THE MUMMY | 329.0 M overseas ● 409.2 M worldwide

[HesAPooka]

1 hour ago, Barnack said:

Revenue

Mummy: 271 m

Edge: 340.6m

Fury Road: 388m

 

That is a good difference, specially if Mummy is really the most expensive of them all, but even using the 125 million figure if would not be better than the others 2 (even if FR was 230m like some rumors pointed at).

 

On 2017-06-13 at 1:30 PM, Barnack said:

 

 

Mummy

75*.53 + 245*.4+80*.25 = 157.75 million theatrical

Total revenue: 157.75 / 0.45 = 350 million

Your math for this is getting smaller by the day LOL

 

[HesAPooka]

You know what matter's to the studio? The actual numbers and profits. So deadline and jokers online can claim it cost 300m and will lose 1 billion but at the end of the day they know their real budget and real gross and real profits and no amount of math gymnastics on internet forums and threads will change that.

[Barnack]

4 minutes ago, HesAPooka said:

Your math for this is getting smaller by the day LOL

 

To be fair to myself a copy pasted someone else estimate  (message just above mine) without any validation if it was a pessimistic oversea total (he used 185 for Os-china versus my 245 million) that made it more China heavy.

[HesAPooka]

China: 90 x .25 = 22.5
domestic: 80 x .53 = 42.4

 

400m total minus domestic 80 and china 90 = 230 x .4 = 92m

 

total = 156.9

 

 

 

 

So according to studio documents the movie should do 397m more over the next 10 years..Lets assume mummy only does 50-75% of that then if you add its theatrical numbers (156M + 397 x.5 .75) and post theatrical numbers together you're looking at a total of 355-454m

So even with a budget of 200m and marketing of 150m the movie still wont lose money like everyone in the world seems to be trying to make it out to be. But in reality with a budget of 125m and marketing of 100m it's looking at a really nice profit.

/thread

[HesAPooka]

Quote

$369.9m worldwide cume

https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2017/07/02/box-office-pirates-5-tops-700m-transformers-5-sits-at-429m/#3159c75443e9

[John Marston]

the overseas run has been flat out good I would say. 

[Blaze Heatnix]

Once it gets released in Japan, it'll probably make over 400 million worldwide. Not bad at all.

 

Hopefully the next Dark Universe movie will be much better.

[Mr Impossible]

6 minutes ago, Blaze Heatnix said:

Hopefully the next Dark Universe movie will be much better.

 

I have faith in Bill Condon. 

Edited July 2, 2017 by Mr Impossible

[fmpro]

With Japan opening also 400 mill should be very possible..

 

Looks like it did 20 mill since last sunday

[a2k]

400 is not bad but it was also never in doubt. US and China combined were to bring 200 and the rest of OS 250-300 for 450-500 WW conservatively.

But I am happy it's doing 400+ and am rooting for Frankenstein and Invisible Man.

Edited July 2, 2017 by a2knet

[Blaze Heatnix]

54 minutes ago, Mr Impossible said:

 

I have faith in Bill Condon. 

 

 

Me too, but he directed the last 2 Twilight movies...

[John Rambo]

The Mummy has surprisingly done well in Latin America compared to Europe as a whole.

For instance JR:NGB grossed 1.6M in Netherlands whereas The Mummy which is well established brand might touch 1.8-2M gross. 

JR:NGB grossed 9.6M in UK and Mummy will barely scrape thru 10M mark here.

JR:NGB grossed 7.6M gross in France mummy might touch 9-10 depending on Spidey release.

Not sure why its run in Europe is not upto the mark? Is it summer effect? Heatwave?? 

In LA it has done well, Argentina one of Cruise's weakest territories has grossed 3.8M in 3 weekends staying in No 1 spot for all 3 weekends.

Brazil and Mexico crossed 11M mark, Colombia gross is solid as well.

 

[TalismanRing]

18 hours ago, Blaze Heatnix said:

 

 

Me too, but he directed the last 2 Twilight movies...

 

There's not much any director could do with that material when they have to stick very close to it or upset the huge fan base who attend the movies.

[Catty]

12 hours ago, John Rambo said:

The Mummy has surprisingly done well in Latin America compared to Europe as a whole.

For instance JR:NGB grossed 1.6M in Netherlands whereas The Mummy which is well established brand might touch 1.8-2M gross. 

JR:NGB grossed 9.6M in UK and Mummy will barely scrape thru 10M mark here.

JR:NGB grossed 7.6M gross in France mummy might touch 9-10 depending on Spidey release.

Not sure why its run in Europe is not upto the mark? Is it summer effect? Heatwave?? 

In LA it has done well, Argentina one of Cruise's weakest territories has grossed 3.8M in 3 weekends staying in No 1 spot for all 3 weekends.

Brazil and Mexico crossed 11M mark, Colombia gross is solid as well.

 

 

Latin America seems to love horror movies.

[John Rambo]

This ones gonna be TC's 12th movie to cross 300m WW (Shud have been 13th Oblivion missed it  14m) and 11th movie to cross 350m mark.

 

TC had domestic avg of 100m when MI4 released after that it fell below 100m now its at 97m thanks to The Mummy and JR2. 

 

 

Edited July 4, 2017 by John Rambo

[John Rambo]

This one should have grossed minimum of 500m if it had avg/decent WoM but sadly its wasted and missed oppurtunity for Universal and TC.

I seriously hope Universal learn from their biggest blunder ASAP this is not the way to start a monsterverse i've seen most of the people telling they dint like the movie at all some went to the extent of saying its the worst movie this year. 

[expensiveho]

400m for a second Mummy reboot is great.

 

Some people just had unrealistic expectations.

[John Rambo]

3 hours ago, expensiveho said:

400m for a second Mummy reboot is great.

 

Some people just had unrealistic expectations.

 

Some say it could have done more some say it has done less than expected, some say it has done more than it's actual capacity. Opinions differ from one person to another.

 

400m gross is a big thing but since this movie actually paves path for a monsterverse should have succeeded atleast content wise and this one failed badly overall in this particular aspect. This may be one reason why people had unrealistic expectations. This one will end up grossing not even half of first mummy and not as good as first 2 movies. So comparison is inevitable an you cannot escape from comparison by saying this movie is totally different than previous mummy movies etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[John Rambo]

Im puzzled on how the media is blaming Tom Cruise as the reason for failure, initially i felt this was pure hatred and they wanna bring down cruise.

 

But in some talk show Annabelle Wallis said that TC said no for a kissing scene which gives us hint that he might have had hands in production activities (Surely he does for his movies).

 

Infact i don't even have an opinion on this as im totally confused if Tom was to be blamed in the first place? Too much intervention perhaps?

 

 

[HesAPooka]

10 hours ago, John Rambo said:

But in some talk show Annabelle Wallis said that TC said no for a kissing scene which gives us hint that he might have had hands in production activities (Surely he does for his movies).

In Edge of Tomorrow there was no kiss in the script but Emily blunt added it saying she felt like it worked in the moment and they kept it. Very normal for actors to talk to directors to try to add or take something out based on how they feel their character would react in a situation. Doesn't mean the actor is taking over production. You wouldn't say Emily Blunt took over directing from Doug Liman because she added a kiss. That sort of thing happens all the time and is apart of the movie making process, it's a collaboration with everyone giving input.