Grand Moff Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, IronJimbo said: lol! fat chance sws loonie You're right, 750m is probably a more reasonable ceiling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronJimbo Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Just now, Grand Moff said: You're right, 750m is probably a more reasonable ceiling. Holy shit nice quip, we got iron man and ironjimbo in the same thread. At least you acknowledged this is an unpopular opinion which is more than I expected from you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonathanLB Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Haha I don't think Avatar 2 will do that badly, I mean $900M worldwide? I dunno, hard to imagine. I can see it doing only $1.2B worldwide or so, but it seemed to do a nice foreign split so even imagining it "only" hits $400M stateside then it hits $800M international. Then again, I guess nothing is guaranteed. If audiences don't find it that compelling it could fall short of $400M I suppose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Moff Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, JonathanLB said: Haha I don't think Avatar 2 will do that badly, I mean $900M worldwide? I dunno, hard to imagine. I can see it doing only $1.2B worldwide or so, but it seemed to do a nice foreign split so even imagining it "only" hits $400M stateside then it hits $800M international. Then again, I guess nothing is guaranteed. If audiences don't find it that compelling it could fall short of $400M I suppose. No one remembers it anymore or even talks about it. The only people who do remember it I know are people like my 64 year old mother and her friends. I see it doing 300m dom and 500m int. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronJimbo Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Did the public talk about the mahatten project before the BOOM? $3b is the floor, $4.5 is possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronJimbo Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 UNDERRATED - Avatar 2, the floor is $3b ww, will be a great film, will have the best cgi and amazing visuals, will be the ultimate blockbuster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, IronJimbo said: Did the public talk about the mahatten project before the BOOM? $3b is the floor, $4.5 is possible. Saying $3B is the floor for a 9-year gap between sequels for a film no one currently talks about is like saying that Billy Lynn will get a re-release and it will get 300M in that re-release. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Moff Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, IronJimbo said: Did the public talk about the mahatten project before the BOOM? $3b is the floor, $4.5 is possible. The only way this is happening is if the American economy implodes and every film is making 100b minimum thanks to inflation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Moff Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, That One Guy said: Saying $3B is the floor for a 9-year gap between sequels for a film no one currently talks about is like saying that Billy Lynn will get a re-release and it will get 300M in that re-release. Could not have said it better my friend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronJimbo Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, That One Guy said: Saying $3B is the floor for a 9-year gap between sequels for a film no one currently talks about is like saying that Billy Lynn will get a re-release and it will get 300M in that re-release. Why does the sequel part even matter? Cameron made the highest grossing film of all time, not once, but twice though? Without being an adaption or a sequel, new fresh Cameron originals can make $2.7b in 2009. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 3 minutes ago, IronJimbo said: Why does the sequel part even matter? Cameron made the highest grossing film of all time, not once, but twice though? Without being an adaption or a sequel, new fresh Cameron originals can make $2.7b in 2009. Why would people see a sequel to something they no longer have interest in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronJimbo Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, That One Guy said: Why would people see a sequel to something they no longer have interest in? Are you honestly suggesting that being a sequel to the highest grossing film of all time will have a negative effect on it's box office? Either that or you're completely disregarding Jim's box office record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 1 minute ago, IronJimbo said: Are you honestly suggesting that being a sequel to the highest grossing film of all time will have a negative effect on it's box office? Either that or you're completely disregarding Jim's box office record. You've completely disregarded Star Wars' box office record too . He got lucky and captured lightning in a bottle twice. No one cares about Avatar anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronJimbo Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Just now, That One Guy said: You've completely disregarded Star Wars' box office record too . He got lucky and captured lightning in a bottle twice. No one cares about Avatar anymore. http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?view2=worldwide&yr=1991&p=.htm Hmmm, could it be that Cameron is THE BEST blockbuster director in existence? Can't be arsed to debate speilberg but that puts top 2 unless you're insane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 3 minutes ago, IronJimbo said: http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?view2=worldwide&yr=1991&p=.htm Hmmm, could it be that Cameron is THE BEST blockbuster director in existence? Can't be arsed to debate speilberg but that puts top 2 unless you're insane. Star Wars has topped the yearly chart multiple times. Your point is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketheavenger Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.2 will explode (if it's well received) and pass 400m DOM and 1b WW rather easily. Lego Batman will make around Lego Movie numbers DOM and maybe a bit more OS, but it won't be as huge as some are thinking. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronJimbo Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 2 minutes ago, That One Guy said: Star Wars has topped the yearly chart multiple times. Your point is? Stop diverting we ain't talking about Star Wars, we're talking about Avatar 2 and Cameron "striking lightning twice". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCKillswitch123 Posted December 20, 2016 Author Share Posted December 20, 2016 31 minutes ago, That One Guy said: Saying $3B is the floor for a 9-year gap between sequels for a film no one currently talks about is like saying that Billy Lynn will get a re-release and it will get 300M in that re-release. @Grand Moff Tele 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That One Girl Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 7 minutes ago, IronJimbo said: Stop diverting we ain't talking about Star Wars, we're talking about Avatar 2 and Cameron "striking lightning twice". You claimed he has done multiple hits by pointing to T2's gross, and it topping the year. So I pointed to Star Wars winning the year multiple times, yet for some reason, you seem to downplay its success a lot more than Cameron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronJimbo Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 2 minutes ago, That One Guy said: You claimed he has done multiple hits by pointing to T2's gross, and it topping the year. So I pointed to Star Wars winning the year multiple times, yet for some reason, you seem to downplay its success a lot more than Cameron. What I've said in other threads are completely unrelated to the points at hand, you've ignored every point I've said in here. As for Star Wars, I've never downplayed episodes 1-6, you're putting words in my mouth. I don't particulaly know what you mean when you say I downplay star wars box office, I don't I just say the TFA was terrible and predicted R1 to make under 450m dom which was reasonable at the time, my current prediction is about ~500m. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...