Jump to content

ChD

Live By Night | Christmas Day limited release, wide release on 01/13/17 | Ben Affleck/Warner Bros. New trailer on page 8

Recommended Posts

Okay, a bit of disinformation going on in here. Dennis Lehane thought Ben was too old for the role (and Affleck said in an interview that he obviously had to change Joe's age in the movie, and it seems there's some CG de-aging for the beginning of the story), but Affleck screentested for him, and Lehane gave him his blessing, that's it, that's the story. Otherwise, he also said he liked acting in his own movies because these are more interesting roles than he usually gets. 

 

Let's see the film and judge accordingly. It's very well possible Affleck got too much on his plate here (with the material being much more dense than The Prince Of Thieves)  and he has admitted that pulling triple duty means he has less bandwidth (as he described it). It's also possible that WB thought the film was too long and he had to cut it down drastically. Scott Eastwood who's playing Joe's brother has been cut out of the picture, so did Titus Welliver (Gone Baby Gone, The Town, Bosch) and Ben LOVES that guy, that along with seemingly rushed portions according to reviews, it's a logical thing to think. 

 

I'd say his performance in The Town surpasses his turn in Gone Girl imo, he has rarely been better. 

Edited by TimmyRiggins
Link to comment
Share on other sites



http://www.metro.us/entertainment/ben-affleck-s-live-by-night-fails-to-bring-back-the-gangster-movie/zsJplt---2wynPn9EpKYkc/

 

Quote

The 1930s gangster movie, the best of them made by "Live by Night"'s studio Warner Bros., was lean and mean and rarely nice. Affleck's film is none of these. It’s plodding and murky, the inevitable by-product of trying to whittle a complicated and dense novel (by Dennis Lehaine) down to two hours. It plays like it was mercilessly amputated from an epic, yet it still feels long because there’s too much stuff and not enough forward momentum.

 

Quote

Holding it all together is Affleck in sleepy zombie mode, a state he’s always in in pictures also directed by Ben Affleck. Just as Kevin Costner the director sees Kevin Costner the actor as a boring fount of nobility, the director Affleck likes to cast himself as a brooding sadsack, always at some point staring poignantly at seas

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





I don't think WB cutting down the film is the problem.  The material is probably best suited for for a mini series. 15-20 extra minutes still isn't going to give enough room for all the characters and subplots to be done justice.  Adapting a dense novel like this for a movie is all about streamlining and focusing in on the larger arcs and characters.

 

http://theplaylist.net/gangster-squad-drama-live-night-major-misfire-director-ben-affleck-review-20161221/

 

Quote

Clocking in at just over two hours, “Live By Night” feels much longer, and its bloated pace drips like slow molasses. Flabby in shape, too, the drama finds a director with his eyes off the prize and a picture that cumulatively feels like it’s run away from him trickle by trickle. Even at its best, the sluggish “Live By Night” rarely even entertains.

 

Quote

Labelling “Live By Night” a disaster is a little uncharitable; the baggy drama is perhaps more painfully mediocre than full-blown folly, but it’s close. Mostly phoned-in and flat, “Live By Night” possesses none of the killer instinct that usually fuels the ruthless crime drama, narratively or otherwise. An uninspired examination of the outlaw life and honor among thieves, no matter how one tries to frame it, “Live By Night” is missing bite. And without teeth, all the picture can do is slosh around without focus, earning the unfortunate distinction of a directorial career worst for Affleck. [D+]

 

You have to love how Playlist's "painfully mediocre" warrants a D+.   But it fits on their usual grading curve.  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 minutes ago, LateReg said:

I thought that @EmpireCity also had said that WB was very happy with the film. His comment was what got me thinking this would probably be at least pretty good.

 

I definitely recall him saying it had bad reactions, or something along those lines. Maybe I'm going crazy. Nevertheless, I think it might go up to the mid-40s by the end of it judging by the tone of the reviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



4 minutes ago, AABATTERY said:

 

I definitely recall him saying it had bad reactions, or something along those lines. Maybe I'm going crazy. Nevertheless, I think it might go up to the mid-40s by the end of it judging by the tone of the reviews.

 

That was Passengers.  He said WB was pretty high on this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



"There was a comment in one of the reviews that he starts the movie as a 19 year old and "Affleck can't pass for a day under 35." I can't remember which review it was."

 

Oh Ben. Even DiCaprio knows he's reached the point where he can no longer get away with that.

Edited by filmlover
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



The most awkward "needs to pass as a late teen" star-casting ever might be Barry Levinson letting Robert Redford play the young Roy Hobbs in THE NATURAL. He was 20 years too old (minimum). Interesting to watch because he does a decent job with his mannerisms and stuff, but you can't hide the age. Interesting now they could probably de-age him and it'd be great. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites







5 minutes ago, Grand Moff Tele said:

The most awkward "needs to pass as a late teen" star-casting ever might be Barry Levinson letting Robert Redford play the young Roy Hobbs in THE NATURAL. He was 20 years too old (minimum). Interesting to watch because he does a decent job with his mannerisms and stuff, but you can't hide the age. Interesting now they could probably de-age him and it'd be great. 

 

He was still so beautiful it almost didn't matter.  Levinson worked around it a bit by shooting young Hobbs mostly in moonlight, shadows and golden sunsets.  Marlena Dietrich though would have demanded the addition of Vaseline on the camera lens and some gauze thrown over it. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites









Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.