WrathOfHan Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Audience scores: MLP: 91% BR: 90% MBU: 59% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMorphin Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 7 minutes ago, WrathOfHan said: Hmm, maybe I should have stuck with 40M after all. For the derby, it's usually better to go under than over. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alli Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Why the panic? calm down. this will do over 40M...i guarantee it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonwo Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 (edited) I wouldn’t be surprised if the runtime meant people are going today and tomorrow since they don’t have to worry about work the next day so it might have a bigger OD Edited October 6, 2017 by Jonwo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmnerdjamie Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 48 minutes ago, a2knet said: Just wanna throw it out there that as late as September few including me were thinking this one will be lucky to do 100m dom (in fact had it at 85 dom). Only off late have expectations raised to Mad Max numbers so we shouldn't be harsh on the film if it does less than 45 ow or something. Hoping the previews cross 4m at least. Because we still haven't learned to stop basing GA awareness/hype off fanboy-driven websites who studios always allow first screenings, knowing what easy lays (and loud mouths) they are. Then the film drops, the craziness dies down. Followed by them downplaying their own hyperbolic reactions with revisionist claims of "I never REALLY liked it!" 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozymandias Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 I know these aren't always indicative of legs but BR2049 has a 90% on Flixster and an 8.8/10 on imdb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XO21 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 11 minutes ago, filmnerdjamie said: Because we still haven't learned to stop basing GA awareness/hype off fanboy-driven websites who studios always allow first screenings, knowing what easy lays (and loud mouths) they are. Then the film drops, the craziness dies down. Followed by them downplaying their own hyperbolic reactions with revisionist claims of "I never REALLY liked it!" Amen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalismanRing Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 41 minutes ago, Cookson said: Why would WB be listed as the main studio then? You'd think SONYs name would be all over this. Alcon owns the rights and WB gets to distribute Domestically (I think because of a prior deal with them). WB did not finance it though. http://deadline.com/2017/10/ryan-gosling-blade-runner-2049-worldwide-box-office-opening-harrison-ford-1202181411/ Quote Warner Bros. is distributing the Alcon Entertainment co-financed sequel for a domestic distribution fee estimated at about 10%. Sony took foreign, and while they also co-financed Blade Runner 2049 with reportedly $90M of the production cost before rebates and tax credits, they do not co-own it. The domestic distributing studio is almost always listed as the main studio even if they don't finance it or another studio is co-financing it. See Marvel when they were distributed by Paramount. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCKillswitch123 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 (edited) Super early number. Probably not right. Wouldn't be shocked if it hits anywhere from 3.7 to 4. Also, I just wanna point out that THR's "review" of My Little Pony is the laziest bullshit ever - "it's just as bad or worse than Emoji", and it doesn't say how or why, it just says that without even attempting to elaborate. And I don't care about that movie, nevermind stan for it, but I noticed that and couldn't help but roll on the floor at some people's laughable self-righteousness. Edited October 6, 2017 by MCKillswitch123 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Theater update: Spoiler BR: 10:15: 18/124 11:15 3D: 4/78 12:30 3D: 5/78 1:30: 0/113 3:00: 0/60 4:30: 5/124 5:15 3D: 0/78 6:30 3D: 9/78 7:45 3D: 4/113 8:30: 3/67 9:15: 0/60 10:45: 0/124 MBU: 10:45: 24/113 1:45: 17/124 5:00: 6/113 8:00: 3/124 9:30: 0/69 MLP: 10:00: 7/78 12:15: 6/60 2:45: 4/78 4:00: 0/78 6:40: 6/60 8:45: 0/78 10:00: 0/78 AM: 11:30: 4/78 2:15: 7/78 5:00: 2/78 7:45: 5/78 10:30: 0/78 Kingsman: 11:00: 6/78 1:15: 2/78 4:40: 0/78 7:00: 0/78 10:20: 0/78 Ninjago: 10:45: 5/78 2:10: 0/78 4:30: 5/78 7:50: 0/78 10:10: 0/78 Flatliners: 10:05: 2/67 12:45: 0/67 3:20: 0/67 7:15: 2/63 9:55: 0/63 MBU: 