ClaudeManhattan Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 When the ancillary markets starts in a few months, Soderbergh will be very happy with the South, Midwest and the NASCAR Nation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HenryMeyers20 Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 Soderbergh tried to pull a heist of his own. He put a commercial wide release label on LL. The problem is LL is really an artsy director cut movie, not a commercial movie with studio editing and treatment. 3000 theaters is too much for this movie, it would have been better served with two thousand or less theater. Targeting the rural areas is never a good move. Los Angeles, CA population is 7000 per sq/ml Charlotte, NC populations is 2500 per sq/ml Los Angeles average drive miles to your nearest theater is 4 miles Charolette average drive mIles to your nearest theater is 17 miles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 (edited) 25 minutes ago, HenryMeyers20 said: Soderbergh tried to pull a heist of his own. He put a commercial wide release label on LL. The problem is LL is really an artsy director cut movie, not a commercial movie with studio editing and treatment. 3000 theaters is too much for this movie, it would have been better served with two thousand or less theater. Targeting the rural areas is never a good move. Los Angeles, CA population is 7000 per sq/ml Charlotte, NC populations is 2500 per sq/ml Los Angeles average drive miles to your nearest theater is 4 miles Charolette average drive mIles to your nearest theater is 17 miles. You are literally the only one who gives a fuck about this movie's underperformance. Stop embarrassing yourself. This movie made more money by being in more theaters. Why reduce the TC? Edited September 2, 2017 by WrathOfHan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaudeManhattan Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 (edited) 6 hours ago, HenryMeyers20 said: Soderbergh tried to pull a heist of his own. He put a commercial wide release label on LL. The problem is LL is really an artsy director cut movie, not a commercial movie with studio editing and treatment. 3000 theaters is too much for this movie, it would have been better served with two thousand or less theater. Targeting the rural areas is never a good move. Los Angeles, CA population is 7000 per sq/ml Charlotte, NC populations is 2500 per sq/ml Los Angeles average drive miles to your nearest theater is 4 miles Charolette average drive mIles to your nearest theater is 17 miles. In the near future theaters will only be showing big blockbusters and oscar bait films. Everything else will go to Netflix and Amazon. Then the rural areas will be reached more easily. Edited September 3, 2017 by ClaudeManhattan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCKillswitch123 Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 (edited) 18 hours ago, WrathOfHan said: You are literally the only one who gives a fuck about this movie's underperformance. Stop embarrassing yourself. This movie made more money by being in more theaters. Why reduce the TC? Well, he was responsible for the "Logan Lucky will beat THB on OW" (or something like that) thread that got shut down very quickly (it wasn't a club, it was just a statement he made), then going about calling out mods and making scandals about how IMDB was a better place because there were no rules. He got threadbanned for double accounts as well. In another words, he's just trying to create excuses as to why the movie's BO didn't match his ridiculous expectations (really, why did anyone think LL was going to beat THB?). Edited September 3, 2017 by MCKillswitch123 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 49 minutes ago, MCKillswitch123 said: Well, he was responsible for the "Logan Lucky will beat THB on OW" (or something like that) thread that got shut down very quickly (it wasn't a club, it was just a statement he made), then going about calling out mods and making scandals about how IMDB was a better place because there were no rules. He got threadbanned for double accounts as well. In another words, he's just trying to create excuses as to why the movie's BO didn't match his ridiculous expectations (really, why did anyone think LL was going to beat THB?). Wasn't that Claude? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCKillswitch123 Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 Just now, WrathOfHan said: Wasn't that Claude? .....oh yeah, I misread. I thought Claude was responsible for the post you quoted My bad. (Though what's to say it's not another secondary account? It makes sense to me ) 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HenryMeyers20 Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 WHAT THE FUCK IS ALL THIS BULLSHIT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blankments Posted September 4, 2017 Share Posted September 4, 2017 I really liked this movie; it was super fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HenryMeyers20 Posted September 7, 2017 Share Posted September 7, 2017 On 9/2/2017 at 11:13 AM, WrathOfHan said: You are literally the only one who gives a fuck about this movie's underperformance. Stop embarrassing yourself. This movie made more money by being in more theaters. Why reduce the TC? Actually, It's not about LL's box office performance. The conversation is about questioning Soderbergh's skills or lack of skills as a distributor. That's something that needs to be addressed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted September 7, 2017 Share Posted September 7, 2017 6 minutes ago, HenryMeyers20 said: Actually, It's not about LL's box office performance. The conversation is about questioning Soderbergh's skills or lack of skills as a distributor. That's something that needs to be addressed. Not really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HenryMeyers20 Posted September 7, 2017 Share Posted September 7, 2017 (edited) 28 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said: Not really. You are looking for a fight, but I'm not going to bite. So let's just agree to disagree. Edited September 7, 2017 by HenryMeyers20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaudeManhattan Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 (edited) I think it's safe to say Steven Soderbergh's marketing plan is a total failure. He proved that big distribution companies are right and his beliefs about distribution is wrong. He couldn't sell a movie with a great cast and a 92% tomato rating. He brags about the movie already makes profit, but it's a lot less than he was expecting. LL only opened at $7.6m in 3000 theaters, A good distribution company could have easily opened LL at $15m-$20m and Soderbergh would be getting the same amount or even more money than he's getting now. Edited September 8, 2017 by ClaudeManhattan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 19 minutes ago, ClaudeManhattan said: I think it's safe to say Steven Soderbergh's marketing plan is a total failure. He proved that big distribution companies are right and his beliefs about distribution is wrong. He couldn't sell a movie with a great cast and a 92% tomato rating. He brags about the movie already makes profit, but it's a lot less than he was expecting. LL only opened at $7.6m in 3000 theaters, A good distribution company could have easily opened LL at $15m-$20m and Soderbergh would be getting the same amount or even more money than he's getting now. @Squadron Leader Tele @Stutterng baumer Denbrough @Water Bottle Is Henry one of Claude's alts? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaudeManhattan Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 55 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said: @Squadron Leader Tele @Stutterng baumer Denbrough @Water Bottle Is Henry one of Claude's alts? Don't even try to start this lie asshole, I been falsely accused before and I'm not in the mood. There is something seriously wrong with people on this board. Too many crybabies that get people banned because of a simple disagreement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 18 minutes ago, ClaudeManhattan said: Don't even try to start this lie asshole, I been falsely accused before and I'm not in the mood. There is something seriously wrong with people on this board. Too many crybabies that get people banned because of a simple disagreement. lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
75Live Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 21 hours ago, WrathOfHan said: @Squadron Leader Tele @Stutterng baumer Denbrough @Water Bottle Is Henry one of Claude's alts? Looks like you were right 20 hours ago, ClaudeManhattan said: Don't even try to start this lie asshole, I been falsely accused before and I'm not in the mood. There is something seriously wrong with people on this board. Too many crybabies that get people banned because of a simple disagreement. And you were wrong lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 Protip: if a known troll accuses you of lying, you're probably right. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
