Jump to content

charlie Jatinder

The Admission Count Thread.

Recommended Posts



total-film-revenues-20111.png

 

in 1997-1998, global box office revenue total was only about USD14.6b.

Titanic did 1.8b+ in that year, that was 12.6% of the total revenue of the year.

 

By comparison,

LOTR3, 1.1b/20.2b = 5.5% 

Avatar, 2.8b/31.8b - 8.7%

SW7, 2.07b/38.4b = 5.4%

EG, 2.8b/41b(estimate) = 6.8%

 

No films can come close to double digit percentage, let alone cross it with decent margin like Titanic, 

 

In Brazil and China, Titanic singlely contributed almost 25% of the box office generated in 1998. Even wolf warrior 2 can't have that impact like Titanic in china.    

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, titanic2187 said:

total-film-revenues-20111.png

 

in 1997-1998, global box office revenue total was only about USD14.6b.

Titanic did 1.8b+ in that year, that was 12.6% of the total revenue of the year.

 

By comparison,

LOTR3, 1.1b/20.2b = 5.5% 

Avatar, 2.8b/31.8b - 8.7%

SW7, 2.07b/38.4b = 5.4%

EG, 2.8b/41b(estimate) = 6.8%

 

No films can come close to double digit percentage, let alone cross it with decent margin like Titanic, 

 

In Brazil and China, Titanic singlely contributed almost 25% of the box office generated in 1998. Even wolf warrior 2 can't have that impact like Titanic in china.    

 

more blockbusters now.

Also this is about Admissions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



22 minutes ago, HeadShot said:

more blockbusters now.

Also this is about Admissions.

In NA, looking at the size of the top grosser relative to their corresponding yearly revenue. I don't see how more blockbusters have hurt the size of the blockbusters post 2010s. the size of the top blockbuster remain stable over the course of past 30 years. 

In fact, even among 90s, Titanic is clearly an outlier. 

 

2019 : Endgame - 858m / 11b = 7.7%

2018 : BP - 700m / 11.9b =5.9%

2017: TLJ - 620m /11b = 5.6%

2016: R1 - 532m/11.37b = 4.7%

2015: SW9 - 936m/11.1b = 8.4%

2013: HG:CF - 424m/10.9b = 3.9%

2012: A1 - 623m/10.8b = 5.8%

2011: HP7.2 - 381m/10.2b = 3.7%

2010: TS3 - 415m/10.57b = 3.9%

2009: Avatar - 760m/10.6b = 7.2%

2008 TDK - 533m/9.63b = 5.5%

2007: SM3 - 336m/9.66b = 3.5%

2006: POTC2 - 423m/9.2b =4.6%

2005 : SW3: ROTS - 380m/8.84b = 4.3%

2004: Shrek2 - 441m/ 9.38b = 4.7%

2003: LOTR3 - 377m/ 9.24b =4.1%

2002: SM1 - 402m/9.16b = 4,4%

2001: HP1 - 317m/8.4b - 3.8%

2000: Grinch - 260m/7.66b = 3.4%

1999: TPM - 431m/7.45b = 5.9%

1998 : SPR - 216m/ 6.95b = 3.1%

1997: Titanic - 600m/ 6.4b = 9.4%

1996: ID - 306m/ 5.91b = 5.2%

1995 : TS1 - 191m/ 5.5b = 3.5%

1994: FG - 330m/5.4b = 6.1%

1993: JP1 - 357m/5.15b = 6.9%

1992: Aladdin - 217m/4.87b = 4.4%

1991: T2 - 205m/4.8b = 4.3%  

  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, titanic2187 said:

In NA, looking at the size of the top grosser relative to their corresponding yearly revenue. I don't see how more blockbusters have hurt the size of the blockbusters post 2010s. the size of the top blockbuster remain stable over the course of past 30 years. 

In fact, even among 90s, Titanic is clearly an outlier. 

