Jump to content

Issac Newton

Weekend Thread - 3/17-19 | Weekend Est. - Shazam II $30.5M, Scream VI $17.5M, Creed III $15.4M, LXV $5.8M, #AintMan $4.1M

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, TheFlatLannister said:

This argument still doesn't mean much if the CBMs continue to be stinkers. We have to wait for a well received CBM to do poorly, then we can say superhero fatigue is real 

 

Superhero fatigue and low quality products are linked. People are less inclined to eat the same old average stuff just because is cbm stuff and plus obviously China is a problem way beyond that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



23 minutes ago, Mr Roark said:

 

Superhero fatigue and low quality products are linked. People are less inclined to eat the same old average stuff just because is cbm stuff and plus obviously China is a problem way beyond that.

Yeah honestly a lot of the stuff that now gets 70% on Rotten Tomatoes would've gotten 90% from critics 10 years ago. The quality has not really gotten worse, people stopped going easy on them for some reason.

 

Captain America: Civil War got 90% on RT in 2016. I doubt it even reaches 80% if it releases today.

Edited by Last Man Standing
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Quote

Audience exits on the first Shazam! were harder than CinemaScore results at 79% positive, 59% definite recommend– the sequel saw similar results at 78% positive, and a 64% recommend. Rivals believe that the scores on the first Shazam! weren’t good enough to demand a sequel. Why did New Line make one? Because Shazam! netted a profit of $75M after all ancillaries off a $100M production cost and $105M global marketing spend.

Definitely guilty of letting poor posttrak scores for Shazam 1 get lost in the shuffle despite good CS

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



12 hours ago, Eric Batson said:

...what?

AM3 is scraping to get 2x and it’s part of the mighty MCU. You really think this movie no one cares about and the studio is dumping on streaming less than a month after release is going to beat that multi? No way it hit 2x. It’s just a matter of how low in the 1s does it go? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MovieMan89 said:

AM3 is scraping to get 2x and it’s part of the mighty MCU. You really think this movie no one cares about and the studio is dumping on streaming less than a month after release is going to beat that multi? No way it hit 2x. It’s just a matter of how low in the 1s does it go? 

 

No way it gets to 60M? It will almost certainly get there. Its not going to be 1.7x and 51M as you think. 65-70 is the likely range. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



On 3/19/2023 at 5:55 PM, BestPicturePlutoNash said:

how can you say comic book movies are using a very tired formula while arguing for more "creative" (contradictory) movies like Top Gun and "straight action movies"? Top Gun Maverick was a hit because it was a sequel to a hit and very old-fashioned and formulaic? 

 

Top Gun: Maverick is somewhat formulaic to 80's action movies but with a very modern twist and more effort was put into the production than most comic book movies.  The stunts alone are better than anything I've seen from these CGI bore fests. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MovieMan89 said:

AM3 is scraping to get 2x and it’s part of the mighty MCU. You really think this movie no one cares about and the studio is dumping on streaming less than a month after release is going to beat that multi? No way it hit 2x. It’s just a matter of how low in the 1s does it go? 

I don’t think you understand the relationship between being part of a mighty franchise vs no one caring and legs. Denominators are important!

Edited by Favorite Fearless Legion
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



1 hour ago, MovieMan89 said:

AM3 is scraping to get 2x and it’s part of the mighty MCU. You really think this movie no one cares about and the studio is dumping on streaming less than a month after release is going to beat that multi? No way it hit 2x. It’s just a matter of how low in the 1s does it go? 

Yes. Obviously. What you are saying is impossible and you know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.