google-site-verification=EzRt-ZmNlc4J5RNLXiuJpAEGjNviG678nNB1w49cgZg Jump to content
Eric and the Last Dragon

Spider-Man: No Way Home | December 17 2021 | JAMIE FOXX IS ELECTRO

Recommended Posts

Just now, YourMother the Edgelord said:

I mean TASM2 is better than FFH 🤷🏿‍♂️

In your opinion, but in terms of critical and audience reception, not even close. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, this is meaningless, but I got a chuckle out of the article using the wrong date (Nov 5). So many release date changes that even HWR can’t keep the mcu schedule straight 😛 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Eric #RIPChadwick said:

Wynaut?

Because... most people don’t exactly have fond memories of TASM2, lol. I mean this seems pretty straightforward — positive connotations good, negative connotations bad. It makes me wonder if they have a specific multiverse winking thing lined up here and went to Foxx specifically or if they just decided to use electro in the story with any actor and liked Foxx when he re-auditioned or something.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Menor said:

In your opinion, but in terms of critical and audience reception, not even close. 

And it’s my opinion. Joker was an Academy Award nominated film and I hated it. Just because others like it, doesn’t mean others do.

Edited by YourMother the Edgelord
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be clear I won’t be surprised if he turns in a good performance and I like the character a lot in this movie, it’s just an out of left field move that creates more questions than it answers for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe Foxx wanted a new take at the character and brought it up himself ala Mahershala for Blade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WandaLegion said:

Because... most people don’t exactly have fond memories of TASM2, lol. I mean this seems pretty straightforward — positive connotations good, negative connotations bad. It makes me wonder if they have a specific multiverse winking thing lined up here and went to Foxx specifically or if they just decided to use electro in the story with any actor and liked Foxx when he re-auditioned or something.

I doubt it’ll be the ASM interpretation lol. And I sincerely doubt people are thinking “golly gee whiz, I sure do like Marvel and I’m excited for this movie, but Jamie Foxx being in this means I won’t watch it because he was in a bad Spider-Man movie”.

 

Honestly, put all the bombed reboots into these superhero movies. Replace Battinson with George Clooney and shit

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My take is that Foxx is a good actor, and nobody will be turned off by having him in the movie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kevin Feige thought Jamie Foxx had a lot of potential as Electro btw (he said that in the leaked emails). He just didn't like the direction they took.

 

Edit:

Quote

Really love Electro – feels like you may not need the scene in his apartment, which makes him seems completely crazy and hard to relate too.

 

Edited by lorddemaxus
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So crossover between 3 Spiderman franchises is happening. I thought that Feige praising Iman Vellani's Spiderman 3 4.5 review was another hint. 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Matter of time before Maguire and Garfield show up 

 

 

also this should mean they should bring back Willem Defoe as Norman Osborn 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Valonqar said:

I thought that Feige praising Iman Vellani's Spiderman 3 4.5 review was another hint. 

 

oh my god.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, John Marston said:

Matter of time before Maguire and Garfield show up 

Just have Maguire be the new MCU Spider-Man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Valonqar said:

I thought that Feige praising Iman Vellani's Spiderman 3 4.5 review was another hint. 

 

Dude, that was meant to be a joke lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, acting choices aside, this will be the first reused major villain from the 5 non-MCU live-action spider-men, right? Guess it was going to happen eventually but also gets them closer to Sinister Six if the studios keep cooperating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So that's why they haven't revealed the title early like the last two, and why there's been almost no details about the story. It's a live-action Spider-Verse movie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.