 

2019 : Endgame - 858m / 11b = 7.7%

2018 : BP - 700m / 11.9b =5.9%

2017: TLJ - 620m /11b = 5.6%

2016: R1 - 532m/11.37b = 4.7%

2015: SW9 - 936m/11.1b = 8.4%

2013: HG:CF - 424m/10.9b = 3.9%

2012: A1 - 623m/10.8b = 5.8%

2011: HP7.2 - 381m/10.2b = 3.7%

2010: TS3 - 415m/10.57b = 3.9%

2009: Avatar - 760m/10.6b = 7.2%

2008 TDK - 533m/9.63b = 5.5%

2007: SM3 - 336m/9.66b = 3.5%

2006: POTC2 - 423m/9.2b =4.6%

2005 : SW3: ROTS - 380m/8.84b = 4.3%

2004: Shrek2 - 441m/ 9.38b = 4.7%

2003: LOTR3 - 377m/ 9.24b =4.1%

2002: SM1 - 402m/9.16b = 4,4%

2001: HP1 - 317m/8.4b - 3.8%

2000: Grinch - 260m/7.66b = 3.4%

1999: TPM - 431m/7.45b = 5.9%

1998 : SPR - 216m/ 6.95b = 3.1%

1997: Titanic - 600m/ 6.4b = 9.4%

1996: ID - 306m/ 5.91b = 5.2%

1995 : TS1 - 191m/ 5.5b = 3.5%

1994: FG - 330m/5.4b = 6.1%

1993: JP1 - 357m/5.15b = 6.9%

1992: Aladdin - 217m/4.87b = 4.4%

1991: T2 - 205m/4.8b = 4.3%  

  

More blockbusters equals to less impressive percentage of the total. Not hard to grasp.  End Game was released in one of the most competitive years of all time. Put it in 2013 and I'm sure it would have looked different. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



9 hours ago, Charlie Jatinder said:

 

This number is definately false. All Greek sources have Titanic admissions between 1.850.000 to 2 mil. tickets before the 2012 re-release.

 

Here's a boxoffice list from July 98 which has Titanic at 868.000 adm. only in the capital city while it is still in theatres

 

And here's another newspaper article from June 99 that says it reached 2 mil. admissions in the entire country

https://www.tovima.gr/2008/11/24/archive/o-polemos-twn-astronomikwn-eispraksewn/

 

 

What I guess happened is lumiere took the capital admissions for whole country admissions. I guess lumiere is a good source for more current movies but Box office reporting before the 00s was a bit haphazard, I wonder if there's errors in others countries also.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, HeadShot said:

More blockbusters equals to less impressive percentage of the total. Not hard to grasp.  End Game was released in one of the most competitive years of all time. Put it in 2013 and I'm sure it would have looked different. 

 

Your claim must be supported by data evidence. Yet, the data falsify your claim. If your claim is true, all the 90s blockbusters like JP, ID, TPM, or TLK should have easily hit double digit percentage or at least came near, but they got the same percentage like 2010s blockbusters.      

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



This is the other movies,here is my count

      Avengers Infinity War

NA:67m

EU:40m

East Asia:77m

Southeast Asia:25m

South Asia:14m

Middle East:4m

LA:60m

Africa:1m

Australia+New Zeland:4m

Total:288.4m

 

Star War:The Force Awaken

NA:110m

EU:61m

East Asia:30m

southeast Asia:6m

south asia:2m

Middle East:2.5m

LA:20m

Australia+New Zeland:8m

Total:239.5m

 

The Lion King(just I guess)

NA:58m

EU:55m

East Asia:35m

Southeast Asia:10m

South Asia:12m

Middle East:4m

LA:55m

Australia+New Zeland:5m

Total:234m

 

 

 

 

Edited by Steven
Link to comment
Share on other sites



10 hours ago, titanic2187 said:

Your claim must be supported by data evidence. Yet, the data falsify your claim. If your claim is true, all the 90s blockbusters like JP, ID, TPM, or TLK should have easily hit double digit percentage or at least came near, but they got the same percentage like 2010s blockbusters.      

