Jump to content

ronisssantos

Eternals | Marvel Studios | Nov 5 2021 | Magnum-Opus by Oscar winner Chloe Zhao - Marvel's first rotten movie | Dips into the 40s on RT, B CinemaScore

Recommended Posts



7 minutes ago, cax16 said:

That show was so awful.

Agreed, easily Feige's biggest embarassment. He had the brains to pull the plug on it quickly, though.

The idea was to make the Inhumans a subsitute for Mutants in the MCU. That failed, but luckily for Marvel Studios shortly it got control of the X men.

Maybe the Inhumans will make a comeback in an FF film, but I don't think Feige is eager to revist the Inhumans right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dudalb said:

Agreed, easily Feige's biggest embarassment. He had the brains to pull the plug on it quickly, though.

The idea was to make the Inhumans a subsitute for Mutants in the MCU. That failed, but luckily for Marvel Studios shortly it got control of the X men.

Maybe the Inhumans will make a comeback in an FF film, but I don't think Feige is eager to revist the Inhumans right now.

not really bc feige wasnt involved in the show

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



IMDb user ratings have been proven to be trash for about 6 years now.

 

People don’t realise it until it impacts a film you’re interested in or like. 
 

If you click on the ratings, the reviews are as bad as the Daily Mail comment section.
 

“Woke” is a dangerous term, used by bigots. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



25 minutes ago, dudalb said:

Agreed, easily Feige's biggest embarassment. He had the brains to pull the plug on it quickly, though.

The idea was to make the Inhumans a subsitute for Mutants in the MCU. That failed, but luckily for Marvel Studios shortly it got control of the X men.

Maybe the Inhumans will make a comeback in an FF film, but I don't think Feige is eager to revist the Inhumans right now.

Feige wasn't involved in the show at all. None of them actually, except for Agent Carter.

Edited by SpiderByte
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites







I do think there's a "blood in the water" element here, in that a lot of reviewers across the country, outside of LA and New York, will see the film knowing that it isn't controversial to give it a negative grade. It's a potential side effect of the early review embargo and staggered press screenings. If reaction is positive, those smaller market reviews are less likely to make a ruckus. If reaction is mixed, well...

Edited by ViewerAnon
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Even the Marvel friendly critics are not liking it. This Marvel and Zhao collaboration just didn’t work.

 

It’s unfortunate but I think if it was one of the more established franchises getting bad reviews(Avengers, Thor, Spider-Man) more people would care.

 

With Eternals being something new and not a popular comic anyway, it just seems Marvel will be like ‘we took a risk and it didn’t pay off’.

 

Whether the Eternals franchise continues though, that’s down to the audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





some of the reviews are weird on rt , i mean some that are fresh maybe should be rotten and the opposite, for example one of the latest reviews is in spanish and is a rotten review and yet if you read the actual review the verdict is basically that while is a little dissapointing its still a good movie , yet its rotten ? lol.I see that a lot on rt in general and is confusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



7 minutes ago, The GOAT said:

WW1984 was at like 87% at the same point........   

 

so was shang chi, around that range ? your point ? still cant understand what happen to ww84 though that drop was unprecident and unusual, the funny thing is that the movie had the same avg rating like thor 2 and yet the rt score had a 10% or so difference in the end, same with aquaman.

Edited by john2000
Link to comment
Share on other sites







10 minutes ago, ViewerAnon said:

I do think there's a "blood in the water" element here, in that a lot of reviewers across the country, outside of LA and New York, will see the film knowing that it isn't controversial to give it a negative grade. It's a potential side effect of the early review embargo and staggered press screenings. If reaction is positive, those smaller market reviews are less likely to make a ruckus. If reaction is mixed, well...


I’m not talking about the critics. They’ll do whatever they do. I’m talking here — there’s a really ugly side of BOT, a mob mentality, that comes out when some film gets really shitty reception (one way or another).

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.