It: Chapter Two | September 6, 2019 | 11th Most Profitable Movie of 2019

[cheesypoofs]

On 8/27/2019 at 12:45 PM, The Horror of Lucas Films said:

 

Before the reactions came in, peole here were sure it wouldn't drop hard and now they're talking about IT2 missing $200m and going below $500m WW based on some reactions that are not even bad, this is beyond ridiculous.

There's people who think it'll miss 200m Dom? Lol I honestly think there's a better chance at a 150m ow than missing 200m lol not saying it'll do 150m ow, I currently have it at 125-135m for ow, but I just think sub-200m Dom Total sounds ludicrous

[JB33]

2 minutes ago, cheesypoofs said:

There's people who think it'll miss 200m Dom? Lol I honestly think there's a better chance at a 150m ow than missing 200m lol not saying it'll do 150m ow, I currently have it at 125-135m for ow, but I just think sub-200m Dom Total sounds ludicrous

It is ludicrous. People are just very sensitive after A) a disappointing year at the box office outside Disney's tentpoles + Sony's FFH and B ) getting burned by their own over-predictions.

[harlequinade]

Really spoilery TV spots started to appear. Well not to someone who didn't read the book but if you did there's some stuff in them you'll immediately recognize

[lorddemaxus]

 

 

[Neucentro]

1 minute ago, lorddemaxus said:

 

 

$133m is such a random number. For now, under $123m OW is more likely than not.

[Krissykins]

13th widest release of all time.

 

Widest horror release. It Chapter 1 is second. 

 

 

[eddyxx]

So ready for this to come out.  I've avoided all ads and promo so far except the first trailer and bit the bullet and watched the final trailer earlier. Shit looks crazy. I'm there on day one.

[harlequinade]

The soundtrack is out if anyone is interested

Edited August 30, 2019 by harlequinade

[WittyUsername]

36 minutes ago, harlequinade said:

The soundtrack is out if anyone is interested

Unless it consists entirely of Bill Skarsgård doing this, I’m not interested.

[Lucas]

Collapsed to 68/100 on Critics' Choice 👀

[lorddemaxus]

21 minutes ago, Lucas said:

Collapsed to 68/100 on Critics' Choice 👀

Doesn't really have any correlation with RT score or metacritic score so doesn't really matter if you ask me.

[Lucas]

16 minutes ago, lorddemaxus said:

Doesn't really have any correlation with RT score or metacritic score so doesn't really matter if you ask me.

As has been proven with pretty much every single movie, it absolutely does. It's just through a slightly different metric.

[lorddemaxus]

15 minutes ago, Lucas said:

As has been proven with pretty much every single movie, it absolutely does. It's just through a slightly different metric.

The Lion King at 77 and Aladdin at 75? Dark Phoenix at 62? Endgame higher than OUTAIH and Us? Hobbs and Shaw lower than Aquaman? If we look at horror movies, Crawl is only marginally higher than Pet Semetary on critics choice but the former was critically acclaimed and the latter isnt. La Llorona is rated much lower than The Nun on criticschoice although La Llorona and The Nun has pretty similar scores on RT and metacritic.

[The Horror of Lucas Films]

Strop trying to make Critics Choice happen, it will never happen.

[Krissykins]

Booked up for Superscreen next Friday! 

 

 

[Krissykins]

1 hour ago, lorddemaxus said:

The Lion King at 77 and Aladdin at 75? Dark Phoenix at 62? 

Lol at those 3 😂

[Lucas]

1 hour ago, lorddemaxus said:

The Lion King at 77 and Aladdin at 75? Dark Phoenix at 62? Endgame higher than OUTAIH and Us? Hobbs and Shaw lower than Aquaman? If we look at horror movies, Crawl is only marginally higher than Pet Semetary on critics choice but the former was critically acclaimed and the latter isnt. La Llorona is rated much lower than The Nun on criticschoice although La Llorona and The Nun has pretty similar scores on RT and metacritic.

