movies!movies! Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOGAN'sLuckyRun Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 (edited) Should have been called "An Extremely Quiet Place" This is why you're trailing behind, Paramount! Edited September 25, 2019 by LOGAN'sLuckyRun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Reynolds Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 I'm not surprised they're going with the "surprise" marketing approach to this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marveldcfox Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Have yet to watch the first one. Not a horror fan especially involving tragic deaths and all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grim22 Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Somewhat surprised this hasn't moved to March 13 to take advantage of Friday the 13th OD. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aladdino Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 this should gross half of what the overrated first part did 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDC1987 Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 16 hours ago, aladdino said: this should gross half of what the overrated first part did Projecting your own hatred here. The first opened huge but then still pulled down a multi over 3.5, so audiences loved it. A 50% drop would be shocking and a bit inexplicable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGAR4LIFE Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Weird how there’s no marketing for this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmlover Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, JGAR4LIFE said: Weird how there’s no marketing for this tbh a stealth marketing campaign is probably the plan. I'd expect a trailer to land no earlier than 1917's wide launch in early January. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Atreides Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 A recording of the teaser is on YouTube, btw. Dunno if I'm allowed to link to it, but it is indeed literally seconds long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Atreides Posted December 18, 2019 Author Share Posted December 18, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Atreides Posted December 18, 2019 Author Share Posted December 18, 2019 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aladdino Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 On 12/14/2019 at 1:14 PM, PDC1987 said: Projecting your own hatred here. The first opened huge but then still pulled down a multi over 3.5, so audiences loved it. A 50% drop would be shocking and a bit inexplicable. this looks like it'll be very similar to part one, novelty factor wore off... so maybe not 1/2 of the gross but 2/3 yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MOVIEGUY Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 Not that anyone asked, but I couldn't get into the first. It was a well-made movie and everything, but the premise is just so god damn absurd and they play it SO seriously. I can't even put dishes away quietly, you're gonna tell me that you can run a fucking farm silently with a bunch of kids and a baby running around? YOU CAN'T OPERATE A FARM SILENTLY. That is all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krissykins Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 I don’t think it needs a sequel. But it made too much money not to try. Glad the same family is back though. Is this Emily’s first sequel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OdinSon2k14 Posted December 20, 2019 Share Posted December 20, 2019 Got it made already? I still freshly remember the original opening to a shocking 50M first place, barely losing to Dwayne Johnson's Rampage the second weekend. THEN roaring back in week three, to CRUSH Rampage, just as Johnson was about to pat his own back again 😂. Wasnt that expensive make though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgrave Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 On 12/14/2019 at 7:14 AM, PDC1987 said: Projecting your own hatred here. The first opened huge but then still pulled down a multi over 3.5, so audiences loved it. A 50% drop would be shocking and a bit inexplicable. The good legs of the first movie had the "silent movie gimmick" curiosity to draw people into the theater I can hardly believe it can be duplicate a second time. I don't think it's going to open to 50M$ like the first one, and we can absolutely forget the sequel to have legs. So a drop of 50% will not be shocking at all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDC1987 Posted December 29, 2019 Share Posted December 29, 2019 On 12/23/2019 at 9:49 AM, sgrave said: The good legs of the first movie had the "silent movie gimmick" curiosity to draw people into the theater I can hardly believe it can be duplicate a second time. I don't think it's going to open to 50M$ like the first one, and we can absolutely forget the sequel to have legs. So a drop of 50% will not be shocking at all. Wrong. Gimmicks don't go beyond opening weekend. The legs occurred because people liked what they saw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
