity aspect of Leonard Nimoy's Spock keeps it rooted back to the "Prime ST Universe" just like the episodes were anchored there anytime they went to the Mirror Mirror Universe. This offshoot universe is no different as I see it and I'm hoping at some point we loop back, somehow, someway either using Shatner/Kirk or the Bajoran Wormhole to bring Sisko out from being with the "prophets". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blankments Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Hope this is for 2016, not '15 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Founder / Operator Shawn Robbins Posted November 6, 2013 Founder / Operator Share Posted November 6, 2013 Hope this is for 2016, not '15 I think it's a safe bet it will be, unless they take a holiday 2015 spot--but the only way that happens is if Disney doesn't put Star Wars there. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 'Star Trek 3' to have smaller budget than 'Into Darkness?' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 I think it's a safe bet it will be, unless they take a holiday 2015 spot--but the only way that happens is if Disney doesn't put Star Wars there. Also add Mi5 and Warcraft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 (edited) Maybe October 30? Gravity/PA have shown we can have 50M OW's in October. We had a 48M OW in 2003 that adjusts to 63M. Also post MJII on November 25. Edited November 15, 2013 by Neo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Marvel Fanboy Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 Why the budget cut down ? Nothing went wrong. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmnerdjamie Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 (edited) It under-performed in the states and only increased overseas because of 3D. Many expected a big bump in attendance due to popularity of the first film. Edited November 15, 2013 by filmnerdjamie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 It under-performed in the states and only increased overseas because of 3D. he is being sarcastic. Referring to the revisionism and desperation to make STID's performance look good 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 Why the budget cut down ? Nothing went wrong. Did you read the article? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starkster Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 Why the budget cut down ? Nothing went wrong. Truth be told, the reduction in budget will be offset by the fact that producers are planning to shoot outside of L.A. and therefore receive better tax incentives; something it is said Abrams refused to do. It’s not as if their faith in the franchise has waive red. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 Why the budget cut down ? Nothing went wrong. Nope, not really. If you actually read the article instead of making comments like this, you would understand why they are reducing 20M in the budget. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
