Onward | Dan Scanlon directing | March 6, 2020 | Coming to VOD on March 20. Coming to Disney+ April 3

[The Horror of Lucas Films]

Pixar needs to stop releasing two movies per year.

[john2000]

3 minutes ago, The Horror of Lucas Films said:

Pixar needs to stop releasing two movies per year.

why ?

[john2000]

11 minutes ago, lorddemaxus said:

I guess the Brave, Cars films, and The Good Dinosaur also had pretty good reviews.

idk what score the car film had , but good d and brave, yeah i dont see how 76-80 is lukewarm, thats great, 90+ is fantastic , 85 or so very very good 

 

 @lorddemaxus  man if you have bigger standards then you will be dissapointed very often

Edited February 21, 2020 by john2000

[The Horror of Lucas Films]

7 minutes ago, john2000 said:

why ?

 

Because one of them is always mediocre and always flops at B.O? I sure hope it won't happen to Onward, but both C3 and TGD did bad numbers. 

[john2000]

Just now, The Horror of Lucas Films said:

 

Because one of them is always mediocre and always flops at B.O? I sure hope it won't happen to Onward, but both C3 and TGD did bad numbers. 

how on earth 80 is mediocre, i dont believe that, 80 is 100% positive and it has 7,2 average ............

[john2000]

gosh i seriously  cant believe what i am reading here

[The Horror of Lucas Films]

4 minutes ago, john2000 said:

idk what score the car film had , but good d and brave, yeah i dont see how 76-80 is lukewarm, thats great, 90+ is fantastic , 85 or so very very good 

 

 @lorddemaxus  man if you have bigger standards then you will be dissapointed very often

@lorddemaxus Is never satisfied with anything, if it was at 90%, he would complain that it wasn't as higher as Coco.

 

A score above 85% is perfectly fine for any movie. 

[lorddemaxus]

Just now, The Horror of Lucas Films said:

@lorddemaxus Is never satisfied with anything, if it was at 90%, he would complain that it wasn't as higher as Coco.

 

A score above 85% is perfectly fine for any movie. 

No, I would be happy with 90%.  Also score is at 77%

[The Horror of Lucas Films]

1 minute ago, john2000 said:

how on earth 80 is mediocre, i dont believe that, 80 is 100% positive and it has 7,2 average ............

Problem is that it is only the start, I hope it will stay that high but I doubt. 

[john2000]

Just now, lorddemaxus said:

No, I would be happy with 90%.  Also score is at 77%

77-80 still, so i guess if it had hit 85 on rt, you would be like oh well thats fine i guess...........

[john2000]

Just now, The Horror of Lucas Films said:

Problem is that it is only the start, I hope it will stay that high but I doubt. 

still, lets see , how it will continue

[john2000]

if people have as expectation that every movie needs to hit 85+ on rt , being mcu,dc,pixar etc etc then ............ i am tired of this i remember saying the same thing when joker or captain marvel came , they had 70-78 on rt and people were like oh thats terrible

Edited February 21, 2020 by john2000

[Eric Atreides]

Moderation

 

@john2000 @lorddemaxus Please stop arguing with each other. It's gone on for multiple pages. Nobody wants to read your guys' banter for that long.

 

@The Horror of Lucas Films, you're also not off the hook. Pretty rude behavior on your part for acting as if lorddemaxus hates everything.

[The Horror of Lucas Films]

I guess that's what happens when you put two talentless 'actors' as the leads of your movie just because they're popular.

 

I hope Pixar will never do this again, they're better than this.

Edited February 21, 2020 by The Horror of Lucas Films

[john2000]

1 minute ago, The Horror of Lucas Films said:

I guess that's what happens when you put two talentless 'actors' as the leads of your movie just because they're popular.

 

I hope Pixar will never do this again, they're better than this.

i personally disagree , but to each their own

[PNF2187]

Quick Update on Scores:

79%, 7.33/10 on RT with 42 reviews (for recent animated films from Disney, that tomatometer is fairly middling, but the average score is actually identical to Ralph Breaks the Internet)

- Top Critics is 67%, 7.07/10

62 on MC with 24 reviews (that's only better than the Cars sequels - let's hope it doesn't end up in the yellow)

Nothing on Critics Choice

8.5/10 on IMDb (not that this really matters)

[john2000]

2 minutes ago, PNF2187 said:

Quick Update on Scores:

79%, 7.33/10 on RT with 42 reviews (for recent animated films from Disney, that tomatometer is fairly middling, but the average score is actually identical to Ralph Breaks the Internet)

- Top Critics is 67%, 7.07/10

62 on MC with 24 reviews (that's only better than the Cars sequels - let's hope it doesn't end up in the yellow)

Nothing on Critics Choice

8.5/10 on IMDb (not that this really matters)

imbd lol amazing how it has score 

Edited February 21, 2020 by john2000

[Menor the Destroyer]

1 hour ago, titanic2187 said:

the only pixar's film in the past 10 years that can recall its early days greatness was IO & Toy story3, 

 

The rest are just serviceable and enjoyable flick,   

Coco was better than both of those and imo TS4 was just as good as 3.

[ThomasNicole]

81% on RT with 47 reviews

 

7.38 average

 

I’m satisfied with the reception

[misafeco]

4 hours ago, ThomasNicole said:

Pixar will always face the fact that they’re not allowed to make only a good movie, you can see that even with reviews, people always expect their movies to be among the best.

 

From The reviews i read for Onward, it’s a movie that could easily get +90% if it wasn’t a Pixar movie.

 

Anyway, it’s getting good reviews, now let’s see the audience reception, seems like a very funny movie.

Actually it's the other way around. None of the newer Pixar sequels are that groundbreaking but they got a pass from critics because they're Pixar.

Dory 94%

I2 94%

TS4 97%