Jump to content

MCKillswitch123

#UnpopularOpinions: Movies you think will overperform vs. movies you think will underperform given general expectations

Recommended Posts



Just now, Grand Moff said:

 

You're right, 750m is probably a more reasonable ceiling.

 

Holy shit nice quip, we got iron man and ironjimbo in the same thread. At least you acknowledged this is an unpopular opinion which is more than I expected from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha I don't think Avatar 2 will do that badly, I mean $900M worldwide? I dunno, hard to imagine. I can see it doing only $1.2B worldwide or so, but it seemed to do a nice foreign split so even imagining it "only" hits $400M stateside then it hits $800M international. Then again, I guess nothing is guaranteed. If audiences don't find it that compelling it could fall short of $400M I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, JonathanLB said:

Haha I don't think Avatar 2 will do that badly, I mean $900M worldwide? I dunno, hard to imagine. I can see it doing only $1.2B worldwide or so, but it seemed to do a nice foreign split so even imagining it "only" hits $400M stateside then it hits $800M international. Then again, I guess nothing is guaranteed. If audiences don't find it that compelling it could fall short of $400M I suppose.

 

No one remembers it anymore or even talks about it. The only people who do remember it I know are people like my 64 year old mother and her friends.

 

I see it doing 300m dom and 500m int.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, IronJimbo said:

Did the public talk about the mahatten project before the BOOM? $3b is the floor, $4.5 is possible.

 

Saying $3B is the floor for a 9-year gap between sequels for a film no one currently talks about is like saying that Billy Lynn will get a re-release and it will get 300M in that re-release.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, IronJimbo said:

Did the public talk about the mahatten project before the BOOM? $3b is the floor, $4.5 is possible.

 

The only way this is happening is if the American economy implodes and every film is making 100b minimum thanks to inflation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, That One Guy said:

 

Saying $3B is the floor for a 9-year gap between sequels for a film no one currently talks about is like saying that Billy Lynn will get a re-release and it will get 300M in that re-release.

 

Could not have said it better my friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, That One Guy said:

 

Saying $3B is the floor for a 9-year gap between sequels for a film no one currently talks about is like saying that Billy Lynn will get a re-release and it will get 300M in that re-release.


Why does the sequel part even matter? Cameron made the highest grossing film of all time, not once, but twice though? Without being an adaption or a sequel, new fresh Cameron originals can make $2.7b in 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, IronJimbo said:


Why does the sequel part even matter? Cameron made the highest grossing film of all time, not once, but twice though? Without being an adaption or a sequel, new fresh Cameron originals can make $2.7b in 2009.

 

Why would people see a sequel to something they no longer have interest in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, That One Guy said:

 

Why would people see a sequel to something they no longer have interest in?

 

Are you honestly suggesting that being a sequel to the highest grossing film of all time will have a negative effect on it's box office?


Either that or you're completely disregarding Jim's box office record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IronJimbo said:

 

Are you honestly suggesting that being a sequel to the highest grossing film of all time will have a negative effect on it's box office?


Either that or you're completely disregarding Jim's box office record.

 

You've completely disregarded Star Wars' box office record too :rofl:.  He got lucky and captured lightning in a bottle twice.  No one cares about Avatar anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Just now, That One Guy said:

 

You've completely disregarded Star Wars' box office record too :rofl:.  He got lucky and captured lightning in a bottle twice.  No one cares about Avatar anymore.

 

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?view2=worldwide&yr=1991&p=.htm

 

Hmmm, could it be that Cameron is THE BEST blockbuster director in existence? Can't be arsed to debate speilberg but that puts top 2 unless you're insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



3 minutes ago, IronJimbo said:

 

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?view2=worldwide&yr=1991&p=.htm

 

Hmmm, could it be that Cameron is THE BEST blockbuster director in existence? Can't be arsed to debate speilberg but that puts top 2 unless you're insane.

 

Star Wars has topped the yearly chart multiple times.  Your point is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites









7 minutes ago, IronJimbo said:

 

Stop diverting we ain't talking about Star Wars, we're talking about Avatar 2 and Cameron "striking lightning twice".

 

You claimed he has done multiple hits by pointing to T2's gross, and it topping the year.  So I pointed to Star Wars winning the year multiple times, yet for some reason, you seem to downplay its success a lot more than Cameron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 minutes ago, That One Guy said:

 

You claimed he has done multiple hits by pointing to T2's gross, and it topping the year.  So I pointed to Star Wars winning the year multiple times, yet for some reason, you seem to downplay its success a lot more than Cameron.

What I've said in other threads are completely unrelated to the points at hand, you've ignored every point I've said in here.

As for Star Wars, I've never downplayed episodes 1-6, you're putting words in my mouth. I don't particulaly know what you mean when you say I downplay star wars box office, I don't

 

I just say the TFA was terrible and predicted R1 to make under 450m dom which was reasonable at the time, my current prediction is about ~500m.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.