TalismanRing Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 1 hour ago, Nova said: Hmm this is interesting. For the longest time I thought it was the critic who submitted whether the movie was rotten or not but this to me proves it's actually RT that decides it According to the RT editor it's about half and half. Most of the blogger and/or strictly online sites add their review and score. RT adds most of the major sites and publications themselves 1 hour ago, movieboner said: How is that Variety review rotten when it has a 70 score on Metacritic? Because MC reads the review (or mostly just skims the first paragraph) and assigns a score when the reviewer doesn't have a score. This means for most of the major publications that they weigh heavily against others have scores given by MC (Variety, THR, The Wrap, NY Times, LA Times, New Yorker, Village Voice, TIME, Slate etc etc) 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AniNate Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 We're too far gone now. Just gotta hope everyone keeps cool heads in the event of a "mere" 130 mil opening 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Panda Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 7 minutes ago, TalismanRing said: According to the RT editor it's about half and half. Most of the blogger and/or strictly online sites add their review and score. RT adds most of the major sites and publications themselves Because MC reads the review (or mostly just skims the first paragraph) and assigns a score when the reviewer doesn't have a score. This means for most of the major publications that they weigh heavily against others have scores given by MC (Variety, THR, The Wrap, NY Times, LA Times, New Yorker, Village Voice, TIME, Slate etc etc) Ah makes sense, still weird how RT interprets it as rotten when Singer himself said he liked it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taruseth Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 1 hour ago, tribefan695 said: We're too far gone now. Just gotta hope everyone keeps cool heads in the event of a "mere" 130 mil opening Yeah. As long as it stay above Incredibles it should be okay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudalb Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 3 hours ago, JB33 said: Bingo! That's my seasonal breakdown too. 3 hours ago, JB33 said: Bingo! That's my seasonal breakdown too. Pretty clear that as far as film releasing goes, Spring and Summer have merged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Rock Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 RT consensus seems to be written without thinking too much. The movie have stellar reviews so far but their consensus tries to make it sound like its just about average. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjones1325 Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 Word of advice, before you see “Incredibles 2”, watch the first film, or at least the last five minutes, because right when the movie begins, the Parr family wastes absolutely no time getting to work. The time jump between this and the predecessor has to be the shortest time jump in cinema since “The Raid 2.” The film literally starts off mere seconds after the events of the first so as we were aging for the past 14 years, the Parrs stayed the same. Well, not really. Since it has been 14 years, the resources and advancement of technology used for animation has changed. And Pixar has once again knocked it out of the park in animation standards. FULL REVIEW: https://www.rendyreviews.com/movies//incredibles-2-review 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyGossamer Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 2 minutes ago, rjones1325 said: Word of advice, before you see “Incredibles 2”, watch the first film, or at least the last five minutes, because right when the movie begins, the Parr family wastes absolutely no time getting to work. The time jump between this and the predecessor has to be the shortest time jump in cinema since “The Raid 2.” The film literally starts off mere seconds after the events of the first so as we were aging for the past 14 years, the Parrs stayed the same. Well, not really. Since it has been 14 years, the resources and advancement of technology used for animation has changed. And Pixar has once again knocked it out of the park in animation standards. FULL REVIEW: https://www.rendyreviews.com/movies//incredibles-2-review $200M+ OW DOM confirmed. Get ready! Kidding aside, I'm sticking with my prediction of just over/under Guardians Vol. 2's OW DOM - $146.5M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 What a fucking awful consensus for such a well reviewed film. Utterly ridiculous. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanboy Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 3 minutes ago, Noctis said: What a fucking awful consensus for such a well reviewed film. Utterly ridiculous. I think the consensus is pretty good? It's basically saying it might not be as good as the beloved first film, but it's still incredible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMan7 Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 5 minutes ago, Fanboy said: I think the consensus is pretty good? It's basically saying it might not be as good as the beloved first film, but it's still incredible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanboy Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 Quote may not quite live up to the original, but comes close enough to earn its name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolioD1 Posted June 11, 2018 Share Posted June 11, 2018 i never get why so many of you talk about the RT consensus so damn much. some intern probably writes it in 30 seconds after skimming a few review blurbs. they're all pretty generic. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Panda Posted June 12, 2018 Share Posted June 12, 2018 We should stage a twitter protest to RT to change the consensus! Stick it to the man! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanboy Posted June 12, 2018 Share Posted June 12, 2018 I'm waiting for the day Metacritic bring in a critical consensus. They have a new "Metacritic must-see" certification that reminds of RT's Certified Fresh, so anything is possible I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poseidon Posted June 12, 2018 Share Posted June 12, 2018 I think it will easily beat Dory. Keep in mind, that on Sunday it should gain $10m on Dory, even if both had the same Fr/Sun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AniNate Posted June 12, 2018 Share Posted June 12, 2018 10 minutes ago, Fanboy said: I'm waiting for the day Metacritic bring in a critical consensus. They have a new "Metacritic must-see" certification that reminds of RT's Certified Fresh, so anything is possible I guess. Uh, why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Lehnsherr Posted June 12, 2018 Share Posted June 12, 2018 Ok now I'm starting to personally get hyped for this. I could watch it in two days if not for exams though. Will have to wait until next weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium George Posted June 12, 2018 Share Posted June 12, 2018 $862m dom. $1.55b WW. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MovieMan89 Posted June 12, 2018 Share Posted June 12, 2018 The only sure thing ever about this movie was that the RT consensus would utilize fails to live up to or lives up to its name. It was maybe the only certain thing period in our world today. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
