Dementeleus Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 That s what scarjo s skin usually does to male reptilian brains.Not in the way you think... :lol:FYI, though, there's tons of nekkid ScarJo in it. (On the downside, usually unsettling things are also happening at the same time). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wileECoyote Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Ok where's my CATWS number? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a2k Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 What else is new? nothing much... Jack @iJackSparrow · @misterpatches Expect a cult following to form around this film in the upcoming years. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mulder Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Am I alone in thinking that Scarlett Johannson looked her best in IM2 and Avengers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 The main attraction is that scarjo goes full frontal in skin. Couldn t care less about the film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichWS Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 The main attraction is that scarjo goes full frontal in skin. Couldn t care less about the film. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfirebird2008 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Am I alone in thinking that Scarlett Johannson looked her best in IM2 and Avengers? Her ass was pretty great in TA1. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Was it good? You said Locke was the best movie of the year. Or is it you can't get Scarlett Johannson out of your head.LOCKE is still the best movie I've seen this year, but UNDER THE SKIN is just behind it. I think. Man, it's a weird, unsettling movie. But really good. Like UPSTREAM COLOR but more disturbing. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Everyone's asses were pretty great in TA1. FTFY. All thanks to Joss. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichWS Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 LOCKE is still the best movie I've seen this year, but UNDER THE SKIN is just behind it. I think. Man, it's a weird, unsettling movie. But really good. Like UPSTREAM COLOR but more disturbing. Fuck, I've been lazy. I need to see it soon. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecstasy Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 LOCKE is still the best movie I've seen this year, but UNDER THE SKIN is just behind it. I think. Man, it's a weird, unsettling movie. But really good. Like UPSTREAM COLOR but more disturbing. I don't like disturbing movies. I can't watch them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfirebird2008 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 FTFY. All thanks to Joss. Fair enough. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Fuck, I've been lazy. I need to see it soon.It'll get to you. I just described some scenes to Mrs Tele and she said, "Now I'm really glad I didn't see it." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalismanRing Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Completely different overseas market. And I do mean completely different. Hell, it's very different from even two years ago, never mind 9 years ago. Of course but Spider-men films were doing $400-550m plus O/S in 2002, 2004 and 2007. Batman '89 did $160.2m in 1989! & Batman Begins did $167.4m in 2005 Batman had to work it's way back up to O/S popularity Spider-Man: $418,002,176 in 2002 Spider-Man 2: $410,180,516 in 2004 The Dark Knight $469,700,000 in 2008 Spider-man 3 made: $554,341,323 in 2007 DKR: $636,300,000 in 2012 ASM: $490m in 2012 Internationally, Spider-man was bigger than Batman until DKR 5 years later and the reboot has knocked Spiderman behind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichWS Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) It'll get to you. I just described some scenes to Mrs Tele and she said, "Now I'm really glad I didn't see it." Mmmmm. I'd love to see Locke as well, but money's tight. Edited May 3, 2014 by RichWS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 I don't like disturbing movies. I can't watch them.It's got graphic nudity and some profanity, but there's little overt violence in it. One of the most unsettling scenes has to do with what's NOT done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Mmmmm. I'd love to see Locke as well, but money's tight.Then stop seeing junk like TASM and see both! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfirebird2008 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Of course but Spider-men films were doing $400-550m plus O/S in 2002, 2004 and 2007. Batman '89 did $160.2m in 1989! & Batman Begins did $167.4m in 2005 Batman had to work it's way back up to O/S popularity Spider-Man: $418,002,176 in 2002 Spider-Man 2: $410,180,516 in 2004 The Dark Knight $469,700,000 in 2008 Spider-man 3 made: $554,341,323 in 2007 DKR: $636,300,000 in 2012 ASM: $490m in 2012 Internationally, Spider-man was bigger than Batman until DKR 5 years later and the reboot has knocked Spiderman behind. I am very aware of the box office history. You were comparing ASM2 to Batman Begins. Extremely flawed comparison. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalismanRing Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) Your comparing the box office of BB to TASM2? Seriously? I was comparing the popularity across years in films between Spiderman and Batman after a2k stated: To be honest how would a 5th CA/Superman/IM/Thor** in 12 years perform? Yes, nobody asked Sony to do it this way, but it's done. And no other superhero could have done any better in the same scenario. **you will see how I did not include Batman in my comparison. He will kick ass no matter what. Hail Batman. Edited May 3, 2014 by TalismanRing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichWS Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Then stop seeing junk like TASM and see both! Oh, I haven't nor plan on seeing TASM! NYC is just damn expensive to see flicks, as I'm sure LA is! There's also Only Lovers Left Alive to see. Decisions! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
