jb007 Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Watched it last Friday. The action set pieces are good but the action itself is ok owing to the shakey camera. Not as good as the first one, but still entertaining. Donnie Yen and Tony Jaa could have been used more. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arlborn Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 5 hours ago, jb007 said: Watched it last Friday. The action set pieces are good but the action itself is ok owing to the shakey camera. Not as good as the first one, but still entertaining. Donnie Yen and Tony Jaa could have been used more. So, Neymar. Under or over 30 seconds? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb007 Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 1 hour ago, Arlborn said: So, Neymar. Under or over 30 seconds? Over. Not by much. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatebox Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 The first one is rightly considered a modern-classic, so I hope this lives up to it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arlborn Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 (edited) 11 minutes ago, jb007 said: Over. Not by much. Tsk, they are selling him being in the movie a lot over here. I'm sure some will be fooled. Silly. Edited January 16, 2017 by Arlborn 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb007 Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 1 hour ago, Arlborn said: Tsk, they are selling him being in the movie a lot over here. I'm sure some will be fooled. Silly. He is there at the very beginning. There is a good line about him in the subtitle text which evokes laughter. Then you see him at the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalismanRing Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 2 hours ago, Hatebox said: The first one is rightly considered a modern-classic, so I hope this lives up to it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Panda Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 This movie looks like cancer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeCee Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 This movie is life. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin Feng Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 14 minutes ago, That One Guy said: Too many critics give 3/5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertman2 Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 I smell bribery Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eevin Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Watch the meltdowns as this gets a higher RT score than Split Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookie Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 2 hours ago, robertman2 said: I smell bribery Paramount has found a way to harness Disney's critic-buying powers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jandrew Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 XXX was on tv today. I watched it on Netflix a while ago and it was actually pretty enjoyable. Like Bourne if he drank nothing but Monster. Incredible it adjusts to $208 million, but then again that movie was the most 2002ey movie of 2002. Hopefully this one is solid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blankments Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Updated predicts: OW: 18M DOM: 49M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Craig Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 This is the second of my Jan guilty pleasure films that if I can get to it, I will. I managed to get to Underworld: BW so we shall see. Now that I know who Donnie Yen is I must say I'm even more curious about seeing this. Also, I'd like another Riddick film but that may be just me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
75Live Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 (edited) 12 hours ago, That One Guy said: and it's already down to 69% on RT Edited January 19, 2017 by 75live Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomCat Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Did Vin steal the Disney checks meant for Pirates and give them out for xXx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shayhiri Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 (edited) On 16.01.2017 г. at 4:35 PM, Hatebox said: The first one is rightly considered a modern-classic, so I hope this lives up to it. Really??? LOL! Old Shay's standards weren't nearly as high back in 2002 - and I still remember this as the dumbest ugliest action wannabe ever. It even has a 5 at IMDB, lol, how low is this? The new one at least looks good as visuals - and extremely stupid as everything else. The only ever reason to release this now - is to piggyback and cash in on the ridiculous fame of the FF franchise with the simpletons around the world. This is basically Fast&Furious 8 and 1/2. Edited January 19, 2017 by shayhiri Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
