Mockingjay Raphael Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, grim22 said: It's not a Twilight by any means, the second one fell 30% domestic and 40% WW. Twilight actually increased with the second movie and then stayed flat. Won't be surprised if this one falls even more. The trilogy should make good profit for Universal, but it doesn't feel like the audience is particularly loyal considering the second movie comedown. Well, let's be honest, we all expected the second one to drop a lot more than what it dropped, I'm pretty sure that the second one played to the fanbase only, and I see no reason why this one will come below $100m, it will probably stay flat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookie Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 9 minutes ago, Barnack said: First one played outside is fanbase because it turned into a event movie, but the fanbase that still went to watch the second one..... Will see. Can't really prove that unless this one performs similarly. Post-New Moon Twilight's DOM BO trajectory never changed beyond the margin of error. This has yet to do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 it's the last one. It doesn't matter how it does as long as it makes profit there are enough book fans/Valentine's Day couples to probably get it to 80m domestic/300m worldwide Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 6 minutes ago, cookie said: Can't really prove that unless this one performs similarly. Post-New Moon Twilight's DOM BO trajectory never changed beyond the margin of error. This has yet to do that. Yep, will see how much it was an hardcore books audience that was left on the second movie with the next one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valonqar Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 These movies are cheap and profitable but drop is inevitable. Unlike Twilight that kept the interest high throughout its run, interest in 50 Shades totally fizzled. I still don't know why the two franchises are compared except that 50 Shades was originally a Twific. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 5 minutes ago, Valonqar said: I still don't know why the two franchises are compared except that 50 Shades was originally a Twific. Probably tinted by the fact that it was a fanfiction were they removed the reference/changed the name for the publication I imagine. But also feel it is a lot of the same crowd, now a bit older. - Extremely popular book franchise - Never seen twilight and just the 50 shades, but apparently it is really similar story/ plot point wise. Demography audience Last twilight movie: 80% female (record low) 50% over 25, a lot between 21 and 25 included (60%) 60% of the audience aged between 21 and 25 (that was in 2012) First 50 shades 70% female 58% over 25 Would not be surprised if the shared audience to be really high ( a bit like between SH movies) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkshop36 Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 2 hours ago, Deja23 said: Oh yikes. That looks about as 'good' as the last one. And why is she still surprised about how rich he is? She married him and doesn't realize he can afford a private plane??! That shit was funny for all the wrong reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddddeeee Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 Is Basinger in this one? She was low key iconic in Darker. The big budget telenovela we didn't know we wanted. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mockingjay Raphael Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 25 minutes ago, ddddeeee said: Is Basinger in this one? She was low key iconic in Darker. The big budget telenovela we didn't know we wanted. This scene is absolutely iconic, I couldn't stop laughing at how awful this whole scene was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Mockingjay Raphael said: This scene is absolutely iconic, I couldn't stop laughing at how awful this whole scene was. This is actually really in the movie and not a parody they made for a show like Kimmel ? This is such a nice dance on the line between the spoof of soap opera and still being a real movie, really want to watch this now. Edited September 10, 2017 by Barnack 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DlAMONDZ Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 They should split this in 2 parts for maximum profit 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cochofles Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 41 minutes ago, ddddeeee said: Is Basinger in this one? She was low key iconic in Darker. The big budget telenovela we didn't know we wanted. OMG. Telenovela is absolutely right. Someone please rescue Ms. Basinger from this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 Just now, DlAMONDZ said: They should split this in 2 parts for maximum profit 2 would have been a bad idea for profit maximization imo, splitting the story in 3 parts like they did was probably the best maximization. And looking at the book wikipedia page, there is 4 th one (story told from the guy pov) possible spin of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alli Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 Dakota deserves better. and NO...i have not watched any of these movies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 7 minutes ago, Cochofles said: OMG. Telenovela is absolutely right. Someone please rescue Ms. Basinger from this. How can she be rescued if she already filmed it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zakiyyah6 Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Alli said: Dakota deserves better. and NO...i have not watched any of these movies She really does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 (edited) But in the other way (now that I have seen that scene) it look like she is doing one of the best meta/performance in a big production ever in those movies, and I would imagine ridiculous money. Could be extremely fun to do. Edited September 10, 2017 by Barnack 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cochofles Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 24 minutes ago, John Marston said: How can she be rescued if she already filmed it? From this phase in her career. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valonqar Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 2 hours ago, Barnack said: Probably tinted by the fact that it was a fanfiction were they removed the reference/changed the name for the publication I imagine. But also feel it is a lot of the same crowd, now a bit older. - Extremely popular book franchise - Never seen twilight and just the 50 shades, but apparently it is really similar story/ plot point wise. Demography audience Last twilight movie: 80% female (record low) 50% over 25, a lot between 21 and 25 included (60%) 60% of the audience aged between 21 and 25 (that was in 2012) First 50 shades 70% female 58% over 25 Would not be surprised if the shared audience to be really high ( a bit like between SH movies) Great breakdown! Just shows that supernatural + sex >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sex. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 (edited) edit Edited September 11, 2017 by John Marston Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
