Eric and Jerry 30,588 Posted October 1, 2020 1 minute ago, WandaLegion said: I mean, I assume this will be a new take, and Foxx is a fine actor, but why unnecessarily associate with the pile of dreck that is TASM2? Wynaut? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Menor 6,612 Posted October 1, 2020 Just now, YourMother the Edgelord said: I mean TASM2 is better than FFH 🤷🏿♂️ In your opinion, but in terms of critical and audience reception, not even close. 2 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WandaLegion 13,729 Posted October 1, 2020 Also, this is meaningless, but I got a chuckle out of the article using the wrong date (Nov 5). So many release date changes that even HWR can’t keep the mcu schedule straight 😛 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YourMother the Edgelord 21,159 Posted October 1, 2020 Interesting choice of development I’ll say that. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WandaLegion 13,729 Posted October 1, 2020 1 minute ago, Eric #RIPChadwick said: Wynaut? Because... most people don’t exactly have fond memories of TASM2, lol. I mean this seems pretty straightforward — positive connotations good, negative connotations bad. It makes me wonder if they have a specific multiverse winking thing lined up here and went to Foxx specifically or if they just decided to use electro in the story with any actor and liked Foxx when he re-auditioned or something. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YourMother the Edgelord 21,159 Posted October 1, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Menor said: In your opinion, but in terms of critical and audience reception, not even close. And it’s my opinion. Joker was an Academy Award nominated film and I hated it. Just because others like it, doesn’t mean others do. Edited October 1, 2020 by YourMother the Edgelord 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WandaLegion 13,729 Posted October 1, 2020 To be clear I won’t be surprised if he turns in a good performance and I like the character a lot in this movie, it’s just an out of left field move that creates more questions than it answers for me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WandaLegion 13,729 Posted October 1, 2020 Maybe Foxx wanted a new take at the character and brought it up himself ala Mahershala for Blade. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eric and Jerry 30,588 Posted October 1, 2020 2 minutes ago, WandaLegion said: Because... most people don’t exactly have fond memories of TASM2, lol. I mean this seems pretty straightforward — positive connotations good, negative connotations bad. It makes me wonder if they have a specific multiverse winking thing lined up here and went to Foxx specifically or if they just decided to use electro in the story with any actor and liked Foxx when he re-auditioned or something. I doubt it’ll be the ASM interpretation lol. And I sincerely doubt people are thinking “golly gee whiz, I sure do like Marvel and I’m excited for this movie, but Jamie Foxx being in this means I won’t watch it because he was in a bad Spider-Man movie”. Honestly, put all the bombed reboots into these superhero movies. Replace Battinson with George Clooney and shit 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Menor 6,612 Posted October 1, 2020 My take is that Foxx is a good actor, and nobody will be turned off by having him in the movie. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lorddemaxus 6,915 Posted October 1, 2020 (edited) Kevin Feige thought Jamie Foxx had a lot of potential as Electro btw (he said that in the leaked emails). He just didn't like the direction they took. Edit: Quote Really love Electro – feels like you may not need the scene in his apartment, which makes him seems completely crazy and hard to relate too. Edited October 1, 2020 by lorddemaxus 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Valonqar 9,888 Posted October 1, 2020 So crossover between 3 Spiderman franchises is happening. I thought that Feige praising Iman Vellani's Spiderman 3 4.5 review was another hint. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Marston 18,213 Posted October 1, 2020 Matter of time before Maguire and Garfield show up also this should mean they should bring back Willem Defoe as Norman Osborn 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CoolioD1 85,569 Posted October 1, 2020 Just now, Valonqar said: I thought that Feige praising Iman Vellani's Spiderman 3 4.5 review was another hint. oh my god. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TMP 7,381 Posted October 1, 2020 1 minute ago, John Marston said: Matter of time before Maguire and Garfield show up Just have Maguire be the new MCU Spider-Man Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lorddemaxus 6,915 Posted October 1, 2020 2 minutes ago, Valonqar said: I thought that Feige praising Iman Vellani's Spiderman 3 4.5 review was another hint. Dude, that was meant to be a joke lol. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WandaLegion 13,729 Posted October 1, 2020 Also, acting choices aside, this will be the first reused major villain from the 5 non-MCU live-action spider-men, right? Guess it was going to happen eventually but also gets them closer to Sinister Six if the studios keep cooperating. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Valonqar 9,888 Posted October 1, 2020 6 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said: oh my god. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpiderByte 3,171 Posted October 1, 2020 So that's why they haven't revealed the title early like the last two, and why there's been almost no details about the story. It's a live-action Spider-Verse movie. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
