Jump to content

Neo

Shazam! | April 5, 2019 | 21st Most Profitable Film of 2019

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, MrGlass2 said:

That's two days; Saturday drop sounds harsh?

Hard to say, movie do not drop but raise on Saturday usually.

 

Iron man 2: 

friday: 43.74

sat: 45.776 (105% of friday)

sun: 31.106 (71% of friday)

 

Iron Man 3:

Friday: 53.259

Sat: 62.273 (116% of friday)

Sun: 43.012 (81% of friday)

 

 

Shazam:

Friday: 14.451

Saturday: 19.524 (135% of friday)

Sunday: 13.629 (94% of friday)

 

captain Marvel:

Friday: 41.015

Saturday: 52.872 (129% of friday)

Sunday: 38.845 (95% of Friday)

 

Do look more Captain Marvel than Iron Man 2-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



DC superfan Grace Randolph said that Shazam will have to make $600M+, "even if it's just $601M", to justify continuing Shazam as a movie franchise. She seems to be advocating for a streaming release for the sequel, just like what she suggested for Ant-Man sequel.

  • Sad 1
  • ...wtf 2
  • Disbelief 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Moderation 

 

Please read posts carefully. Understand the context of the post. Then re-read the post. Formulate your reply with your best spelling and grammar. Then read over your post. If everything is in order “Submit Reply”. 

 

Let’s avoid misunderstandings.  And please do not deliberately misunderstand a post. 

 

Regards

BOT Staff

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



7 hours ago, UserHN said:

DC superfan Grace Randolph said that Shazam will have to make $600M+, "even if it's just $601M", to justify continuing Shazam as a movie franchise. She seems to be advocating for a streaming release for the sequel, just like what she suggested for Ant-Man sequel.

Well that person is pretty wrong considering its already confirmed we are getting more from the Shazam universe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



7 hours ago, UserHN said:

DC superfan Grace Randolph said that Shazam will have to make $600M+, "even if it's just $601M", to justify continuing Shazam as a movie franchise. She seems to be advocating for a streaming release for the sequel, just like what she suggested for Ant-Man sequel.

Her video was really off 

 

She also spent time saying how general audiences don’t like the film, even while ar the same time having the 91% critic score, audience score and A CinemaScore on screen (?!).

 

A $100m movie doesn’t need to gross $600m to be a hit. 

 

  • Like 6
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



11 hours ago, UserHN said:

DC superfan Grace Randolph said that Shazam will have to make $600M+, "even if it's just $601M", to justify continuing Shazam as a movie franchise. She seems to be advocating for a streaming release for the sequel, just like what she suggested for Ant-Man sequel.

Well....she is just wrong.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



32 minutes ago, jf8350143 said:

If Shazam needs to make 600m to break even, half of the Marvel movie won't even make any profit. It's ridiculous.

600 million to break even? Only trolls would say that. With a heavy focus from DOM 300 will be break even.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites







2 hours ago, Steele131 said:

Are people panicking because of the Monday number? No? Good. 

Everything tanked . Dumbo down 83%! Horror films got killed too. Now just remember this when Shazam goes nuts tomorrow. Like 5.2 million

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites







4 hours ago, Captain Craig said:

Well....she is just wrong.

 

 

3 hours ago, cdsacken said:

600 million to break even? Only trolls would say that. With a heavy focus from DOM 300 will be break even.

etc....

 

No to defend Grace, but that not what she is saying, over 600m to justify green lighting a sequel, not to break even (and I imagine that assuming that sequels cost more), ridiculously wrong yes but not that level of ridicule and at least consistent with her Ant Man 2 should have been a cheap direct to tv affair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 minutes ago, Barnack said:

 

etc....

 

No to defend Grace, but that not what she is saying, over 600m to justify green lighting a sequel, not to break even (and I imagine that assuming that sequels cost more), ridiculously wrong yes but not that level of ridicule and at least consistent with her Ant Man 2 should have been a cheap direct to tv affair.

Even that's silly. 400 million for Shazam is probably about as profitable as Ant Man. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.