Jump to content

The Wild Eric

A2 WEEKEND THREAD | 134.1M DOM OW | Thurs 17m / Fri 36m / Sat 45m / Sun 36m

How old were you when Avatar (2009) first came out?  

176 members have voted

  1. 1. How old were you when Avatar (2009) first came out?



Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, redfirebird2008 said:

 

I have a lot of respect for Cameron's ability as a director. But I find it sad as a moviegoer that he has spent 25 years on two Avatar movies and will continue spending so much of his time on this franchise for years to come. I feel like we're missing out on some other cool stuff that Cameron might be able to come up with. 

If he had to create new characters from scratch, he’d just fall back on hero’s journey or other cliche tropes again though. Better he can build on existing lore/characters I’d say, because he hasn’t been particularly creative in that department for decades. The technical side is his jam, and hard to imagine a better canvas than the Avatar universe for that aspect. Idk if I feel like we’re “missing” much from him by this being his focus for so long… franchise feels like the right fit for his skills. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



56 minutes ago, JustLurking said:

All the cbms on that list (which is, all cbms from this year other than morbius pretty much) were underestimated rather than over, so I don't see where they overestimated pre-sale heavy films at all, this year anyways. Except Thor, I guess, and even that was barely.

But Black Adam and Black Panther were both more late sale/walk-up heavy than traditional CBMs like Batman and Thor which were basically right (the miss on MoM does stand out a bit), plus throw JWD in that walk-up group

Link to comment
Share on other sites



12 minutes ago, MovieMan89 said:

I still don’t know why on earth anyone would rule out a Cameron film performing like a Cameron film (i.e. crazy multis everywhere)? Those early Twitter critic reactions/tracking tricked me into thinking this could behave more like a typical big sequel opening and then have the Cameron multi too, but the reality may be more of a typical Cameron opening/typical Cameron multi. In which case it would still be massive. 

 

Because only two of his movies have had 'crazy multis everywhere'?

 

1984) Terminator - 9.54x vs

          Beverly Hills Cop 15.43x

          Ghostbusters 16.88x

1986) Aliens - 8.41x

          Top Gun and Crocodile Dundee both with about 21.5x

1989) Abyss - 5.82

          Look Who's Talking 11.57x

          Honey, I Shrunk the Kids 9.16

1991) T2 3day - 6.44x/T2 5day - 3.91x

          Prince of Thieves 6.45x

          Silence of the Lambs 9.49

1994) True Lies - 5.65x

          Forrest Gump 13.48x

          Speed 8.39x

 

It's going to have good to great legs (3-3.99x 😜), but he can't keep that pace of insane legs up forever, especially the further and further he gets into sequels. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Grebacio said:

@XXR Tulkun Rider regarding the OW Contest, i only count 74 conestants intead of 78.
I oredered the numbers from lowest to highest and this is how it looks 

  Hide contents
krla 100,000,000
schachi86 115,000,000
TwoMisfits 115,543,210
greyghost 120,000,000
ChipDerby 122,222,222
cdsacken 122,500,000
Cap 126,707,458
m37 132,370,037
TalismanRing 134,431,341
KlapEastwood 134,781,240
Menor Reborn 136,000,000
Nero 137,000,000
SkimBeeble 137,225,481
Legion 137,373,737
DC Rich 138,536,375
LionRoar 138,888,888
JustLurking 140,178,325
CaptNathanBrittles 142,597,272
narniadis 142,839,140
cookie 143,095,688
Sandro Mazzola 143,152,620
XXR 144,022,815
BlueKyberCrystal 144,875,360
ronin46 145,000,000
Ledmonkey96 145,000,000
vafrow 147,500,000
Shanks 147,787,040
Liiviig 1998 148,510,387
RealLyre 149,000,000
Grebacio 149,278,555
jj99 149,572,123
Jack 151,200,000
Gokai Red 151,502,018
Krissykins 153,000,000
MikeQ 153,123,450
DeepWang 155,081,680
DAJK 156,518,711
B J 157,000,000
IdahoJacket 157,156,892
ZeeSoh 157,500,000
Jim Shorts 158,130,205
Gkalaitza 158,234,567
ThomasNicole 158,237,496
FilmFincher 159,298,632
Flip 159,908,456
JimiQ 162,500,000
Elessar 164,000,000
NCSoft 165,550,000
titanic2187 166,164,123
bcf26 167,850,000
Mr Roark 168,000,000
ky02121 169,000,000
DTP 169,225,007
Fanboy 170,107,343
Borbudur 170,131,099
MattW 170,225,225
IronJimbo 174,333,942
Maggie 176,000,000
mikeymichael 176,205,123
interiorgatordeco 177,325,219
nickitaly 179,812,347
wildphantom 181,342,163
stuart360 181,543,126
Robertron 184,600,000
junkshop 185,000,000
adaros 186,969,696
Marek the Jedi 189,000,000
Georgy P 195,302,959
LPLC 196,000,000
nguyenkhoi 200,000,000
Issac Newton 203,000,000
Lothar 210,000,000
Juby 215,700,000
thajdikt 221,305,492
Asylus 225,000,000

 


I will check when I get home tonight and see where our differences lie.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



2 minutes ago, Deep Wang said:

 

Because only two of his movies have had 'crazy multis everywhere'?

 

1984) Terminator - 9.54x vs

          Beverly Hills Cop 15.43x

          Ghostbusters 16.88x

1986) Aliens - 8.41x

          Top Gun and Crocodile Dundee both with about 21.5x

1989) Abyss - 5.82

          Look Who's Talking 11.57x

          Honey, I Shrunk the Kids 9.16

1991) T2 3day - 6.44x/T2 5day - 3.91x

          Prince of Thieves 6.45x

          Silence of the Lambs 9.49

1994) True Lies - 5.65x

          Forrest Gump 13.48x

          Speed 8.39x

 

It's going to have good to great legs (3-3.99x 😜), but he can't keep that pace of insane legs up forever, especially the further and further he gets into sequels. 

