Jump to content

Water Bottle

Classic Conversation Thread

Recommended Posts

On 12/16/2019 at 2:27 PM, DAJK said:

I don’t like the idea of foreign companies having a monopoly on the Canadian market (a Belgium company Kineopolis owns Landmark too) but hopefully it doesn’t make the audience viewing experience worse

 

True. They need to change their popcorn recipe.

Are there local chains in other Provinces? We have Cinemas Guzzo here in the Montreal/Quebec area. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



3 hours ago, EarlyDeadlinePredictions said:

Are there local chains in other Provinces? We have Cinemas Guzzo here in the Montreal/Quebec area. 

Not sure, I'm pretty sure other than independents it's just Cineplex/Landmark. Although I'm not surprised Quebec has its own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2019 at 2:27 PM, DAJK said:

I don’t like the idea of foreign companies having a monopoly on the Canadian market (a Belgium company Kineopolis owns Landmark too) but hopefully it doesn’t make the audience viewing experience worse

 

True. They need to change their popcorn recipe.

 

 

Time to build the great ice wall around Canada 

Link to comment
Share on other sites













9 hours ago, Morieris said:

 

While I'm not fond of Universal's animation output, I am glad that other studios want this property. It's been kind of redundant and samey under WB.

Universal is gonna do a worse job with it. I'm pretty sure none of the film's that Universal will make will be even half as good as The Lego Movie and it's sequel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



15 hours ago, AndyK said:

Today in the twitterverse, JK Rowling got cancelled for supporting a woman who was sacked for stating that there are two biological sexes.

 

 

That's not what she said. What a gross oversimplification of that whole thing. This is what an employment judge who reviewed her case said about her:

"I conclude from … the totality of the evidence, that [Forstater] is absolutist in her view of sex and it is a core component of her belief that she will refer to a person by the sex she considered appropriate even if it violates their dignity and/or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. The approach is not worthy of respect in a democratic society.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites



47 minutes ago, lorddemaxus said:

That's not what she said. What a gross oversimplification of that whole thing. This is what an employment judge who reviewed her case said about her:

"I conclude from … the totality of the evidence, that [Forstater] is absolutist in her view of sex and it is a core component of her belief that she will refer to a person by the sex she considered appropriate even if it violates their dignity and/or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. The approach is not worthy of respect in a democratic society.”

Orwell would be so proud.

If you were a Pravda reader, you learned that communism was winning & the beacon of the modern world

If you dared contradict this privately of publicly, it was trial at best but generally the Gulag then agonizing death.

We are the trials phase.

Edited by The Futurist
Link to comment
Share on other sites











Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.