Jump to content

Plain Old Tele

THE MARTIAN | Oct 2, 2015 | Will compete as a comedy at the Golden Globes

Recommended Posts



I don't see how it could be science fiction under any definition I've come across, unless your definition of sci-fi is "it's in space"

 

It's an alternate near-future universe. Admittedly, this isn't obvious unless you follow NASA's shuttle missions reasonably closely. The mission that Clooney/Bullock are on is STS-157 (I think, it's definitely in the 150s). The actual shuttle program was in the 130s when it was shut down. Therefore this mission takes place in an alternate near-future (that's very similar to ours except that the NASA shuttle program wasn't shut down). We know it's also in the future because the Chinese space station is shown as essentially complete and fully operational.... right now the Chinese have just started building it and it's not scheduled to be complete until the mid-2020s.

 

edit: there are also some creative decisions made that could theoretically be explained by this alternate universe: in ours, the Hubble and the various stations are in dramatically different orbits that wouldn't be reachable in the way shown. (That's really nerdy nit-picking, though.)

Edited by Telemachos
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



It's an alternate near-future universe. Admittedly, this isn't obvious unless you follow NASA's shuttle missions reasonably closely. The mission that Clooney/Bullock are on is STS-157 (I think, it's definitely in the 150s). The actual shuttle program was in the 130s when it was shut down. Therefore this mission takes place in an alternate near-future (that's very similar to ours except that the NASA shuttle program wasn't shut down). We know it's also in the future because the Chinese space station is shown as essentially complete and fully operational.... right now the Chinese have just started building it and it's not scheduled to be complete until the mid-2020s.

I didn't know that the Chinese don't have a space station, but still, by that reasoning, almost every movie ever would be sci-fi - that's just basic fiction. There are things in every film that aren't entirely true. That's the nature of storytelling and fiction.

 

What is more important is the fact that the way the world (or universe) is portrayed in Gravity is identical to ours. However you define sci-fi, I don't see any reason to believe that Gravity is set in a fundamentally different world than ours. If it occurred on land and was about some truck in a desert rather than a ship in space, no one would be calling it science fiction. It's just a disaster thriller set in space.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 It's just a disaster thriller set in space.

 

Genre definitions are only for categorization. It's definitely a disaster thriller set in space too. But GRAVITY pretty clearly (though subtly) chooses to posit a "what if?" that's based in the future, and it uses those future elements as key resolutions in the story. (Bullock needs the Chinese space station in order to rescue herself, it's not just window dressing). In the same way, if a movie was set in 2009 but the Twin Towers were still standing, it'd be an alternate past, especially if those buildings featured prominently in the movie's resolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites











Exodus was meh. I actually liked Prometheus but that's because I watched it a year after it's release so had no expectations or pre conceived notions.

This sounds interesting, but could go either ways.

I'm in a similar position with Prometheus, I saw it only recently (relative gave it to me on blu-ray for xmas) and thought it was pretty good, if flawed. I thought Exodus was good but suffered from Scott's vision being compromised by Fox (or vice versa, you can spin it both ways).

Link to comment
Share on other sites













So then space cowboys and Apollo 13 are sci-fi then

 

Apollo 13 is based on a true story, so it is historical fiction.

 

Space Cowboys is Sci-Fi since at its core it is about weaponized space satellites, which is something that has been theorized but never done in practice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.