Spider-Man: Into The Spider-verse | 12.14.2018 | Sony | Phil Lord and Chris Miller

[The Futurist]

6 minutes ago, shayhiri said:

 

A single RT critic dares to say the truth about this would-be-movie:

 

 

People are just gullible.

 

Looking different is enough for them, even if it is terrible.

[DAR]

The last two posts are enough to tell me this will be a great film

[Curtis1986]

Up to 85 on Mc and still 99 with 110 reviews. This is crazy.

Edited December 12, 2018 by Curtis1986

[The Futurist]

Just now, Curtis1986 said:

Up to 85 on; Mc and still 99 with 110 reviews. This is crazy.

Call me maybe

[Barnack]

1 minute ago, The Futurist said:

Call me maybe

 

You should at least wait to see movies for your trolling (how do you think your credibility look went you comments on a reaction of a movie you have not seen ?)

[The Futurist]

Reviews for this in France are as Goebels-ian as they are in english speaking countries.

[Mulder]

My forum enjoyment increased dramatically after I put Futurist and Shay on ignore.

[CoolioD1]

Just now, The Futurist said:

Reviews for this in France are as Goebels-ian as they are in english speaking countries.

still mad that people like a cartoon huh. being the guy who declares too many people enjoy a thing and that's bad makes you very interesting. this is what you wanna hear right?

[dudalb]

How much did this cost?

If the budget for this was really as modest as I have been reading,and the final antimation is so good, then a lot of the animatation studios will be asking question about why their films cost so danm much when Lord and Miller can get  the same quality at a lot  less cost.

[DeeCee]

@The Futurist has been threadbanned until 1 January 2020.

[YLF]

Just now, dudalb said:

How much did this cost?

If the budget for this was really as modest as I have been reading,and the final antimation is so good, then a lot of the animatation studios will be asking question about why their films cost so danm much when Lord and Miller can get  the same quality at a lot  less cost.

90M.

[dudalb]

7 minutes ago, The Futurist said:

Reviews for this in France are as Goebels-ian as they are in english speaking countries.

God, this shtick is old.

Edited December 12, 2018 by dudalb

[dudalb]

1 minute ago, YLF said:

90M.

Yup, if the animatation is a good as reported, a lot of the studios are going to wondere why their costs are so high.

[CoolioD1]

honestly he probs deserves a pre-emptive weekend thread ban. if it disappoints 100 posts trying to turn it into a dumbass "critics vs the people" culture war thing. if it succeeds 100 posts about americans being sheep or whatever.

[dudalb]

On ‎12‎/‎10‎/‎2018 at 8:08 AM, Krissykins said:

I think the marketing has been ok here in the U.K. I’m especially hearing that song from the soundtrack everywhere and it’s top 10 in the U.K. chart. 

I wonder if a lot of people in the UK are just staying home to watch the government crisis.

[DeeCee]

1 minute ago, CoolioD1 said:

honestly he probs deserves a pre-emptive weekend thread ban. if it disappoints 100 posts trying to turn it into a dumbass "critics vs the people" culture war thing. if it succeeds 100 posts about americans being sheep or whatever.

 

[Jonwo]

1 minute ago, dudalb said:

Yup, if the animatation is a good as reported, a lot of the studios are going to wonder why their costs are so high.

Disney and Pixar are based in California so the costs are going to be higher and they do not skimp on animation quality either. $90m is SPA's highest budget in a long time since they moved to Vancouver. 

 

 

[Barnack]

10 minutes ago, dudalb said:

How much did this cost?

If the budget for this was really as modest as I have been reading,and the final antimation is so good, then a lot of the animatation studios will be asking question about why their films cost so danm much when Lord and Miller can get  the same quality at a lot  less cost.

 

Depends for who imo the Disney/Pixar cost is mostly the giant 5+ year's process with sometime a major change that almost restart them 3 year's in, people travelling studying subject, inventing new technology, that really big time and giant resource are a reason for their really high batting average.

 

Pixar has around 1150 employee according to this:

https://www.owler.com/company/pixar

 

And make around 1 movie a year, that pretty much a 150m-175m in expense right there by movies before spending on the voice cast, musics/score and other not in house affair, the immobilisations, the computers/electricity and so on.

 

That massive spending create a nice clout for them and probably the way to go, their brand being associated so much with quality with that amount of resource put in every title is paying for them and they can monetize their success much more than the others.

 

Edited December 12, 2018 by Barnack

[TMP]

If this movie makes money could it be the Spider-Man [2002] of animated super hero films? Could we get competing animated cinematic universes between the companies on top of live action ones? I know there's meant to be a LEGO Batman 2, but idk if that really counts since it's technically a LEGO film too

[Mulder]

10 hours ago, TMP said:

If this movie makes money could it be the Spider-Man [2002] of animated super hero films? Could we get competing animated cinematic universes between the companies on top of live action ones? I know there's meant to be a LEGO Batman 2, but idk if that really counts since it's technically a LEGO film too

I doubt Spider-Verse will make enough money even with good legs to be on the level of Spider-Man 1. That movie ((And Blade+X-Men before it)) is on a crazy level only matched by TDK, Iron Man, and Avengers since in terms of the CBM scene. ((If we count prior then ofc Superman 78 and Batman 89))

Edited December 12, 2018 by Mulder