Jump to content

baumer

Tuesday numbers RPO 5.4

Recommended Posts





3 hours ago, KeepItU25071906 said:

not bad, not bad

 

But we need the other results for comparison

 

Well, if you go by history, it's a good Tuesday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Given Monday’s inflated numbers due to the Easter holiday, that 3% gain for an opener seems fine. Of course if everything else comes in at >+50% then we can reassess.

Edited by LonePirate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, baumer said:

 

Well, if you go by history, it's a good Tuesday.

Yeh an increase is a good number.

 

Was expecting a 5% decrease due to it being a brand new opener on a holiday weekend with a holiday Monday. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



First Tuesdays for other films released on Easter weekend:

 

BvS:  -19% (ok, this is an extreme example)

Furious 7:  -5%

Transcendence:  +3%

GI Joe:  -11%

 

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KeepItU25071906 said:

I've gone by history, but anyway...

 

Well, if you had, then you'd see that it's a good number.  :)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 minutes ago, baumer said:

 

Well, if you go by history, it's a good Tuesday.

It is true that look it is not bad if you go by history:

 

Furious 7: -5

Fast 8: -4.4

BvS: -19%

GI Joe: -11.7%

Transcendence: +3.5%

 

But recent History do not have a good comparable, at least not with the quick look I gave (recent good legs for a non franchise movie with a big easter weekend, tuesday bump have got bigger in recent time making even GI Joe a bit of a different time comparable)


But all of those comparable above would not be good legs for a well received non franchise entry.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



3 hours ago, Barnack said:

It is true that look it is not bad if you go by history:

 

Furious 7: -5

Fast 8: -4.4

BvS: -19%

GI Joe: -11.7%

Transcendence: +3.5%

 

But recent History do not have a good comparable, at least not with the quick look I gave (recent good legs for a non franchise movie with a big easter weekend, tuesday bump have got bigger in recent time making even GI Joe a bit of a different time comparable)


But all of those comparable above would not be good legs for a well received non franchise entry.

 

What do you mean, recent history?  These are all examples based off of recent history.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





3 minutes ago, baumer said:

 

What do you mean, recent history?  These are all examples based off of recent history.

Yeah it was me looking at recent history bringing those comparable but when talking about tuesday bump, I am not sure that 2013/14 is really recent, didn't they got much bigger in the last 2-3 year's ? While many on that list are extremely frontloaded sequels.

Edited by Barnack
Link to comment
Share on other sites







3 hours ago, Barnack said:

Yeah it was me looking at recent history bringing those comparable but when talking about tuesday bump, I am not sure that 2013/14 is really recent, didn't they got much bigger in the last 2-3 year's ? While many on that list are extremely frontloaded sequels.

 

But I posted films from 2014-2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites









  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.