 

Well yeah he can’t keep the pace up of 10x like Avatar just like Avatar couldn’t keep the pace up of whatever absurd multi Titanic ended with bc those weren’t realistic in their day and age. Still think it can totally do something akin to TGM, which is prob not that far off to being equivalent to what Avatar’s multi was in this era of box office. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, M37 said:

But Black Adam and Black Panther were both more late sale/walk-up heavy than traditional CBMs like Batman and Thor which were basically right (the miss on MoM does stand out a bit), plus throw JWD in that walk-up group

Hmm, BP2 wasn't actually super walkup-heavy on Fri. More so than DS2, sure, but not to an incredible extent. From what I remember, presales early in the day were slightly below DS2, actual ended up slightly above. 

Edited by Menor Reborn
Link to comment
Share on other sites



5 minutes ago, MovieMan89 said:

If he had to create new characters from scratch, he’d just fall back on hero’s journey or other cliche tropes again though. Better he can build on existing lore/characters I’d say, because he hasn’t been particularly creative in that department for decades. The technical side is his jam, and hard to imagine a better canvas than the Avatar universe for that aspect. Idk if I feel like we’re “missing” much from him by this being his focus for so long… franchise feels like the right fit for his skills. 

I’m sincerely not sure if we actually want more of Cameron’s take on colonialism, how ‘women these days aren’t featured as heroines as pregnant mothers’ (seriously that Variety interview with Rodriguez was eye rolling) and stuff like that.
 

I think it felt outdated and one of the biggest criticisms thrown at the first Avatar back in the day that stings even harder now. I might not love that I don’t get more blockbusters from Spielberg, but I’m extremely glad and hyped that Lucasfilm and Spielberg allowed Mangold to play on the Indy’s sandbox. Also it doesn’t hurt that Spielberg and other of Cameron’s contemporaries are trying new stuff. I love Nolan’s Batman, but I don’t need him to direct 9 Batman films, or an Inception trilogy for that matter.
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deep Wang said:

 

Because only two of his movies have had 'crazy multis everywhere'?

 

1984) Terminator - 9.54x vs

          Beverly Hills Cop 15.43x

          Ghostbusters 16.88x

1986) Aliens - 8.41x

          Top Gun and Crocodile Dundee both with about 21.5x

1989) Abyss - 5.82

          Look Who's Talking 11.57x

          Honey, I Shrunk the Kids 9.16

1991) T2 3day - 6.44x/T2 5day - 3.91x

          Prince of Thieves 6.45x

          Silence of the Lambs 9.49

1994) True Lies - 5.65x

          Forrest Gump 13.48x

          Speed 8.39x

 

It's going to have good to great legs (3-3.99x 😜), but he can't keep that pace of insane legs up forever, especially the further and further he gets into sequels. 

 

3.7x 👀

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites







1 hour ago, Nero said:

@ZeeSoh when are you going to watch avatar 2?

I wanna see it in IMAX and the only closest IMAX to me (PVR) has tickets starting at 1000+ and going all the way to 1900 for shows after 12pm (AM shows price start at 700-800 which is crazy) and no way in hell am I paying that much for this or any movie for that matter (maybe except Avengers). Max I paid was like 700-800 or so for NWH opening weekend. 

 

This PVR has not scheduled shows beyond Sunday for now so I'll see what the price is like and then decide. Unlike with SH movies I can wait for this for a few days/weeks.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 minute ago, Menor Reborn said:

Well what Cameron is doing these days is more interesting than what Spielberg is doing. 

I somewhat agree. But in the same sense that I would watch Lucas The Phantom Menace at the movie theaters but wouldn’t watch Spielberg’s The Fabelmans. I just think that the prospect of Cameron making god knows how much more Avatar films in the next decade incredibly boring and feels outdated.
 

I just can’t take the white savior trope seriously, and I think that spectacle with razor thin substance isn’t good enough. It doesn’t come as genuine as Coogler’s and Prince-Bythwood’s takes on colonialism, that seems to come to a much more visceral and personal take. I feel like I’d rather see a sequel to Inception or Tenet than yet another Cameron’s Avatar, unless he allows people to come up and play with his toys.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



20 minutes ago, Deep Wang said:

 

Because only two of his movies have had 'crazy multis everywhere'?

 

1984) Terminator - 9.54x vs

          Beverly Hills Cop 15.43x

          Ghostbusters 16.88x

1986) Aliens - 8.41x

          Top Gun and Crocodile Dundee both with about 21.5x

1989) Abyss - 5.82

          Look Who's Talking 11.57x

          Honey, I Shrunk the Kids 9.16

1991) T2 3day - 6.44x/T2 5day - 3.91x

          Prince of Thieves 6.45x

          Silence of the Lambs 9.49

1994) True Lies - 5.65x

          Forrest Gump 13.48x

          Speed 8.39x

 

It's going to have good to great legs (3-3.99x 😜), but he can't keep that pace of insane legs up forever, especially the further and further he gets into sequels. 

 

 

Even Titanic with its 21x, while impressive, wasn't that unusual. It came out at a time where 10+ multis were still very common and just the year prior Scream had a 16x. Mind you, it still had quite a big multiplier and a lot of staying power with 15 weeks at number one, but movies in the 90s still had legs! It wouldn't become unusual for movies to have 4x+ multis until the late 00s - early 10s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites













  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.