lor15 Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 (edited) 10 hours ago, Valonqar said: I don't think it over-performed internationally. It had a stumbling block in LA, but sizzling success in SK and China was a good OW increase but MI6 cut its legs shorter. 400M OS has always been in cards so nothing above expected. I remember that we initially projected the movie to hit 700M WW, then there was Ant Man over JL but neither prediction materialized. According to BOM, it increased in Colombia, Bolivia, Uruguay, Chile, Brazil, Mexico (although by little margin in some of them), and there is no comp for Ecuador, Perú and Paraguay. It only had lower gross than the first in Argentina and Venezuela, but that is obvious. Edited September 17, 2018 by lor15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeeSoh Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 An Ant Man movie is gonna have a bigger OS gross than an X-men movie (Apocalypse), a Wolverine movie (Logan), about on par with Wonder Woman and little less than Justice League. An Ant Man movie! That to me is very respectable that a d-lister stands amongst the biggest names in comics. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zakiyyah6 Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 9 hours ago, Valonqar said: Oh, it's a great success and lets not forget over Solo on every front! It skews older because family man character, regular family problems (none of fancy royal household drama of Asgard and Wakanda), older cast in general and that's always going to attract less teens who gravitate toward younger characters or older characters with cool lifestyle (playboy billionaire vs deadbeat dad) who feel younger. It increased from the first more than much more anticipated Vol 2 increased from GOTG and that's saying something. They are going to need another Marvel character to increase the domestic grosses. It worked for Thor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valonqar Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 (edited) True. It's hard to judge the boxoffice of movies such as Ragnarok, SMH, CW on the main character pull when presence of other characters was clearly a factor. However, it's a good strategy, IMO, to add popular characters from other movies when the lead exhaust his/her audience. Always on a lookout for growth. Thor/Hulk pairing was smashing. Edited September 17, 2018 by Valonqar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebeccas Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 Isn't this like the first true solo Marvel film in ages too? Even the first Antman had a Falcon cameo lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legion Again Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 3 hours ago, Rebeccas said: Isn't this like the first true solo Marvel film in ages too? Even the first Antman had a Falcon cameo lol. Well, it has two title heroes, and the plot is fairly influenced by Civil War.... but yes, it has the fewest appearances by characters from other sub franchises since gotg2 and DS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 4 hours ago, Rebeccas said: Isn't this like the first true solo Marvel film in ages too? Even the first Antman had a Falcon cameo lol. The wasp was ultra present in the marketing and title no ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebeccas Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 Just now, Barnack said: The wasp was ultra present in the marketing and title no ? I mean no cross pollination of the franchises. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 Just now, Rebeccas said: I mean no cross pollination of the franchises. Since Guardian of the Galaxy 2 for one like that or I forgot a cameo ? Was Doctor Strange also the case before the post-credits ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EarlyDeadlinePredictions Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Total Lifetime Grosses Domestic: $216,173,285 34.8% + Foreign: $405,246,936 65.2% = Worldwide: $621,420,221 Looks like around 622WW final total. 7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valonqar Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 (edited) That's little over 100M WW increase, great success for the little guys especially considering World Cup messing up! Edited October 4, 2018 by Valonqar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted October 10, 2018 Author Share Posted October 10, 2018 (edited) 405.6 M overseas ● 622.0 M worldwide Edited February 8, 2019 by kayumanggi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFanaticGuy34 Posted October 29, 2018 Share Posted October 29, 2018 Whoa! Dat Ant-Man number. So that’s where the money went. Total Lifetime Grosses Domestic: $216,622,024 25.7% + Foreign: $627,411,070 74.3% = Worldwide: $844,033,094 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valonqar Posted October 29, 2018 Share Posted October 29, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrestrial Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 They already corrected it (if that was the base for the post) Only to be sure no newbe .... gets the wrong impression 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayumanggi Posted February 8, 2019 Author Share Posted February 8, 2019 406.0 M overseas ● 622.7 M worldwide Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...