Fanboy Wars Thread: Personal Attacks not allowed | With Digital Fur Technology

[grey ghost]

Suggesting there's foul play is speculation but so is dismissing the possibility of foul play.

 

Both are speculation.

 

But we should at least be allowed to speculate. 99% of this forum is speculation.

[Dementeleus]

C’mon, there’s speculation and then there’s lunatic conspiracy theories. You’re better than this, GG. 

[YM!]

This is even more stupid than the whole Disney pays critics theories.

[MrGamer]

7 minutes ago, grey ghost said:

We joke about Disney paying off critics.

 

WB literally buys a huge share of RT and withholds their reviews till OD for one of their biggest, recent films.

 

And for whatever reason we're not allowed to discuss it in other threads.

 

People are pissed at Disney when they should be worried about Fandango and WB controlling who hears the voice of critics.

[grey ghost]

2 minutes ago, The Futurist said:

THey don't do it for Non Warner fims, are u sure ?

They did it with Bad Moms 2.

 

But that came out a couple weeks ago.

 

Why would that remove the possibility of foul play?

 

It's one movie. They could've used it to cover their tracks.

 

 

[MrGlass2]

7 minutes ago, grey ghost said:

We joke about Disney paying off critics.

 

WB literally buys a huge share of RT and withholds their reviews till OD for one of their biggest, recent films.

 

And for whatever reason we're not allowed to discuss it in other threads.

 

People are pissed at Disney when they should be worried about Fandango and WB controlling who hears the voice of critics.

Are you serious with this? This is bait, right? It is hard to tell on Internet.

 

[aabattery]

How can WB silence the critics if the moon isn't real?

[grey ghost]

3 minutes ago, Squadron Leader Tele said:

C’mon, there’s speculation and then there’s lunatic conspiracy theories. You’re better than this, GG. 

 

WB owns 30% of RT.

[75Live]

1 minute ago, aabattery said:

How can WB silence the critics if the moon isn't real?

 

It's the magic critic theory 

[MrGamer]

1 minute ago, aabattery said:

How can WB silence the critics if the moon isn't real?

But dude, dude, dude, what if WE aren't real, man?

[That One Girl]

2 minutes ago, aabattery said:

How can WB silence the critics if the moon isn't real?

 

The moon is real though; it's just flat like all the other 12 planets in the solar system.

Edited November 14, 2017 by That One Guy

[grey ghost]

2 minutes ago, MrGlass2 said:

Are you serious with this? This is bait, right? It is hard to tell on Internet.

 

Calling my post bait won't work here.

 

This is hollowed ground.

[aabattery]

Rotten Tomatoes was a false flag operation designed to discredit Metacritic.

[Fancyarcher]

Yes but that doesn't mean they intentionally "silenced" reviews. They owned 30% RT when SS & BVS got trashed. They couldn't do anything about that, and they can't do anything about reviews other then not screening the film. Come on, this conspiracy stuff is not needed right now. 

Edited November 14, 2017 by Fancyarcher

[MrGamer]

1 minute ago, aabattery said:

Rotten Tomatoes was a false flag operation designed to discredit Metacritic.

[grey ghost]

Do you guys know how much influence a shareholder who owns 30% of a company is?

 

Why bribe critics when you can take away their voice?

[That One Girl]

1 minute ago, grey ghost said:

Do you guys know how much influence a shareholder who owns 30% of a company is?

 

Why bribe critics when you can take away their voice?

 

cool stuff bro.

[jf8350143]

You know RT is not the only place you can check out movie reviews right?

 

 

[Fancyarcher]

Just now, aabattery said:

Rotten Tomatoes was a false flag operation designed to discredit Metacritic.

It was an underground ponzi scheme operation by WB, designed to take down rival studios, especially Paramount. 

[75Live]

This is the comedy I wish Thor gave me