Once Upon a Time in... Hollywood | July 26 2019 | Digital Foot Technology | RIP Cinerama Dome

[Eric Duncan]

 

[TMP]

13 minutes ago, Eric! said:

 

More scenes of Pitt driving around LA. That stuff really helped with the immersion imo

[VENOM]

I’d like to see more of that Pitt on a acid cigarette dog walk

Edited September 8, 2019 by VENOM

[VENOM]

 

And whoever designed this poster deserves a raise, it’s one of the best movie posters I’ve ever seen.

[Avatree]

4 hours ago, VENOM said:

 

And whoever designed this poster deserves a raise, it’s one of the best movie posters I’ve ever seen.

The woman in the centre, is that Margot Robbie?
I hate it when the same character is on a poster twice. Cardinal sin of movie posters.

[TalismanRing]

5 minutes ago, Avatree said:

The woman in the centre, is that Margot Robbie?
I hate it when the same character is on a poster twice. Cardinal sin of movie posters.

I think they're all on the poster twice.

 

I like the bottom half of the poster more than the floating head top but they're there to sell tickets - so understandable.

 

I miss hand drawn posters

[Avatree]

14 minutes ago, TalismanRing said:

I think they're all on the poster twice.

 

I like the bottom half of the poster more than the floating head top but they're there to sell tickets - so understandable.

 

I miss hand drawn posters

Oh right. Hard to tell from small image which ones are who.

 

Hand drawn posters are wonderful.

[VENOM]

31 minutes ago, Avatree said:

The woman in the centre, is that Margot Robbie?
I hate it when the same character is on a poster twice. Cardinal sin of movie posters.

This is the first and probably last time I’ll see anyone complain about seeing Margot Robbie twice in a poster 

[Avatree]

8 minutes ago, VENOM said:

This is the first and probably last time I’ll see anyone complain about seeing Margot Robbie twice in a poster 

are you suggesting that you find hand drawn images of women arousing?

[VENOM]

2 minutes ago, Avatree said:

are you suggesting that you find hand drawn images of women arousing?

I’m suggesting Margot Robbie is easy on the eyes hand drawn or not, you disagree?

[Avatree]

Just now, VENOM said:

I’m suggesting Margot Robbie is easy on the eyes hand drawn or not, you disagree?

watch Mary Queen of Scots

[VENOM]

19 minutes ago, Avatree said:

watch Mary Queen of Scots

I’m not watching that lol but I googled it, still doesn’t change my opinion 

Edited September 8, 2019 by VENOM

[Avatree]

Margot was such a strange casting choice for that movie, her entire character arc is about how ugly she is, and you just keep thinking 'youre one of the best looking people on the planet, shut up'

[VENOM]

22 minutes ago, Avatree said:

Margot was such a strange casting choice for that movie, her entire character arc is about how ugly she is, and you just keep thinking 'youre one of the best looking people on the planet, shut up'

So you agree she’s gorgeous? Ok I was a bit worried there..

[Amadeus]

If it wasn't for 2001: A Space Odyssey I think I would consider Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood to be the movie of all movies. Truly amazing. 

[Avatree]

I just watched it and what a pointless 160 minutes. Literally. Nothing of note happens for the entire runtime except the random ending. I heard this was a movie about Manson Murders, well if I hadn't been told that before, I wouldn't have been able to tell. What was Margot Robbie doing in the film? So much screentime and yet nothing happens except she says hi to Leo and then movie ends...?

 

Maybe movie makes more sense if you know more context of characters and story but I was just confused for the whole thing pretty much - didn't see the point of anything.

I don't mind films where nothing happens but this just did not hold my attention and i was super bored. Brad Pitt was quite good.

 

I was SO close to walking out near the start when there's some lines about how amazingly terrific Roman Polanski is.

 

Characters don't talk or behave like human beings, just like thoughts in Tarantinos head. Lots and lots of scenes and shots which were unnecessary and added no value. Scenes of watching TV, I don't want to fuckin watch TV when i go to the cinema!

 

Also all the foot fetish stuff I ve seen in memes online, thought it was all overexaggerated. Nope.

And some really awful shots where the camera just stares at someone's arse. No thanks

 

Movie needs a Not Cool react.

Edited September 22, 2019 by Avatree

[Barnack]

1 hour ago, Avatree said:

Maybe movie makes more sense if you know more context of characters and story

I would certainly imagine so yes.

[CoolioD1]

honestly it's surprised me it's taken this long for me to see a "what was the point of margot robbie's character?" reaction.

[Eric Duncan]

https://deadline.com/2019/09/once-upon-time-hollywood-china-release-quentin-tarantino-1202742406/

 

Quote

Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon A Time In Hollywood is slated to get a China release on October 25, we have confirmed.

 

China’s Bona Film Group was a co-investor in the title, which has taken more than $300M global for Sony after debuting at Cannes.

 

Tarantino’s Django Unchained secured China distribution in 2013 but the movie was pulled shortly after release due to “technical reasons”. It is widely understood that authorities took issue with the film’s content, including nudity and violence. A heavily re-edited version was subsequently released but to little box office success.

 

It is unclear at this stage how much, if any, of Once Upon A Time In Hollywood has been cut for the China release.

 

[TMP]

1 hour ago, Eric! said:

https://deadline.com/2019/09/once-upon-time-hollywood-china-release-quentin-tarantino-1202742406/

 

 

$500m worldwide, here we come