Jump to content

CJohn

Uncharted | February 18, 2022 | Trailer on Page 28!

Recommended Posts







13 minutes ago, filmlover said:

March 2021 does seem dead at the moment and this sounds like the kind of project that would work better in that month than around the holidays so this is a good move.

interesting enough Uncharted will now open in the same month as the Tomb Raider sequel (but 2 weeks apart). 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites







54 minutes ago, Joel M said:

This whole project is just a terrible idea even by Sony standards

Fleishcer's "Zombieland" was a fun movie, but not one of the great zombie movies, let alone great Horror movies.

everything he has done has been pretty much hackwork..technically competent, but without much in the way of originaility.

So now thie film and the Tomb Raider sequel will duke it out for the title of #1 Indy Jones wannabe. 

Just not interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Holland has absolutely no career outside of MCU and thus is easily jumped over by Chalamet, etc, because he has a terrible taste in picking non-MCU projects. he's too focused on chasing the next franchise (Chaos Walking, Uncharted) instead of building his resume with different kind of work, to have something to fall back on after MCU. 

 

Zendaya does it right. She's very likely going to get Emmy nom for Euphoria.

Edited by Valonqar
Link to comment
Share on other sites











This project is probably the worst handled potential franchise I have ever seen, and has been for some time.

 

Uncharted *could* be the rare video game movie to break out.  Why?  Set pieces aside, the characters are far more charismatic than any other video game franchise, and the chemistry between Drake/Elena, Sully/Elena, and Sully/Drake especially is prime for big screens.

 

Sony has no idea, however, what to do with this film and never has.  The leaked Sony e-mails show this.  They don't understand that without a perfectly cast Drake/Sully, this won't work.  While negotiating with Wahlberg to play Drake back in the day, an exec even typed "Drake can be whatever age we want him to be" when another exec raised the point that Wahlberg was not a good fit for Drake.  But he can't.  Drake is an American James Bond, an alpha male but good natured and with a killer sense of humor.  And he's decidedly early 30s.  Sully needs to be 65 +/-.  

 

After Wahlberg, Pratt, and Hemsworth all passed, they actually at one point appeared to be taking an MCU approach of "let's cast the right guy" by reading lesser known stars that might be a better fit.  I know for a fact that Oscar Isaac, Travis Fimmel, Jamie Dornan, and Aaron Taylor Johnson were all read.  Some of those guys would also be...awkward...in the role, but no doubt all four are more obtainable (keeping budget down) and a better fit for the role than Wahlberg was.

 

And then we pivot, not older like Wahlberg, but young like Tom Holland.  I like Tom Holland.  He's a natural on screen.  But he is everything Drake isn't...youthful, cuddly, unsure of himself in an endearing way.  Not to even mention the age issue.  So you essentially put the film in an impossible place to succeed as not only fans will be turned off, but the GA won't be able to fall in love with the core character as he is fundamentally different.

 

Wahlberg as Sully, similarly, is a disaster.  If Drake's appeal lies in being a warm hearted but rough around the edges man in the peak of his manhood, Sully's appeal is as the older counterpart, a "dirty but suave grandpa" trope.  Once again, when you change his age, you destroy his appeal, and you end up with a bland "been there done that" character when you could have had an iconic one.

Elena also obviously very important, but no news on that yet.  Amy Pascal wanted Emma Stone back in the day, which would be a slam dunk but that was 2014 Emma coming off of being perpetual support for Gosling, not 2020 Cruella/La La Land Emma and so she's not obtainable for a supporting role anymore (nor could she play against Holland anyway).  But that was the one character they seemed to understand with regards to casting.

 

Not to mention, finally, that I've read the script that was pitched to Wahl/Pratt/Hems and it was dumpster fire level.  The opening scene was excellent, but from there it fizzled into a neutered Uncharted that was more akin to a National Treasure rip-off than an action film (they were literally breaking into Westminster Abbey and the Tower of London for pete's sake), and there was *zero* chemistry between Drake and Sully, with Wahlberg even going so far as to demand that Sully be written into a minor character so that it was more of a star vehicle for Drake, without understanding that Drake's character is extremely dependent on the repartee between himself and Elena/Chloe/Sully.  Without a straight man to play against, Drake is just a run of the mill action character and there's no reason to see him compared to any other action film.  Sure they'll rewrite the script for a younger Drake, but once again it showed that they had no idea how to make an Uncharted movie in the first place, and I doubt that changes.

 

The problem is that, once again, fans will be so turned off, but more importantly they are starting from scratch, essentially trying to write a new version of Drake/Elena/Sully for GA audiences to fall in love with, instead of just relying on the extremely lovable characters that should in theory be an easy pitch for non-fans.

 

What's agonizing watching all of this is that if handled correctly, and with an MCU strategy of leaning into the characters and understanding why they work in the source material, this could be a breakout film.  Not $1B obviously, but something that could grow overtime and be a loved franchise with relatable characters.  But Sony continually fumbles on the ball on this and shows that they don't even have an inkling of why the source material became popular in the first place.

Edited by murphydog
clarifying
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.