 

Yawns, your claim isn't a fact either. Your posting percentages and acting like it means anything when there are so many other factors. It's as dumb as adjusting for inflation.  As I said End Game would have had a much bigger percentage had it been release in a less competitive year this decade. This thread is about admissions aka. which movie was more popular and seen by more people. As you can see EG is the biggest original run of all time. So let's celebrate that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, HeadShot said:

Yawns, your claim isn't a fact either. Your posting percentages and acting like it means anything when there are so many other factors. It's as dumb as adjusting for inflation.  As I said End Game would have had a much bigger percentage had it been release in a less competitive year this decade. This thread is about admissions aka. which movie was more popular and seen by more people. As you can see EG is the biggest original run of all time. So let's celebrate that.  

They are both popular at their era,I think is really hard to compare them.

 

Titanic run on screen half an year at that time,EG only run in 3 month.

 

But EG have advantage,too.Compare to 1998,more and more people born in this world,the population increase,and China market larger 50 times than 1998.

 

EG 380m admission,Titanic 410m admission,the number can said they are both popular worldwide.

Edited by Steven
Link to comment
Share on other sites



20 minutes ago, Steven said:

They are both popular at their era,I think is really hard to compare them.

 

Titanic run on screen half an year at that time,EG only run in 3 month.

 

But EG have advantage,too.Compare to 1998,more and more people born in this world,the population increase,and China market larger 50 times than 1998.

 

EG 380m admission,Titanic 410m admission,the number can said they are both popular worldwide.

Both have their advantages and disadvantages. This is why comparing grosses is extremely difficult.  Admissions is the best way to determine how big a movie truly was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HeadShot said:

Both have their advantages and disadvantages. This is why comparing grosses is extremely difficult.  Admissions is the best way to determine how big a movie truly was.

Yes,Just my opinion.

The most impressive run of all time

1.Titanic

2.EG

3,.Avatar

4.JP1

5.IW

6.JW

7.TLK

STAR WAR THE FORCE AWAKEN global total gross 2.06B,but SW:TFA only popular in NA,EU,JAPAN,so I don't think SW:TFA can call the box office blockbuster worldwide

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Charlie,I know why I am wrong in Titanic india number,Titanic release in india in 3 times,1998,1999,2012,I only count 1998

First+second run(1998-1999): 19.5m admission/60crore/(olive's number)

And I found a local news at 1998,said Titanic was the first foreign film to make a splash in India.

why "first"?

so I wonder know Jurassic Park,Indenpence day performance in India,can you give me some number?

Edited by Steven
Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 hour ago, Steven said:

Charlie,I know why I am wrong in Titanic india number,Titanic release in india in 3 times,1998,1999,2012,I only count 1998

First+second run(1998-1999): 19.5m admission/60crore/(olive's number)

And I found a local news at 1998,said Titanic was the first foreign film to make a splash in India.

why "first"?

so I wonder know Jurassic Park,Indenpence day performance in India,can you give me some number?

Cause Romance movies were big thing in a india at that time. Highest grossing movie were Hum Apke hain kaun, Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge. Romantic movies were fad. Indepence Day was not big at all in India. Jurassic Park might have been successful but not that much i guess

Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 hour ago, Nero said:

Cause Romance movies were big thing in a india at that time. Highest grossing movie were Hum Apke hain kaun, Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge. Romantic movies were fad. Indepence Day was not big at all in India. Jurassic Park might have been successful but not that much i guess

so there are no Hollywood film succeed in india before Titanic??That's so crazy,what about 007?Did James Bond movie in 1960 popular in india?

Link to comment
Share on other sites





On 8/27/2019 at 10:40 PM, Nero said:

Indepence Day was not big at all in India.

Independence Day was Super Hit in India.

On 8/27/2019 at 10:40 PM, Nero said:

Jurassic Park might have been successful but not that much i guess

Jurassic Park per Universal numbers was bigger than Darr, Baazigar in 1993. In 1994 it was only behind Hum Aapke Hain Kaun.

 

BOI numbers are lower than Universal though.

 

Edited by Jedi Jat
Link to comment
Share on other sites







Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.