CJohn Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Well, he was in Night at the Museum 3 And Chappie. And Movie 43. And Me and Earl and the Dying Girl... (wait what?!? He is in that as well?!). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grim22 Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Everything until they reach Tomorrowland is good. After that it derails completely. That was supposed to be Britt Robertson's breakout role. Norma Reedus apparently passed on a role in the movie http://www.businessinsider.com/norman-reedus-lost-his-role-in-tomorrowland-because-he-wouldnt-cut-his-hair-2015-10 Reedus found out that he would be passed over for a role in "Tomorrowland" playing George Clooney's father if he didn't cut his hair. He said: “I was like, ‘Don’t they know I’m on a TV show?’ Reedus suggested that they he could use a bald cap and a hairpiece for the role. He couldn't cut his hair, because he had to stay consistent to Daryl. “It went down to the last minute, and everyone knew I couldn’t cut my hair," Reedus, 46, recounted. "Then, I think the director, Brad Bird, threw a fit and was like, ‘If he’s not dedicated to this role and he can’t cut his hair, then it’s not going to work.’ I’m on a f-----’ TV show! I can’t just shave my head!” In the end, he may have been better off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 That was supposed to be Britt Robertson's breakout role. Norma Reedus apparently passed on a role in the movie http://www.businessinsider.com/norman-reedus-lost-his-role-in-tomorrowland-because-he-wouldnt-cut-his-hair-2015-10 I like Britt Robertson so I hope she gets another role in a big movie that doesn't bomb or is shit. Norman Reedus probably laughed when the thing was destroyed by critics and bombed at the box office. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halba Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 pan got panned! hahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 I thought Brit Robertson was 16yo, 18 tops when I saw Tomorrow Land. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 That was supposed to be Britt Robertson's breakout role. Norma Reedus apparently passed on a role in the movie http://www.businessinsider.com/norman-reedus-lost-his-role-in-tomorrowland-because-he-wouldnt-cut-his-hair-2015-10 Reedus is 46? Jesus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fancyarcher Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 (edited) I thought Brit Robertson was 16yo, 18 tops when I saw Tomorrow Land. Same thing, and she was supposed to be playing a high schooler in it too. Silly! Edited October 10, 2015 by FancyArcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fancyarcher Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 And Chappie. And Movie 43. And Me and Earl and the Dying Girl... (wait what?!? He is in that as well?!). Yeah, he had a pretty hilarious cameo voicing a picture of himself as Wolverine on the wall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJG Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 I like Britt Robertson so I hope she gets another role in a big movie that doesn't bomb or is shit. Me too. A year or two ago I was ill for a couple of days so I watched her in a old show she was in called Life Unexpected. I thought she was gonna be the next big thing. I thought Brit Robertson was 16yo, 18 tops when I saw Tomorrow Land. The girls 25 years old. She's literally been playing 16 for 9 years. If you see her play a teenager from something a couple years ago and then go see her play a teen in something recent, it becomes really jarring. Tommorowland was the movie where her age became more obvious for me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avatree Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Are you guys disconnected from reality? Britt Robertson looks her age... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TServo2049 Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 I had never heard of Britt Robertson before, so I bought that she was a teenager. Knowing it now, I feel like I should have realized she was 25, but I seriously didn't. Hollywood Teenagers fooled me again. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonwo Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 I like Joe Wright but it seem WB had too much faith giving him a huge budget when the previous biggest budget he has had as a director was $60m for The Soloist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avatree Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 I like Joe Wright but it seem WB had too much faith giving him a huge budget when the previous biggest budget he has had as a director was $60m for The Soloist. And who says the failure of the movie is Wright's fault? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 And who says the failure of the movie is Wright's fault? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avatree Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 The last Peter Pan live-action movie was a massive bomb too, in fact the two movies may end up making very similar amounts of money. I don't think spending $150M on a Peter Pan movie was a smart idea regardless of how the actual film turned out to be (which in this case is pretty good anyway) Last time I checked, when a movie is a huge hit we don't say it's only because of the director. So why should we do the same for a huge bomb. Audiences are not interested in Peter Pan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJG Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 The last Peter Pan live-action movie was a massive bomb too, in fact the two movies may end up making very similar amounts of money. I don't think spending $150M on a Peter Pan movie was a smart idea regardless of how the actual film turned out to be (which in this case is pretty good anyway) Last time I checked, when a movie is a huge hit we don't say it's only because of the director. So why should we do the same for a huge bomb. Audiences are not interested in Peter Pan. Michael Jackson really did murder the Peter Pan brand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkelf Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 And Me and Earl and the Dying Girl... (wait what?!? He is in that as well?!). He did voice from a Wolverine poster. Yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJohn Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 He did voice from a Wolverine poster. Yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAJK Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Saw it tonight with 4 other friends and we agreed that it wasn't awful. They actually somewhat enjoyed it, giving it between a 6 and 7 out of 10. I was a bit lower and went with maybe a 5. Out of 2015's mega bombs, it's not the best or worst. Tomorrowland Pan Jupiter Ascending Fant4stic 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dashrendar44 Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 I know someone who worked on this movie's VFX at MPC (He worked on the shots featuring CG boat models). That must be deflating to know that all your hard work get flushed in the toilet and the movie you worked on get panned all around. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