50/543 (Up 21) BR: 48/1,097 (Up 10) MLP: 23/510 (Up 8) AM: 18/390 (Up 6) Ninjago: 10/390 (Up 5) Kingsman: 8/390 (Up 2) Flatliners: 4/327 (Up 2) It, Sexes, and Princess and the Frog have sold nothing. Letting It keep two screens is looking to be a PERFECT decision Comparisons for BR: 20% of It (it's on par with It's second Friday, though) 45% of Kingsman 70% of AA 80% of THB MLP has sold 80% of Ninjago. Again, I don't have good comparisons for MBU, but it's waaay ahead of Home Again and 75% of AA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damianport1 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Titanic was like 200 minutes long...Revenant 160....and both did so well. i dont think running time will be a reason this underwhelmed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cochofles Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Damianport1 said: Titanic was like 200 minutes long...Revenant 160....and both did so well. i dont think running time will be a reason this underwhelmed And let's not forget a little indie about blue indigenous cat-people in outer space battling a big bad corporation. I hear it did quite well for a 2-hour-42-minute film... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WrathOfHan Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 The first BR at Disney Springs has only sold 30 tickets, and the next one has sold VERY little. The Dolby Cinema at Altamonte is looking pretty solid today, but the IMAX at the same theater is looking pretty meh until the evening. Pointe Orlando's IMAX and 4DX are looking pretty light too. Dunno. These sales aren't really encouraging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozymandias Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Blade Runner wasn't turned into an action movie or franchise for today's audiences. Bravo to Denis Whatshisname, Ridley Scott, and Hampton Fancher for not going that route to make it more accessible to $$$$ 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoMisfits Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 6 minutes ago, Ozymandias said: Blade Runner wasn't turned into an action movie or franchise for today's audiences. Bravo to Denis Whatshisname, Ridley Scott, and Hampton Fancher for not going that route to make it more accessible to $$$$ But if you're gonna do that...and not really open up the movie to non-fans...you better either appropriately guesstimate your total fan base and/or appropriately size your budget. It does no good to make a $150M masterpiece if it causes a $50M-$100M loss for your studios... (Now, I'm not saying this movie will ultimately be a money loser, so don't jump on me yet when we only have a kinda Thursday number - I'm speaking in general:)... 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XO21 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 39 minutes ago, Damianport1 said: Titanic was like 200 minutes long...Revenant 160....and both did so well. i dont think running time will be a reason this underwhelmed Threatened Nolan fanboy spotted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmnerdjamie Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 Running length is and isn't an issue. Comes down to the film itself ultimately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPink Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, XO21 said: Threatened Nolan fanboy spotted Spoiler 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonwo Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 27 minutes ago, TwoMisfits said: But if you're gonna do that...and not really open up the movie to non-fans...you better either appropriately guesstimate your total fan base and/or appropriately size your budget. It does no good to make a $150M masterpiece if it causes a $50M-$100M loss for your studios... (Now, I'm not saying this movie will ultimately be a money loser, so don't jump on me yet when we only have a kinda Thursday number - I'm speaking in general:)... Maybe they should had a deal on Atom TBH I imagine from WB and Sony’s POV, Blade Runner 2049 wasn’t likely to be a big moneyspinner but they’ll reap the rewards later on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 8 hours ago, the beast said: This is adult skewed and I think is gonna be very backloaded like 15x-18x the previews Movies in general tend to be now and some of those used are R-rated/very old franchise like Blade Runner. Cinemascore/posttrack demo for the first weekend Apes: 64% over 25 Kingsman: 74% over 25 (the first one was just at 60% to show the strong tendancy) MadMax: 54% over the age of 35 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