All of those add up, yes. Have you looked at any of these any closer? Lion King and Aladdin at roughly the same - just like on RT, both with average rating and percentage, as well as metacritic. What's the problem there? Dark Phoenix being significantly lower than both, just like on every other site. Endgame's got a significantly higher average rating than OUATIH on RT, as well as a roughly 10% higher percentage. The only difference there is Metacritic's higher score for Hollywood, but that's not the same difference as a 7.8/10 avg rating for OUATIH, and an 8.3/10 for Endgame. What's the problem there with Critics' Choice? Endgame's also got a significantly higher average rating than Us on RT. Us only has Endgame beat by 3 numbers on MetaCritic. What's the problem there? Hobbs and Shaw's got Aquaman barely beat on both metrics on RT, it's not exactly a landslide victory we're talking 2% and a 0.06/10 average rating. Is it really that unlikely to you to imagine Aquaman got ONE number higher on Critics' Choice? ONE. 

 

What are you trying to say here? Yeah Crawl only has Pet Sematary beat by very little on Critics' Choice, but have you looked at MetaCritic recently? Crawl is at 60 and Sematary is at 57. Ooooh wow what a landslide victory. The Nun doesn't just beat La Llorona on Critics' Choice, it's got a 46 on MetaCritic compared to La Llorona's 41. The only thing you've succeeded at here is these things go up and down on most websites, but the trajectory is almost always identical.

Edited August 30, 2019 by Lucas

[Krissykins]

4 minutes ago, Lucas said:

All of those add up, yes. Have you looked at any of these any closer? Lion King and Aladdin at roughly the same - just like on RT, both with average rating and percentage, as well as metacritic. What's the problem there? Dark Phoenix being significantly lower than both, just like on every other site. Endgame's got a significantly higher average rating than OUATIH on RT, as well as a roughly 10% higher percentage. The only difference there is Metacritic's higher score for Hollywood, but that's not the same difference as a 7.8/10 avg rating for OUATIH, and an 8.3/10 for Endgame. What's the problem there with Critics' Choice? Endgame's also got a significantly higher average rating than Us on RT. Us only has Endgame beat by 3 numbers on MetaCritic. What's the problem there? Hobbs and Shaw's got Aquaman barely beat on both metrics on RT, it's not exactly a landslide victory we're talking 2% and a 0.06/10 average rating. Is it really that unlikely to you to imagine Aquaman got ONE number higher on Critics' Choice? ONE. 

 

What are you trying to say here? Yeah Crawl only has Pet Sematary beat by very little on Critics' Choice, but have you looked at MetaCritic recently? Crawl is at 60 and Sematary is at 57. Ooooh wow what a landslide victory. The Nun doesn't just beat La Llorona on Critics' Choice, it's got a 46 on MetaCritic compared to La Llorona's 41. The only thing you've succeeded at here is these things go up and down on most websites, but the trajectory is almost always identical.

Doesn’t metacritic only have like 30 reviews 

[Lucas]

4 minutes ago, Krissykins said:

Doesn’t metacritic only have like 30 reviews 

Up to 60, but 45-55 for most. Does that now make MetaCritic useless? It's also got a similar trajectory to RT, you've just gotta know how to use. It's generally much tougher to get a high MetaCritic score as opposed to an RT percentage, but it's also rare to get a very low MC score as opposed to an RT percentage. Critics' Choice is similar in that 0-40 basically doesn't even exist (which is really bizarre), so 70s isn't as high of a score as it seems on the surface next to MC and RT - but low 60s is pretty damn low. You've just got to know how it's weighted. Critics' Choice is really not that off from RT.

Edited August 30, 2019 by Lucas

[Valonqar]

This movie can't come soon enough and I hope it takes all screens from certain WTF expansion that tries to inflate its minuscule total. Fuck barely attended movies that think they are Endgame. 

Edited August 30, 2019 by Valonqar